Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Depth-dependent eDNA abundances across ecosystems inform deep-sea sampling strategies

  1. 1Lehigh University

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys are increasingly used to assess marine biodiversity and inform deep-sea environmental decision-making, including mineral resource management and fisheries oversight. Yet standard low-volume protocols inherited from coastal work may be inadequate at depth, and recent findings indicate that depth- and productivity-aware sampling, often requiring high-volume in situ filtration, is needed, but no quantitative framework links depth and ecosystem context to defensible filtration volume targets. We compiled 841 eDNA samples from eight expeditions across the North Atlantic, Wider Caribbean, and Pacific (surface to 4000 m) to quantify how recoverable eDNA scales with depth and surface productivity, and to derive depth- and productivity-aware sampling targets. Total eDNA concentration declined with depth as a power law, with attenuation exponents (b) modulated by surface productivity: most gradual in eutrophic waters (b = 0.67), intermediate in mesotrophic (b = 0.90), and steepest in oligotrophic systems (b = 1.25); volume-weighted models explained 66 to 88% of the variance. At a fixed extract-concentration target, required filtration volumes diverged ~7-fold between oligotrophic and eutrophic systems at 200 m and ~38-fold at 4000 m. Conventional Niskin sampling therefore undersamples deep-sea biodiversity, particularly in mid- to low-productivity systems. Among laboratory parameters, the assay-specific extract-concentration target exerted greater leverage on required volume than extraction efficiency or elution volume. Volume-aware sampling paired with optimized recovery should be routine in deep-sea eDNA surveys.

Related

  1. Climate Predicts Tree Dispersal Strategies Across Brazil's Ecosystems
    Fernanda C Souza, Vinícius Andrade Maia, Renata Françoso +124
    Global Ecology and BiogeographyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Beyond Removal: Strategies for Sustainable Control of Water Hyacinth in Tropical Freshwater Ecosystems
    Desalegn Chala, Diress Tsegaye, Habtamu Alem +11
    Environmental ManagementPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text8 citedZoology & animal behaviourOpenAlex
  3. Groundwater-dependent ecosystems are missing from global research and policy agendas
    Xander Huggins, Melissa M Rohde, Robert Reinecke +5
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyHydrology & soilsEarthArXiv
  4. Precipitation seasonality and soil carbon shape Arcellinida diversity across Bulgaria's ecosystems
    A. Garcia Bodelon, M. Todorov, N. ElKhouri-Vidarte +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEcologybioRxiv
  5. Hydrodynamics structure the physiological trajectory and bloom dynamics of a harmful diatom species across neighboring coastal ecosystems
    M. Le Gac, L. Prigent, J. Quere +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{herrera2026depthdependent,
  title = {{Depth-dependent eDNA abundances across ecosystems inform deep-sea sampling strategies}},
  author = {S. Herrera and A. F. Govindarajan and E. Andruszkiewicz Allan and R. Francolini and E. Frates and L. McCartin and N. C. Pittoors and M. Sengthep and S. Stover and S. Vohsen and N. Yang},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.05.12.724363},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.12.724363v3},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Depth-dependent eDNA abundances across ecosystems inform deep-sea sampling strategies
AU  - S. Herrera
AU  - A. F. Govindarajan
AU  - E. Andruszkiewicz Allan
AU  - R. Francolini
AU  - E. Frates
AU  - L. McCartin
AU  - N. C. Pittoors
AU  - M. Sengthep
AU  - S. Stover
AU  - S. Vohsen
AU  - N. Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/12
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.05.12.724363
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.12.724363v3
AB  - Environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys are increasingly used to assess marine biodiversity and inform deep-sea environmental decision-making, including mineral resource management and fisheries oversight. Yet standard low-volume protocols inherited from coastal work may be inadequate at depth, and recent findings indicate that depth- and productivity-aware sampling, often requiring high-volume in situ filtration, is needed, but no quantitative framework links depth and ecosystem context to defensible filtration volume targets. We compiled 841 eDNA samples from eight expeditions across the North Atlantic, Wider Caribbean, and Pacific (surface to 4000 m) to quantify how recoverable eDNA scales with depth and surface productivity, and to derive depth- and productivity-aware sampling targets. Total eDNA concentration declined with depth as a power law, with attenuation exponents (b) modulated by surface productivity: most gradual in eutrophic waters (b = 0.67), intermediate in mesotrophic (b = 0.90), and steepest in oligotrophic systems (b = 1.25); volume-weighted models explained 66 to 88% of the variance. At a fixed extract-concentration target, required filtration volumes diverged ~7-fold between oligotrophic and eutrophic systems at 200 m and ~38-fold at 4000 m. Conventional Niskin sampling therefore undersamples deep-sea biodiversity, particularly in mid- to low-productivity systems. Among laboratory parameters, the assay-specific extract-concentration target exerted greater leverage on required volume than extraction efficiency or elution volume. Volume-aware sampling paired with optimized recovery should be routine in deep-sea eDNA surveys.
ER  -