Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Reading While Writing: Baseline Information Requirements for Molecular Neural Interfaces

Abstract

Molecular neural interfaces that deliver and sense the same neurotransmitter must estimate endogenous release in the presence of their own chemical input. We study two exchanging regions with shared saturable uptake and concentration change measurements. Known delivery and exchange permit identification of apparent uptake at the driven region, but an unknown resting concentration difference leaves the source region's incremental uptake uncertain. We characterize all admissible source histories consistent with both ideal records and show how delivery and baseline information affect release classification. A dopamine-inspired example produces identical ideal concentration-change records for mean release-rate changes of -8.99 and +1.31 nanomolar per second. Stronger delivery changes whether all compatible sources imply suppression, with the true source held fixed. Under a Gaussian observation model, we bound discrimination based on chemical fluctuations. A baseline reference with an assumed standard deviation of 3.3 nanomolar reduces root-mean-square error from 10.41 to 1.21 nanomolar per second compared with an incorrect fixed baseline under exact gain calibration. Classification errors remain substantial with weak excitation, gain errors or responses near the category boundaries.

Related

  1. Neural RNA splicing models rely on reading frame information unavailable to the splicing machinery
    K. Gupta, B. Wang, P. A. Sharp +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  2. Cytokine-Mediated Plasticity in the Molecular Requirements for Peptide-Loading Complex Formation and Antigen Presentation
    Ritchlynn Aranha, Mohadeseh Dastpeyman, Kirti Pandey +4
    CellsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Engineering Neural Interface Materials for Brain–Computer Interfaces: Toward Reliable Neural Information and Functional Recovery
    Kaixin Xu, Qinglei Li, Yangmei Dong +6
    Biomaterials researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCPMC
  4. Revisiting the Molecular Roadmap for Sugar Crops: Genome Reading, Trait Writing and Variety Redesigning
    Peilin Wang, Qibin Wu, W M Wang +5
    Plant Biotechnology JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  5. Baseline cognition accounts for most predictive information on cognitive recovery during rehabilitation after carbon monoxide poisoning
    Mingxing Teng, Fei Yi, Peihui Liu
    Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeuroscienceFrontiersCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{ni2026reading,
  title = {{Reading While Writing: Baseline Information Requirements for Molecular Neural Interfaces}},
  author = {Hongbin Ni and Ozgur B. Akan},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.00763},
  eprint = {2610.00763},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00763},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Reading While Writing: Baseline Information Requirements for Molecular Neural Interfaces
AU  - Hongbin Ni
AU  - Ozgur B. Akan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.00763
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00763
AB  - Molecular neural interfaces that deliver and sense the same neurotransmitter must estimate endogenous release in the presence of their own chemical input. We study two exchanging regions with shared saturable uptake and concentration change measurements. Known delivery and exchange permit identification of apparent uptake at the driven region, but an unknown resting concentration difference leaves the source region's incremental uptake uncertain. We characterize all admissible source histories consistent with both ideal records and show how delivery and baseline information affect release classification. A dopamine-inspired example produces identical ideal concentration-change records for mean release-rate changes of -8.99 and +1.31 nanomolar per second. Stronger delivery changes whether all compatible sources imply suppression, with the true source held fixed. Under a Gaussian observation model, we bound discrimination based on chemical fluctuations. A baseline reference with an assumed standard deviation of 3.3 nanomolar reduces root-mean-square error from 10.41 to 1.21 nanomolar per second compared with an incorrect fixed baseline under exact gain calibration. Classification errors remain substantial with weak excitation, gain errors or responses near the category boundaries.
ER  -