Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiscover Medicine

Case report of postoperative urinary retention resolution following neostigmine administration in a patient with multiple risk factors for POUR

  1. 1University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine
  2. 2Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine
  3. 3TeamHealth Anesthesia

Abstract

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication of surgery and anesthesia, with an incidence of 4–5% in elective procedures. POUR is traditionally managed with bladder catheterization, which carries risks of infection, urethral trauma, and prolonged hospitalization. Pharmacologic alternatives such as alpha-adrenergic antagonists or cholinergic agonists have been trialed, but with variable efficacy. Neostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, enhances parasympathetic activity to promote detrusor contraction and may represent a noninvasive treatment option, although its use in POUR is rarely reported. We report the case of a 73-year-old male with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bladder cancer status-post transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), and interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, who presented for magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided transperineal prostate biopsy. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia and tolerated without complication. Postoperatively, the patient developed acute urinary retention with a bladder volume of 565 mL that persisted for over 5 h despite ambulation, caffeine, and tamsulosin administration. Wishing to avoid catheterization, the patient elected to trial neostigmine after a risk-benefit-alternatives discussion. A 0.5 mg intravenous injection of neostigmine was administered. Complete voiding occurred within 20 min after the injection without adverse hemodynamic effects, and the patient was discharged home promptly. This case illustrates a temporal association between neostigmine administration and resolution of POUR; a single case cannot establish efficacy or causation.

Related

  1. The Therapeutic Effects of 4-Aminopyridine Administration via Phonophoresis on Sutured Postoperative Wounds: A Histopathological, Immunohistochemical, Molecular, and Morphometric Study
    Selma Yaman, Hamit Yilmaz, Gamze Altun +3
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Preoperative Antibiotic Administration Before Distal Radius Fracture ORIF and Postoperative Outcomes: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study
    Jordan Ginder, Zachary Demetriou, Samuel Schrader +3
    Journal of hand surgery global onlinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Exacerbation of Pre-existing Hypothyroidism Following Enarodustat Administration in a Patient on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Case Report
    Kiho Yanagisawa, Yukihiro Wada, Shun Sakurabayashi +12
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Brain Gadolinium Biodistribution, Clearance, and Retention Following High-Dose Contrast-Agent Exposure in Mice: A Multimodal Study
    Alon Zahavi, Stephen Richard, Olga Girshevitz +7
    ToxicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  5. Ocular tissue distribution of Ocular Surface Immune Globulins Following Topical and Subconjunctival Administration: A Novel Strategy for Mitigation of ADC-Associated Ocular Toxicity
    Zeenal Dabre, Emily G. Krupa, Bhuvanachandra Pasupuleti +8
    Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and TherapeuticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{daniel2026case,
  title = {{Case report of postoperative urinary retention resolution following neostigmine administration in a patient with multiple risk factors for POUR}},
  author = {Mitch Daniel and Victoria Martin and John Hodgson and Tanjina Jalil and Enrico Camporesi},
  journal = {Discover Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s44337-026-00729-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44337-026-00729-y},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Case report of postoperative urinary retention resolution following neostigmine administration in a patient with multiple risk factors for POUR
AU  - Mitch Daniel
AU  - Victoria Martin
AU  - John Hodgson
AU  - Tanjina Jalil
AU  - Enrico Camporesi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - Discover Medicine
DO  - 10.1007/s44337-026-00729-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s44337-026-00729-y
AB  - Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication of surgery and anesthesia, with an incidence of 4–5% in elective procedures. POUR is traditionally managed with bladder catheterization, which carries risks of infection, urethral trauma, and prolonged hospitalization. Pharmacologic alternatives such as alpha-adrenergic antagonists or cholinergic agonists have been trialed, but with variable efficacy. Neostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, enhances parasympathetic activity to promote detrusor contraction and may represent a noninvasive treatment option, although its use in POUR is rarely reported. We report the case of a 73-year-old male with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bladder cancer status-post transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), and interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, who presented for magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided transperineal prostate biopsy. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia and tolerated without complication. Postoperatively, the patient developed acute urinary retention with a bladder volume of 565 mL that persisted for over 5 h despite ambulation, caffeine, and tamsulosin administration. Wishing to avoid catheterization, the patient elected to trial neostigmine after a risk-benefit-alternatives discussion. A 0.5 mg intravenous injection of neostigmine was administered. Complete voiding occurred within 20 min after the injection without adverse hemodynamic effects, and the patient was discharged home promptly. This case illustrates a temporal association between neostigmine administration and resolution of POUR; a single case cannot establish efficacy or causation.
SN  - 3004-8885
ER  -