Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC gastroenterology

Establishment of an enteral nutrition pathway for malignant esophageal obstruction using combined esophageal stenting and gastrostomy.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
  2. 2Endoscopy Center, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350212, China.
  3. 3Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China. [email protected].
  4. 4Endoscopy Center, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350212, China. [email protected].
  5. 5Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, China. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

Malnutrition is common in patients with advanced esophageal cancer and is associated with poor outcomes. While esophageal stenting can relieve dysphagia, oral intake alone is often insufficient. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) provides reliable nutritional support but does not address obstructive symptoms. Data on the combined use of these approaches are limited.Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 16 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent combined esophageal stenting and PEG between January 2016 and December 2024, including 10 who underwent simultaneous procedures and 6 who underwent non-simultaneous procedures. Changes in serum albumin, hemoglobin, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores from baseline to 1 month after treatment were analyzed.Results

The mean age was 63.13 ± 10.36 years, and 75.0% of the patients were male. Tumors were located in the upper, middle, and lower esophagus in 18.8%, 50.0%, and 31.3% of patients, respectively, and 37.5% had an esophageal fistula. The median interval from diagnosis to combined endoscopic treatment was 131.5 days (interquartile range, 20.8-389.8 days). Technical success was achieved in all patients, with no procedure-related bleeding or gastrostomy-site infection. In the non-simultaneous group, the median interval between the two procedures was 6.5 days (range, 2-177 days). New or worsening pulmonary infection within 30 days after treatment occurred in 12.5% of patients. During follow-up, stent migration and restenosis occurred in 12.5% and 6.3% of patients, respectively. At 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, 93.8%, 56.3%, and 18.8% of patients were alive. Among the 15 patients with paired assessments at baseline and 1 month, serum albumin levels were 33.65 ± 4.51 and 34.43 ± 4.89 g/L, hemoglobin levels were 103.93 ± 23.08 and 106.73 ± 22.01 g/L, and Karnofsky Performance Status scores were 70 (60-85) and 70 (65-80) at the two time points. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the changes in serum albumin, hemoglobin, or Karnofsky Performance Status scores (all P > 0.05).Conclusions

Combined esophageal stenting and PEG was technically feasible in patients with advanced esophageal cancer and malignant esophageal obstruction, providing relief of obstruction while establishing enteral nutrition access. This combined strategy may be considered an option for palliative treatment, although its effects on nutritional and functional outcomes require further investigation.

Related

  1. Vitamin D receptor is associated with farnesyl diphosphate synthase protein stability and malignant phenotypes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction Masquerading as Benign Inflammatory Disease in a Young Male: A Cautionary Tale of Diagnostic Delay
    Varsha G Baker, William G Baker, Sindhu Para +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy with Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent versus ERCP with Self-Expandable Metal Stent as Primary Biliary Drainage for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    L. Ying, K. He, L. Jin +3
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  4. Feasibility and Safety of a Novel Pig‐tail Inside Stent for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction: A Single‐center Case Series (With Video)
    Motoyasu Kan, Daiki Takahashi, Sodai Uchida +13
    DEN openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Esophageal cancer-associated thoracic central venous obstruction type 2 which occurred during chemoradiotherapy
    Yoshiki Tokunaga, Kohei Hayashi, Rie Uehara +4
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{huang2026establishment,
  title = {{Establishment of an enteral nutrition pathway for malignant esophageal obstruction using combined esophageal stenting and gastrostomy.}},
  author = {Wennan Huang and Tingting Lian and Hanxi Chen and Biqing Lin and Ou Qian and Dong Lu and Zehao Zhuang},
  journal = {BMC gastroenterology},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12876-026-05287-2},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928134},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Establishment of an enteral nutrition pathway for malignant esophageal obstruction using combined esophageal stenting and gastrostomy.
AU  - Wennan Huang
AU  - Tingting Lian
AU  - Hanxi Chen
AU  - Biqing Lin
AU  - Ou Qian
AU  - Dong Lu
AU  - Zehao Zhuang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/29
JO  - BMC gastroenterology
DO  - 10.1186/s12876-026-05287-2
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928134
AB  - Background  Malnutrition is common in patients with advanced esophageal cancer and is associated with poor outcomes. While esophageal stenting can relieve dysphagia, oral intake alone is often insufficient. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) provides reliable nutritional support but does not address obstructive symptoms. Data on the combined use of these approaches are limited.Methods  We retrospectively analyzed 16 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent combined esophageal stenting and PEG between January 2016 and December 2024, including 10 who underwent simultaneous procedures and 6 who underwent non-simultaneous procedures. Changes in serum albumin, hemoglobin, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores from baseline to 1 month after treatment were analyzed.Results  The mean age was 63.13 ± 10.36 years, and 75.0% of the patients were male. Tumors were located in the upper, middle, and lower esophagus in 18.8%, 50.0%, and 31.3% of patients, respectively, and 37.5% had an esophageal fistula. The median interval from diagnosis to combined endoscopic treatment was 131.5 days (interquartile range, 20.8-389.8 days). Technical success was achieved in all patients, with no procedure-related bleeding or gastrostomy-site infection. In the non-simultaneous group, the median interval between the two procedures was 6.5 days (range, 2-177 days). New or worsening pulmonary infection within 30 days after treatment occurred in 12.5% of patients. During follow-up, stent migration and restenosis occurred in 12.5% and 6.3% of patients, respectively. At 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, 93.8%, 56.3%, and 18.8% of patients were alive. Among the 15 patients with paired assessments at baseline and 1 month, serum albumin levels were 33.65 ± 4.51 and 34.43 ± 4.89 g/L, hemoglobin levels were 103.93 ± 23.08 and 106.73 ± 22.01 g/L, and Karnofsky Performance Status scores were 70 (60-85) and 70 (65-80) at the two time points. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the changes in serum albumin, hemoglobin, or Karnofsky Performance Status scores (all P > 0.05).Conclusions  Combined esophageal stenting and PEG was technically feasible in patients with advanced esophageal cancer and malignant esophageal obstruction, providing relief of obstruction while establishing enteral nutrition access. This combined strategy may be considered an option for palliative treatment, although its effects on nutritional and functional outcomes require further investigation.
SN  - 1471-230X
ER  -