Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBiomaterials research

Engineering Neural Interface Materials for Brain–Computer Interfaces: Toward Reliable Neural Information and Functional Recovery

5 affiliations
  1. 1College of Art and Physical Education, Kyungil University, 50, Gamasil-gil, Hayang-eup, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongbuk-do 38428, Korea .
  2. 2School of Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 475001, PR China .
  3. 3College of Aviation Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Deyang 618307, PR China .
  4. 4College of General Education, Zhejiang Vocational College of Special Education, Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310018, PR China .
  5. 5School of Wushu, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475001, PR China .

Abstract

Motor dysfunction is a major disabling outcome of neurological disorders, including stroke, spinal cord injury, and cerebral palsy. By establishing direct communication between neural activity and external effectors, brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) offer a promising strategy for neural functional reconstruction, enabling motor intention decoding, assistive control, and rehabilitation feedback. However, sustained BCI performance depends not only on advances in decoding algorithms but also on neural interface materials and interfacial properties, as well as the reliable transfer of neural information across signal acquisition, intelligent decoding, control execution, and closed-loop feedback. Existing reviews have mainly focused on invasiveness, electrode technologies, or decoding methods, with comparatively limited integration of neural interface materials, signal reliability, artificial intelligence (AI) adaptability, and closed-loop performance within a unified information reliability framework. Therefore, this review summarizes recent advances in AI-enabled BCIs for motor rehabilitation, compares neural signal and interface characteristics across different levels of invasiveness, examines the effects of key material and interfacial properties on stable signal acquisition, and discusses the roles of AI in data-efficient learning, spatiotemporal and relational neural representation, adaptation to neural distribution shifts, and efficient decoding for real-time closed-loop operation. Representative applications in exoskeletons, neuroprostheses, cerebral palsy rehabilitation, and rehabilitation robotics are further summarized. Finally, current challenges and potential solutions spanning neural interface stability to functional recovery are discussed, providing a systematic pathway toward long-term reliable BCIs and the clinical translation of next-generation intelligent neurorehabilitation systems.

Related

  1. Functional Hydrogels for Wearable and Implantable Neural Interfaces: Materials, Properties, and Applications.
    Joowan Kim, Jaewoo Park, Yeojin Lee +4
    Gels (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  2. The Development and Evolution of Substrate Materials for Brain–Computer Interfaces
    Jiujiang Ji, Yidan Gao, Juan Liu +2
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Reading While Writing: Baseline Information Requirements for Molecular Neural Interfaces
    Hongbin Ni, Ozgur B. Akan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNeurosciencearXiv
  4. Molecular Engineering of Silk via Fatty Acid Esterification for Water-Stable, Anti-fouling, Biocompatible, Implantable Materials
    Sanjana Gopalakrishnan, Emilee Zhang, Mariah L. Arral +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxivPMC
  5. Upcycling Recycled PET into High-Performance Polyurethane Coating and Engineering Materials: Effect of NCO Index on Mechanical, Stability, and Surface Properties
    Panachai Thusanaphoom, Jureeporn Yuennan, Wichain Chailad +5
    ACS Polymers AuPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedSystems & synthetic biologyGeneral chemistryHALEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{xu2026engineering,
  title = {{Engineering Neural Interface Materials for Brain–Computer Interfaces: Toward Reliable Neural Information and Functional Recovery}},
  author = {Kaixin Xu and Qinglei Li and Yangmei Dong and Mian Zhong and Weiquan Shi and Bin Lu and Zhiqi Mo and Jaeyoung Park and Jie Wu},
  journal = {Biomaterials research},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.34133/bmr.0437},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728234},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Engineering Neural Interface Materials for Brain–Computer Interfaces: Toward Reliable Neural Information and Functional Recovery
AU  - Kaixin Xu
AU  - Qinglei Li
AU  - Yangmei Dong
AU  - Mian Zhong
AU  - Weiquan Shi
AU  - Bin Lu
AU  - Zhiqi Mo
AU  - Jaeyoung Park
AU  - Jie Wu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - Biomaterials research
DO  - 10.34133/bmr.0437
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728234
AB  - Motor dysfunction is a major disabling outcome of neurological disorders, including stroke, spinal cord injury, and cerebral palsy. By establishing direct communication between neural activity and external effectors, brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) offer a promising strategy for neural functional reconstruction, enabling motor intention decoding, assistive control, and rehabilitation feedback. However, sustained BCI performance depends not only on advances in decoding algorithms but also on neural interface materials and interfacial properties, as well as the reliable transfer of neural information across signal acquisition, intelligent decoding, control execution, and closed-loop feedback. Existing reviews have mainly focused on invasiveness, electrode technologies, or decoding methods, with comparatively limited integration of neural interface materials, signal reliability, artificial intelligence (AI) adaptability, and closed-loop performance within a unified information reliability framework. Therefore, this review summarizes recent advances in AI-enabled BCIs for motor rehabilitation, compares neural signal and interface characteristics across different levels of invasiveness, examines the effects of key material and interfacial properties on stable signal acquisition, and discusses the roles of AI in data-efficient learning, spatiotemporal and relational neural representation, adaptation to neural distribution shifts, and efficient decoding for real-time closed-loop operation. Representative applications in exoskeletons, neuroprostheses, cerebral palsy rehabilitation, and rehabilitation robotics are further summarized. Finally, current challenges and potential solutions spanning neural interface stability to functional recovery are discussed, providing a systematic pathway toward long-term reliable BCIs and the clinical translation of next-generation intelligent neurorehabilitation systems.
SN  - 1226-4601
SN  - 2055-7124
ER  -