Development and Prospective Internal-Validation Protocol of the SpinePROTECT Score: A Digital Biopsychosocial Risk Stratification Framework for Spine Surgery.
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Postoperative recovery after spine surgery remains heterogeneous, and conventional perioperative risk assessment insufficiently represents psychosocial determinants. We developed the preliminary SpinePROTECT Score within a digital biopsychosocial framework intended to support structured preoperative risk stratification. Materials and Methods: Framework development integrated a structured narrative evidence review, evidence from three complementary institutional research programs, predefined candidate-predictor criteria, expert-informed preliminary weighting, and translation into a modular digital platform. The protocol defines a prospective model-development and internal-validation cohort of 300 adults undergoing elective primary or revision surgery for spinal disorders, with follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. The study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on 8 September 2026 (DRKS00041544) following ethics approval on 28 August 2026 (protocol code 151/26). At prospective registration, recruitment was scheduled to begin on 10 September 2026; the present protocol article reports no prospective outcome data. Results: The development process yielded three complementary domains: psychological vulnerability, clinical burden, and procedural invasiveness. The preliminary framework includes Type-D personality, depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, baseline disability, symptom duration, opioid use, revision status, and surgical trauma. Digital implementation enables electronic questionnaire acquisition, automated calculation of the preliminary SpinePROTECT Score, standardized reports, longitudinal follow-up, and structured research-data capture. Predictive performance is not reported in this protocol article. Conclusions: The SpinePROTECT framework provides a transparent methodological and digital foundation for biopsychosocial risk stratification in spine surgery. The planned prospective study will estimate model coefficients and determine discrimination, calibration, internal validity, and clinical utility before the SpinePROTECT Score is considered for outcome prediction or treatment guidance.
Related
- Development and Internal Validation of a Preoperative Risk Stratification Model for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis
- Prospective validation of multimodal risk stratification using clinical and quantitative imaging features for 12-month outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation
- Development and Validation of an Early Postoperative Risk Stratification Model for Hydrocephalus Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
- Lifestyle, Dietary Habits, and Modifiable Risk Factors in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study with Development and Validation of a Composite Lifestyle and Nutrition Questionnaire
- Factors associated with postoperative ileus after laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer and development and internal validation of a postoperative risk-stratification nomogram
BibTeX
@article{riediger2026development,
title = {{Development and Prospective Internal-Validation Protocol of the SpinePROTECT Score: A Digital Biopsychosocial Risk Stratification Framework for Spine Surgery.}},
author = {Christian Riediger and Mark Ferl and Christoph H Lohmann and Maria Schönrogge},
journal = {Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/medicina62102027},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42942558},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Development and Prospective Internal-Validation Protocol of the SpinePROTECT Score: A Digital Biopsychosocial Risk Stratification Framework for Spine Surgery.
AU - Christian Riediger
AU - Mark Ferl
AU - Christoph H Lohmann
AU - Maria Schönrogge
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
JO - Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
DO - 10.3390/medicina62102027
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42942558
AB - Background and Objectives: Postoperative recovery after spine surgery remains heterogeneous, and conventional perioperative risk assessment insufficiently represents psychosocial determinants. We developed the preliminary SpinePROTECT Score within a digital biopsychosocial framework intended to support structured preoperative risk stratification. Materials and Methods: Framework development integrated a structured narrative evidence review, evidence from three complementary institutional research programs, predefined candidate-predictor criteria, expert-informed preliminary weighting, and translation into a modular digital platform. The protocol defines a prospective model-development and internal-validation cohort of 300 adults undergoing elective primary or revision surgery for spinal disorders, with follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. The study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on 8 September 2026 (DRKS00041544) following ethics approval on 28 August 2026 (protocol code 151/26). At prospective registration, recruitment was scheduled to begin on 10 September 2026; the present protocol article reports no prospective outcome data. Results: The development process yielded three complementary domains: psychological vulnerability, clinical burden, and procedural invasiveness. The preliminary framework includes Type-D personality, depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, baseline disability, symptom duration, opioid use, revision status, and surgical trauma. Digital implementation enables electronic questionnaire acquisition, automated calculation of the preliminary SpinePROTECT Score, standardized reports, longitudinal follow-up, and structured research-data capture. Predictive performance is not reported in this protocol article. Conclusions: The SpinePROTECT framework provides a transparent methodological and digital foundation for biopsychosocial risk stratification in spine surgery. The planned prospective study will estimate model coefficients and determine discrimination, calibration, internal validity, and clinical utility before the SpinePROTECT Score is considered for outcome prediction or treatment guidance.
SN - 1010-660X
SN - 1648-9144
ER -