Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Kalman Filtering and Smoothing for Improving Precision in Horvitz--Thompson Estimation of Infectious Disease Prevalence

Abstract

Horvitz--Thompson (HT) estimators can provide unbiased daily estimates of infectious disease prevalence under repeated surveillance by correcting for nonrandom testing induced by scheduled, symptom-based, and contact-tracing components. However, because each HT estimate is based on the testing data available for that day and may involve highly variable inverse probability weights, it can be noisy, have precision that varies over time, and become unavailable during temporary interruptions in testing. The daily HT estimator is modeled as a noisy observation of an underlying prevalence process, with day-specific observation variances estimated using a delete-a-group jackknife. Our primary specification is a joint local linear trend state-space model that extends the standard level-only random walk by adding a latent slope. The Kalman filter improves precision by borrowing information from past estimates. At each time t, the process variances are estimated or carried forward using only observations available through time t, so the resulting filtered estimate is available in real time. We also describe the corresponding Kalman smoother as a retrospective extension based on the full observed series. When daily HT estimates are missing, the Kalman filter proceeds through prediction-only updates, whereas the corresponding smoother retrospectively reconstructs those periods using later observations. In simulations, the joint Kalman filter substantially improves precision relative to the raw daily HT estimator while preserving the main temporal pattern, and the smoother provides a more stable retrospective summary. In The Ohio State University's fall 2020 SARS-CoV-2 surveillance data, the filter and smoother provide estimates on no-testing days, when the HT estimator provides neither point nor interval estimates, and yield narrower confidence intervals than HT intervals on observed days.

Related

  1. Filtering and Smoothing with Score-Driven Models
    Giuseppe Buccheri, Giacomo Bormetti, Fulvio Corsi +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Improving accuracy of finite element solutions by smoothing
    Yuwen Li, Han Shui, Ludmil Zikatanov
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  3. A Counterfactual Framework for Estimating Infectious Disease Prevalence under Repeated Testing with Symptomatic and Contact-Tracing Components
    Jeongjin Lee, Junke Yang, Grzegorz A. Rempala +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Distributed Algorithms for Filtering, Estimation, and Fault Detection over Cyber-Physical-Systems: A Tutorial and Survey
    Mohammadreza Doostmohammadian, Mahdi Shamsi, Hadi Zayyani +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Sequential State-Dependent Kalman Filtering for Dynamic Parameter Estimation of a Mobile User in a Large Cellular Network
    Nahuel Soprano-Loto, Ashutosh Balakrishnan, François Baccelli
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{lee2026kalman,
  title = {{Kalman Filtering and Smoothing for Improving Precision in Horvitz--Thompson Estimation of Infectious Disease Prevalence}},
  author = {Jeongjin Lee and Grzegorz A. Rempala and Patrick M. Schnell},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.09325},
  eprint = {2609.09325},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09325},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Kalman Filtering and Smoothing for Improving Precision in Horvitz--Thompson Estimation of Infectious Disease Prevalence
AU  - Jeongjin Lee
AU  - Grzegorz A. Rempala
AU  - Patrick M. Schnell
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.09325
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09325
AB  - Horvitz--Thompson (HT) estimators can provide unbiased daily estimates of infectious disease prevalence under repeated surveillance by correcting for nonrandom testing induced by scheduled, symptom-based, and contact-tracing components. However, because each HT estimate is based on the testing data available for that day and may involve highly variable inverse probability weights, it can be noisy, have precision that varies over time, and become unavailable during temporary interruptions in testing. The daily HT estimator is modeled as a noisy observation of an underlying prevalence process, with day-specific observation variances estimated using a delete-a-group jackknife. Our primary specification is a joint local linear trend state-space model that extends the standard level-only random walk by adding a latent slope. The Kalman filter improves precision by borrowing information from past estimates. At each time t, the process variances are estimated or carried forward using only observations available through time t, so the resulting filtered estimate is available in real time. We also describe the corresponding Kalman smoother as a retrospective extension based on the full observed series. When daily HT estimates are missing, the Kalman filter proceeds through prediction-only updates, whereas the corresponding smoother retrospectively reconstructs those periods using later observations. In simulations, the joint Kalman filter substantially improves precision relative to the raw daily HT estimator while preserving the main temporal pattern, and the smoother provides a more stable retrospective summary. In The Ohio State University's fall 2020 SARS-CoV-2 surveillance data, the filter and smoother provide estimates on no-testing days, when the HT estimator provides neither point nor interval estimates, and yield narrower confidence intervals than HT intervals on observed days.
ER  -