Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NDmedRxiv

Empirical antibacterial use, escalation, microbiological profile, and outcomes in febrile neutropenia: An ambispective observational study

  1. 1Armed Forces Medical College

Abstract

BackgroundFebrile neutropenia requires rapid empirical antibiotic therapy, with regimen selection shaped by local prescribing practice and pathogen patterns. We described starting treatment, later drug changes, microbiological findings, and inpatient outcomes.

MethodsThis ambispective cohort comprised 96 episodes from 90 patients admitted to a tertiary-level teaching hospital. Treatment and outcome analyses used each episode as the unit of observation. Recorded variables included the starting antibiotics, later regimen modification, microbiology, hospitalization length, invasive fungal infection (IFI) as captured in study records, and disposition. Comparisons based on escalation status were exploratory.

ResultCefoperazone-sulbactam appeared in 62/96 initial regimens (64.6%), amikacin in 42 (43.8%), teicoplanin in 28 (29.2%), and meropenem in 14 (14.6%). Eighteen episodes (18.8%) required a change that broadened or substituted antibacterial therapy. Among 31 microbiologically documented infections, 22 (71.0%) yielded Gram-negative organisms and 9 (29.0%) were polymicrobial. Median length of admission was 18.5 days in the escalation group and 9 days in the remainder (p<0.001). Mortality was 27.8% (5/18) with escalation and 5.1% (4/78) without it (p=0.011), with nine inhospital deaths overall (9.4%).

ConclusionAntibacterial management differed within this cohort, with treatment escalation required in 18 of 96 episodes. Gram-negative organisms comprised most microbiologically confirmed infections. Escalation marked a clinically complex course with prolonged hospitalization and greater observed mortality; the observational design does not establish comparative efficacy or causation.

Related

  1. Variability of Nutritional Status During Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Its Association With Clinical Outcomes: An Ambispective Observational Study From India
    Manasi Gupta, Himanshu Aggarwal, Ruma Singh +6
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. BREAKTHROUGH BACTEREMIA DURING PROLONGED FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA IN ADULTS WITH HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES: INCIDENCE, RISK FACTORS, MICROBIOLOGICAL PROFILE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES
    Gustavo Monteiro CUQUETTO, Luiza Falcão NANO, Simone Aranha NÓUER +1
    Hematology, Transfusion and Cell TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  3. Reduced Circulating Regulatory T Cells in Autoimmune and Chronic Idiopathic Neutropenia of Childhood: An Observational Study of Clinical and Laboratory Associations
    Konstantina Toutoudaki, Elena E. Solomou, Marianna Tzanoudaki +10
    European Journal of HaematologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Rapid Response System Escalation During Recovery of Hospital Bed Occupancy: An Observational Longitudinal Study.
    Ayako Noguchi, Tomoaki Yamada, Tatsuhiko Anzai +7
    Nursing in critical carePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  5. A Descriptive Observational Study of Real-Time TDM-Guided Aggressive PK/PD Target Attainment and Microbiological/Clinical Outcome in Patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bloodstream Infections and/or Pneumonia Treated with Continuous Infusion Cefiderocol.
    Milo Gatti, Matteo Rinaldi, Simone Ambretti +3
    Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{trivedi2026empirical,
  title = {{Empirical antibacterial use, escalation, microbiological profile, and outcomes in febrile neutropenia: An ambispective observational study}},
  author = {S. G. Trivedi and S. K. Singh and S. K. Pramanik},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.22.26363666},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.26363666v1},
  note = {CC BY-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Empirical antibacterial use, escalation, microbiological profile, and outcomes in febrile neutropenia: An ambispective observational study
AU  - S. G. Trivedi
AU  - S. K. Singh
AU  - S. K. Pramanik
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.22.26363666
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.26363666v1
AB  - BackgroundFebrile neutropenia requires rapid empirical antibiotic therapy, with regimen selection shaped by local prescribing practice and pathogen patterns. We described starting treatment, later drug changes, microbiological findings, and inpatient outcomes.  MethodsThis ambispective cohort comprised 96 episodes from 90 patients admitted to a tertiary-level teaching hospital. Treatment and outcome analyses used each episode as the unit of observation. Recorded variables included the starting antibiotics, later regimen modification, microbiology, hospitalization length, invasive fungal infection (IFI) as captured in study records, and disposition. Comparisons based on escalation status were exploratory.  ResultCefoperazone-sulbactam appeared in 62/96 initial regimens (64.6%), amikacin in 42 (43.8%), teicoplanin in 28 (29.2%), and meropenem in 14 (14.6%). Eighteen episodes (18.8%) required a change that broadened or substituted antibacterial therapy. Among 31 microbiologically documented infections, 22 (71.0%) yielded Gram-negative organisms and 9 (29.0%) were polymicrobial. Median length of admission was 18.5 days in the escalation group and 9 days in the remainder (p<0.001). Mortality was 27.8% (5/18) with escalation and 5.1% (4/78) without it (p=0.011), with nine inhospital deaths overall (9.4%).  ConclusionAntibacterial management differed within this cohort, with treatment escalation required in 18 of 96 episodes. Gram-negative organisms comprised most microbiologically confirmed infections. Escalation marked a clinically complex course with prolonged hospitalization and greater observed mortality; the observational design does not establish comparative efficacy or causation.
ER  -