Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCurrent research in structural biology

Structure-guided computational design and mechanistic understanding of the p95HER2-targeting NAZ-mAb antibody and its variants.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  2. 2Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  3. 3Department of Clinical Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  4. 4Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
  5. 5Immunoquest Therapeutics AS, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase in breast cancer and other malignancies. A subset of HER2-positive tumours expresses 611-CTF-p95HER2, a tumour-specific, hyperactive truncated isoform associated with metastasis and treatment resistance that lacks most of the extracellular domain targeted by conventional HER2-directed antibodies. We previously developed NAZ-mAb (formerly known as Oslo-2), a monoclonal antibody against 611-CTF-p95HER2. Here, we describe a computational antibody-engineering workflow for designing variants of NAZ-mAb. Starting from the sequence alone, we modelled the NAZ-mAb-611-CTF-p95HER2 complex, generated a combinatorial mutational landscape using FoldX 5.0, and prioritized candidate variants using predicted interaction energy and developability criteria. Two variants representing distinct design strategies were selected for validation: an aromatic double mutant, NAZ-mAb v1 (L:S31W/L:H107W), and a conservative single mutant, NAZ-mAb v2 (L:S31M). Both variants were successfully expressed as recombinant IgGs; NAZ-mAb v2 achieved a five-fold higher recombinant expression yield than parental NAZ-mAb, while both variants retained antigen binding with a higher apparent signal than the parental antibody in indirect ELISA. However, Biacore two-state kinetic analysis revealed weaker affinities than the parental antibody (KD NAZ-mAb v1: 326.1 nM, NAZ-mAb v2: 94.5 nM vs parental NAZ-mAb: 53.3 nM). These findings show that the computational workflow can generate antigen-engaging NAZ-mAb variants, while also highlighting the limitations of fixed-backbone interaction-energy ranking as a predictor of binding affinity and yield. This study provides a practical framework and a cautionary benchmark for computationally driven, developability-aware antibody engineering in the absence of experimental structural data.

Related

  1. Mechanistic PBPK Modeling of Antibody–Drug Conjugates: Integration of Antibody Disposition, Linker Deconjugation, and Payload Pharmacokinetics
    ToxicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  2. Understanding Venous Remodeling After Minimally Invasive and Noninvasive Treatments for Varicose Veins: A Mechanistic Narrative Review
    Nicolas Falvo, François Ghiringhelli, Olivier Chevallier +3
    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. A Cell-based Screening Method Using an Intracellular Antibody for Discovering Small Molecules Targeting Hard-to-drug Proteins
    Nicolas Bery, Terry H Rabbitts
    Bio-protocolPeer-reviewedLicence not stated5 citedGeneral biochemistryGeneral biologyHAL
  4. Antibody Targeting Soluble NKG2D Ligand MIC Enhances Adoptive T-Cell Therapy in an NK Cell-Dependent Mechanism
    Fahmin Basher, Tyler A. Smith, Mark P. Rubinstein +1
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. A neutralizing monoclonal antibody targeting species B adenoviruses largely mimics the DSG2 receptor engagement mechanism
    Emilie Vassal-Stermann, Camille Berthollet, Wenli Zhang +6
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossref
BibTeX
@article{rawat2026structureguided,
  title = {{Structure-guided computational design and mechanistic understanding of the p95HER2-targeting NAZ-mAb antibody and its variants.}},
  author = {Puneet Rawat and Jon Amund Kyte and Victor Greiff and Esmaeil Dorraji},
  journal = {Current research in structural biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.crstbi.2026.100199},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909185},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Structure-guided computational design and mechanistic understanding of the p95HER2-targeting NAZ-mAb antibody and its variants.
AU  - Puneet Rawat
AU  - Jon Amund Kyte
AU  - Victor Greiff
AU  - Esmaeil Dorraji
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Current research in structural biology
DO  - 10.1016/j.crstbi.2026.100199
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909185
AB  - Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase in breast cancer and other malignancies. A subset of HER2-positive tumours expresses 611-CTF-p95HER2, a tumour-specific, hyperactive truncated isoform associated with metastasis and treatment resistance that lacks most of the extracellular domain targeted by conventional HER2-directed antibodies. We previously developed NAZ-mAb (formerly known as Oslo-2), a monoclonal antibody against 611-CTF-p95HER2. Here, we describe a computational antibody-engineering workflow for designing variants of NAZ-mAb. Starting from the sequence alone, we modelled the NAZ-mAb-611-CTF-p95HER2 complex, generated a combinatorial mutational landscape using FoldX 5.0, and prioritized candidate variants using predicted interaction energy and developability criteria. Two variants representing distinct design strategies were selected for validation: an aromatic double mutant, NAZ-mAb v1 (L:S31W/L:H107W), and a conservative single mutant, NAZ-mAb v2 (L:S31M). Both variants were successfully expressed as recombinant IgGs; NAZ-mAb v2 achieved a five-fold higher recombinant expression yield than parental NAZ-mAb, while both variants retained antigen binding with a higher apparent signal than the parental antibody in indirect ELISA. However, Biacore two-state kinetic analysis revealed weaker affinities than the parental antibody (KD NAZ-mAb v1: 326.1 nM, NAZ-mAb v2: 94.5 nM vs parental NAZ-mAb: 53.3 nM). These findings show that the computational workflow can generate antigen-engaging NAZ-mAb variants, while also highlighting the limitations of fixed-backbone interaction-energy ranking as a predictor of binding affinity and yield. This study provides a practical framework and a cautionary benchmark for computationally driven, developability-aware antibody engineering in the absence of experimental structural data.
SN  - 2665-928X
ER  -