Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Severity of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Scale (SoMES) and the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS)

  1. 1University of Manchester.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective: To develop and psychometrically evaluate two new brief assessments measuring disease severity (the Severity of ME Scale, SoMES) and occupational status (the ME Occupational Status Scale, MEOSS) in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) Methods: Draft SoMES and MEOSS were co-produced from relevant literature and lived experience. An online survey completed by adults with ME/CFS and was repeated two weeks later to assess reliability. The SF-36 (physical function) assessed criterion-related validity (Spearmann correlations) and discriminant validity (Kruskal-Wallis tests). Weighted kappa co-efficients assessed test-retest reliability and measurement error calculated minimal detectable difference (MDD). Results: 995 adults with ME/CFS participated and 579 completed the retest survey. Construct validity was confirmed from feedback. Criterion related validity was moderate-good (SoMES r = 0.663, MEOSS r=0.472, both p<0.001). Discriminant validity was demonstrated by significant differences in SF36-PF scores in different levels of SoMES and MEOSS (p=0.003 - 0.0001). SoMES test-retest reliability was moderate (k =0.53, P<0.001) with a MDD of 1.6, and excellent for the MEOSS (k = 0.76 p<.001) and the MDD was 1.4 Conclusions: The Severity of ME Scale (SoMES) and the ME Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS) are valid, reliable, sensitive assessments of ME/CFS severity and occupational status respectively.

Related

  1. Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the NASA-TLX questionnaire among various occupational groups of Persian speakers
    Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia, Mehrnaz Noshadha, Zahra Rafat +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire on Comprehensive Protection, Quality, and Humanization in Pediatric Hospital Care
    Germán Rojas Loyola, Begoña Polonio-López, Juan José Criado-Alvarez +1
    Pediatric reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Subjective word-finding complaints in older adults: Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a novel self-reported questionnaire
    F. El-Khaldi, A. Marier, P. Vitali +3
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  4. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the AASPIRE Social Support Scale for Autistic Adults
    W. Song, T. C. Edwards, M. Baker Ericzen +9
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. Development and psychometric evaluation of a pre-sarcopenia risk assessment scale for sedentary young adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Chen-Xia Zhang, Cong-Cong Jin, Shi-Wei Liu +2
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{tyson2026development,
  title = {{Development and psychometric evaluation of the Severity of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Scale (SoMES) and the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS)}},
  author = {S. F. Tyson and R. Fleming},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.04.26367265},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.26367265v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Development and psychometric evaluation of the Severity of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Scale (SoMES) and the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS)
AU  - S. F. Tyson
AU  - R. Fleming
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.04.26367265
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.26367265v1
AB  - Objective: To develop and psychometrically evaluate two new brief assessments measuring disease severity (the Severity of ME Scale, SoMES) and occupational status (the ME Occupational Status Scale, MEOSS) in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) Methods: Draft SoMES and MEOSS were co-produced from relevant literature and lived experience. An online survey completed by adults with ME/CFS and was repeated two weeks later to assess reliability. The SF-36 (physical function) assessed criterion-related validity (Spearmann correlations) and discriminant validity (Kruskal-Wallis tests). Weighted kappa co-efficients assessed test-retest reliability and measurement error calculated minimal detectable difference (MDD). Results: 995 adults with ME/CFS participated and 579 completed the retest survey. Construct validity was confirmed from feedback. Criterion related validity was moderate-good (SoMES r = 0.663, MEOSS r=0.472, both p<0.001). Discriminant validity was demonstrated by significant differences in SF36-PF scores in different levels of SoMES and MEOSS (p=0.003 - 0.0001). SoMES test-retest reliability was moderate (k =0.53, P<0.001) with a MDD of 1.6, and excellent for the MEOSS (k = 0.76 p<.001) and the MDD was 1.4 Conclusions: The Severity of ME Scale (SoMES) and the ME Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS) are valid, reliable, sensitive assessments of ME/CFS severity and occupational status respectively.
ER  -