Performance status and outcomes in patients with cancer receiving thromboprophylaxis: a subanalysis of the AVERT trial.
10 affiliations
- 1Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- 2Ottawa Methods Center, Ottawa Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- 3Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, Canada.
- 4London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
- 5Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
- 6Department of Medicine, Nova Scotia Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
- 7Department of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, Gabriele D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.
- 8Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. [email protected].
- 9Inflammation and Chronic Disease Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. [email protected].
- 10Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital General Campus, Box 201a, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. [email protected].
Abstract
Background
The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) is central to cancer care planning and prognostication. Whether ECOG-PS also carries prognostic value in the setting of primary thromboprophylaxis for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unknown.Objectives
To evaluate the impact of ECOG-PS on clinical outcomes in ambulatory patients with cancer initiating chemotherapy.Methods
This was a post-hoc analysis of the AVERT randomized controlled trial that evaluated apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) for thromboprophylaxis in patients at intermediate-to-high VTE risk. Multivariable survival models assessed the association between ECOG-PS (0-1 versus 2-3) and the composite primary outcome of VTE or clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), as well as its individual components and all-cause mortality, over 180 days.Results
Of 428 patients included, 368 (86.0%) and 60 (14.0%) had an ECOG-PS of 0-1 and 2-3, respectively. The primary composite outcome occurred in 12.8% (n = 47) in those with ECOG 0-1 and 18.3% (n = 11) with ECOG-PS 2-3 (6-month cumulative incidence: 13.0% [95% CI: 9.8%-16.7%] versus 19.9% [95% CI: 10.5%-31.4%], respectively). Worse performance status was associated with higher risks for the composite outcome (aHR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.14-2.72; p = 0.011), CRB (aHR: 1.58; 95%CI: 1.53-1.63; p < 0.0001), and all-cause mortality (aHR: 5.77; 95% CI: 4.98-6.67; p < 0.0001). In exploratory treatment-effect analyses, apixaban reduced VTE risk across ECOG-PS strata, including among participants with ECOG-PS 2-3, without clear evidence of excess CRB in this subgroup.Conclusions
ECOG-PS predicts VTE-related outcomes in ambulatory patients with cancer and may inform individualized, value-based shared decision-making regarding anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.
Related
- The frequency and risk factors of deep vein thrombosis among surgical patients receiving thromboprophylaxis at Oshakati Intermediate Hospital: a six-year retrospective cohort study.
- Association of pre-existing cardiovascular disease with cardiovascular and clinical outcomes in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors
- Predictors of physical performance decline in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a prospective observational study
- [Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients receiving antithrombotic therapy in a cardiac intensive care unit in sub-Saharan Africa: a retrospective comparative study at the Cardiology Institute of Abidjan].
- Inpatient outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty in patients receiving chronic dialysis: A nationwide propensity score-matched analysis
BibTeX
@article{potere2026performance,
title = {{Performance status and outcomes in patients with cancer receiving thromboprophylaxis: a subanalysis of the AVERT trial.}},
author = {Nicola Potere and Yan Xu and Ranjeeta Mallick and Tzu-Fei Wang and Danny Hill and Alejandro Lazo-Langner and Vicky Tagalakis and Sudeep Shivakumar and Marcello Di Nisio and Philip S Wells and Marc Carrier},
journal = {Cardio-oncology (London, England)},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s40959-026-00542-7},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897686},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Performance status and outcomes in patients with cancer receiving thromboprophylaxis: a subanalysis of the AVERT trial.
AU - Nicola Potere
AU - Yan Xu
AU - Ranjeeta Mallick
AU - Tzu-Fei Wang
AU - Danny Hill
AU - Alejandro Lazo-Langner
AU - Vicky Tagalakis
AU - Sudeep Shivakumar
AU - Marcello Di Nisio
AU - Philip S Wells
AU - Marc Carrier
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Cardio-oncology (London, England)
DO - 10.1186/s40959-026-00542-7
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897686
AB - Background The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) is central to cancer care planning and prognostication. Whether ECOG-PS also carries prognostic value in the setting of primary thromboprophylaxis for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unknown.Objectives To evaluate the impact of ECOG-PS on clinical outcomes in ambulatory patients with cancer initiating chemotherapy.Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of the AVERT randomized controlled trial that evaluated apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) for thromboprophylaxis in patients at intermediate-to-high VTE risk. Multivariable survival models assessed the association between ECOG-PS (0-1 versus 2-3) and the composite primary outcome of VTE or clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), as well as its individual components and all-cause mortality, over 180 days.Results Of 428 patients included, 368 (86.0%) and 60 (14.0%) had an ECOG-PS of 0-1 and 2-3, respectively. The primary composite outcome occurred in 12.8% (n = 47) in those with ECOG 0-1 and 18.3% (n = 11) with ECOG-PS 2-3 (6-month cumulative incidence: 13.0% [95% CI: 9.8%-16.7%] versus 19.9% [95% CI: 10.5%-31.4%], respectively). Worse performance status was associated with higher risks for the composite outcome (aHR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.14-2.72; p = 0.011), CRB (aHR: 1.58; 95%CI: 1.53-1.63; p < 0.0001), and all-cause mortality (aHR: 5.77; 95% CI: 4.98-6.67; p < 0.0001). In exploratory treatment-effect analyses, apixaban reduced VTE risk across ECOG-PS strata, including among participants with ECOG-PS 2-3, without clear evidence of excess CRB in this subgroup.Conclusions ECOG-PS predicts VTE-related outcomes in ambulatory patients with cancer and may inform individualized, value-based shared decision-making regarding anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.
SN - 2057-3804
ER -