Development and psychometric evaluation of the Severity of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Scale (SoMES) and the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS)
- 1University of Manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
Objective: To develop and psychometrically evaluate two new brief assessments measuring disease severity (the Severity of ME Scale, SoMES) and occupational status (the ME Occupational Status Scale, MEOSS) in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) Methods: Draft SoMES and MEOSS were co-produced from relevant literature and lived experience. An online survey completed by adults with ME/CFS and was repeated two weeks later to assess reliability. The SF-36 (physical function) assessed criterion-related validity (Spearmann correlations) and discriminant validity (Kruskal-Wallis tests). Weighted kappa co-efficients assessed test-retest reliability and measurement error calculated minimal detectable difference (MDD). Results: 995 adults with ME/CFS participated and 579 completed the retest survey. Construct validity was confirmed from feedback. Criterion related validity was moderate-good (SoMES r = 0.663, MEOSS r=0.472, both p<0.001). Discriminant validity was demonstrated by significant differences in SF36-PF scores in different levels of SoMES and MEOSS (p=0.003 - 0.0001). SoMES test-retest reliability was moderate (k =0.53, P<0.001) with a MDD of 1.6, and excellent for the MEOSS (k = 0.76 p<.001) and the MDD was 1.4 Conclusions: The Severity of ME Scale (SoMES) and the ME Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS) are valid, reliable, sensitive assessments of ME/CFS severity and occupational status respectively.
Related
- Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the NASA-TLX questionnaire among various occupational groups of Persian speakers
- Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire on Comprehensive Protection, Quality, and Humanization in Pediatric Hospital Care
- Subjective word-finding complaints in older adults: Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a novel self-reported questionnaire
- Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the AASPIRE Social Support Scale for Autistic Adults
- Development and psychometric evaluation of a pre-sarcopenia risk assessment scale for sedentary young adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
BibTeX
@misc{tyson2026development,
title = {{Development and psychometric evaluation of the Severity of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Scale (SoMES) and the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS)}},
author = {S. F. Tyson and R. Fleming},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.64898/2026.11.04.26367265},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.26367265v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Development and psychometric evaluation of the Severity of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Scale (SoMES) and the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS)
AU - S. F. Tyson
AU - R. Fleming
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.11.04.26367265
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.26367265v1
AB - Objective: To develop and psychometrically evaluate two new brief assessments measuring disease severity (the Severity of ME Scale, SoMES) and occupational status (the ME Occupational Status Scale, MEOSS) in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) Methods: Draft SoMES and MEOSS were co-produced from relevant literature and lived experience. An online survey completed by adults with ME/CFS and was repeated two weeks later to assess reliability. The SF-36 (physical function) assessed criterion-related validity (Spearmann correlations) and discriminant validity (Kruskal-Wallis tests). Weighted kappa co-efficients assessed test-retest reliability and measurement error calculated minimal detectable difference (MDD). Results: 995 adults with ME/CFS participated and 579 completed the retest survey. Construct validity was confirmed from feedback. Criterion related validity was moderate-good (SoMES r = 0.663, MEOSS r=0.472, both p<0.001). Discriminant validity was demonstrated by significant differences in SF36-PF scores in different levels of SoMES and MEOSS (p=0.003 - 0.0001). SoMES test-retest reliability was moderate (k =0.53, P<0.001) with a MDD of 1.6, and excellent for the MEOSS (k = 0.76 p<.001) and the MDD was 1.4 Conclusions: The Severity of ME Scale (SoMES) and the ME Occupational Status Scale (MEOSS) are valid, reliable, sensitive assessments of ME/CFS severity and occupational status respectively.
ER -