Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Conservative Management for Deep Partial-Thickness Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Rahul Dubepuria1
  • Deepak Krishna1
  • Varsha R Choudhary2
  • Suresh K Thanneeru3
  • Amit Agrawal4
4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND
  2. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, IND
  3. 3Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND
  4. 4Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Superficial burns heal spontaneously, whereas deep burns require grafting. Deep partial thickness (DPT) burns can heal spontaneously but may take longer and can form hypertrophic scars and contractures. The choice between split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) and conservative management for DPT burns remains a dilemma. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of both procedures. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were systematically searched for relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, and cohort studies were included. Case reports, case series, editorials, animal studies, and non-English literature were excluded. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model in RevMan 5.4. Seven studies, including 650 patients, were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis showed that the STSG group had significantly reduced wound-healing time (standardized mean difference (SMD): -2.01 (-3.80 to -0.22), p=0.03) and a shorter hospital stay (SMD: -3.75 (-6.98 to -0.52), p=0.02). No significant differences were found in wound infection rates, long-term scarring, or the need for reconstructive procedures at a later date. STSG offers a shorter wound-healing time and a reduced hospital stay compared with conservative management for DPT burns. However, due to high heterogeneity and a limited number of studies, further RCTs will help provide better evidence.

Related

  1. Which Injection Is More Effective for Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear? Atelocollagen Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Kyoung-Geun Lee, Sung-Hyun Cho, Yang-Soo Kim
    Clinics in orthopedic surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Conservative and Minimally Invasive Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders Versus Inactive Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Oana Țănculescu, Eugenia-Larisa Țarevici, Petronela Bodnar +12
    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Comparing Nerve Transfer Versus Tendon Transfer and Conservative Management for Restoring Finger Extension Following Tetraplegia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Naveen Arunachalam Sakthiyendran, Caroline J. Cushman, Evan J. Hernandez +1
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Dexamethasone versus triamcinolone acetonide for the management of postoperative inflammation following cataract surgery : A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Humayou Ahmed, Muhammad Saad Khan, Zauha Fawad Memon +12
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Metallic versus plastic stents for the management of biliary obstruction : A GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aleena Amir Malik, Manal Sharif, Waqas Kareem +19
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{dubepuria2026splitthickness,
  title = {{Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Conservative Management for Deep Partial-Thickness Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis}},
  author = {Rahul Dubepuria and Deepak Krishna and Varsha R Choudhary and Suresh K Thanneeru and Amit Agrawal},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.117230},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13722361},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Conservative Management for Deep Partial-Thickness Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU  - Rahul Dubepuria
AU  - Deepak Krishna
AU  - Varsha R Choudhary
AU  - Suresh K Thanneeru
AU  - Amit Agrawal
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.117230
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13722361
AB  - Superficial burns heal spontaneously, whereas deep burns require grafting. Deep partial thickness (DPT) burns can heal spontaneously but may take longer and can form hypertrophic scars and contractures. The choice between split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) and conservative management for DPT burns remains a dilemma. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of both procedures. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were systematically searched for relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, and cohort studies were included. Case reports, case series, editorials, animal studies, and non-English literature were excluded. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model in RevMan 5.4. Seven studies, including 650 patients, were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis showed that the STSG group had significantly reduced wound-healing time (standardized mean difference (SMD): -2.01 (-3.80 to -0.22), p=0.03) and a shorter hospital stay (SMD: -3.75 (-6.98 to -0.52), p=0.02). No significant differences were found in wound infection rates, long-term scarring, or the need for reconstructive procedures at a later date. STSG offers a shorter wound-healing time and a reduced hospital stay compared with conservative management for DPT burns. However, due to high heterogeneity and a limited number of studies, further RCTs will help provide better evidence.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -