Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDInternational journal for equity in health

Residential Environments and ACcess to Healthcare (REACH 1): exploring the relationship between food deserts and mobility outcomes in lower limb prosthesis users.

  1. 1Hanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, 10910 Domain Dr, Suite 300, Austin, TX, 78758, USA.
  2. 2Hanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, 10910 Domain Dr, Suite 300, Austin, TX, 78758, USA. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

The intersection of geographic and economic disadvantage in food deserts (FDs) creates substantial barriers to food access, particularly for individuals with mobility impairments. For lower limb prosthesis users residing in food deserts, these challenges may be intensified by socioeconomic disparities that affect access to prosthetic care, device type, and rehabilitation services. These factors collectively hinder mobility, further limiting the ability to navigate and overcome environmental constraints. This study aimed to examine the relationship between FD residency and mobility outcomes among lower limb prosthesis users.Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis (N = 45,685) was conducted, grouping participants by FD residency status. Demographic and prosthetic rehabilitation variables were compared using Student's t-tests and Pearson's Chi-square tests. Mobility, measured by the PLUS-M™ T-score, was analyzed as a continuous variable using two-way ANOVA and as a categorical variable using simple and multiple logistic regression.Results

Significant differences were found between FD and non-FD (nFD) residents in prosthesis use, assistive device use, insurance coverage, and mobility outcomes. FD residents had an average PLUS-M™ T-score 1.15 points lower than nFD residents (p < 0.001, d = 0,1, small effect) and were significantly less likely to achieve high mobility (PLUS-M ≥ 50). This disparity remained statistically significant after adjusting for demographic and clinical variables.Conclusions

This study highlights disparities in mobility among lower limb prosthesis users, emphasizing the intersection of FD residency, insurance coverage, and prosthetic rehabilitation access. These findings highlight a potential need for targeted interventions to address mobility limitations in socioeconomically disadvantaged environments.

Related

  1. Exploring Dual-Factor Mental Health Profiles in Portuguese Therapeutic Residential Care: Distinguishing Clinical and Sub-Clinical Subgroups Among Females
    Emma Castro, Eunice Magalhães, Patrício Costa +1
    Journal of Child & Adolescent TraumaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  2. Urban and residential environments and osteoarthritis: evidence for disease onset, symptoms, and care
    Zhao Zhang, Yi Zhao
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  3. Integrating outdoor environments into health service delivery at residential care facilities for older adults.
    Madeleine Liljegren, Anna Bengtsson, Göran Lindahl +1
    BMC health services researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Cool Homes, Connected Neighbourhoods: Residential Environments and Heat‑Related Mental Well‑Being
    K Dinhof, C Lampl
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMCEurope PMC
  5. Exploring the Relationship Between Positive Play and Perceived Knowledge in Traditional Sports Gambling
    Alexander J. Connolly, Rakin Faruk, Jennifer T. Grant Weainandy +3
    International gambling studiesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{delgado2026residential,
  title = {{Residential Environments and ACcess to Healthcare (REACH 1): exploring the relationship between food deserts and mobility outcomes in lower limb prosthesis users.}},
  author = {Patsy M Diaz Delgado and Emily A Steffensen and Dwiesha L England and Shane R Wurdeman and Bretta L Fylstra},
  journal = {International journal for equity in health},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12939-026-02943-7},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958333},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Residential Environments and ACcess to Healthcare (REACH 1): exploring the relationship between food deserts and mobility outcomes in lower limb prosthesis users.
AU  - Patsy M Diaz Delgado
AU  - Emily A Steffensen
AU  - Dwiesha L England
AU  - Shane R Wurdeman
AU  - Bretta L Fylstra
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - International journal for equity in health
DO  - 10.1186/s12939-026-02943-7
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958333
AB  - Background  The intersection of geographic and economic disadvantage in food deserts (FDs) creates substantial barriers to food access, particularly for individuals with mobility impairments. For lower limb prosthesis users residing in food deserts, these challenges may be intensified by socioeconomic disparities that affect access to prosthetic care, device type, and rehabilitation services. These factors collectively hinder mobility, further limiting the ability to navigate and overcome environmental constraints. This study aimed to examine the relationship between FD residency and mobility outcomes among lower limb prosthesis users.Methods  A retrospective cross-sectional analysis (N = 45,685) was conducted, grouping participants by FD residency status. Demographic and prosthetic rehabilitation variables were compared using Student's t-tests and Pearson's Chi-square tests. Mobility, measured by the PLUS-M™ T-score, was analyzed as a continuous variable using two-way ANOVA and as a categorical variable using simple and multiple logistic regression.Results  Significant differences were found between FD and non-FD (nFD) residents in prosthesis use, assistive device use, insurance coverage, and mobility outcomes. FD residents had an average PLUS-M™ T-score 1.15 points lower than nFD residents (p < 0.001, d = 0,1, small effect) and were significantly less likely to achieve high mobility (PLUS-M ≥ 50). This disparity remained statistically significant after adjusting for demographic and clinical variables.Conclusions  This study highlights disparities in mobility among lower limb prosthesis users, emphasizing the intersection of FD residency, insurance coverage, and prosthetic rehabilitation access. These findings highlight a potential need for targeted interventions to address mobility limitations in socioeconomically disadvantaged environments.
SN  - 1475-9276
ER  -