Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCClinics in orthopedic surgery
Which Injection Is More Effective for Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear? Atelocollagen Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, .
Related
- Comparative Effects of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Atelocollagen Injections in Intratendinous Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Longitudinal Voice Outcomes After Atelocollagen Injection Laryngoplasty for Vocal Fold Paralysis and Vocal Fold Atrophy/Sulcus
- Is intra-articular injection of high-concentration ozone (O2–O3) more effective in treating knee osteoarthritis? : A multicenter cohort study
- Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Conservative Management for Deep Partial-Thickness Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Rapid Pain Reduction and Wound Closure Following Treatment With an Amorphous Silica-Based Fiber Wound Matrix in Partial-Thickness Thermal Burns: A Case Report.
BibTeX
@article{lee2026which,
title = {{Which Injection Is More Effective for Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear? Atelocollagen Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix}},
author = {Kyoung-Geun Lee and Sung-Hyun Cho and Yang-Soo Kim},
journal = {Clinics in orthopedic surgery},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13662246},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Which Injection Is More Effective for Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear? Atelocollagen Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix
AU - Kyoung-Geun Lee
AU - Sung-Hyun Cho
AU - Yang-Soo Kim
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/04
JO - Clinics in orthopedic surgery
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13662246
SN - 2005-291X
SN - 2005-4408
ER -