Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,620 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Neuroscience

Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions and biofeedback for migraine management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aims to analyze the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions and biofeedback on headache frequency, pain intensity, headache-related disability, psychological distress, and quality of life in adult patients with migraine.MethodsThe review followed the PRISMA statement and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261381587). A structured search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo for RCTs published in English between May 2016 and May 2026. Seven clinical trials (n = 535 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool.ResultsThe pooled analysis for headache frequency (n = 6 studies) showed no statistically significant differences between groups (MD = −0.59; 95% CI: −1.81 to 0.62; p = 0.34). Conversely, significant improvements favoring the experimental groups were found for headache-related disability measured with the HIT-6 scale (n = 6 studies; MD = −2.28; 95% CI: −4.47 to −0.08; p = 0.04), pain intensity (n = 3 studies; SMD = −0.39; 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.14; p = 0.002), and health-related quality of life (n = 3 studies; MD = +5.21; 95% CI: 1.95 to 8.47; p = 0.002). No statistically significant differences were observed for anxiety (p = 0.30) or depression (p = 0.88).ConclusionInterventions incorporating Mindfulness-Based Interventions and Biofeedback do not significantly reduce objective migraine attack frequency compared to control conditions, nor do they yield distinct differences in affective outcomes (anxiety/depression)—which may partly reflect subclinical baseline depression scores in episodic cohorts, active-comparator effects, and instrument heterogeneity. However, they exhibit statistically significant efficacy in decreasing subjective pain intensity, mitigating headache-related functional disability, and restoring health-related quality of life, supporting their role as valuable complementary strategies for self-regulation and clinical coping in migraine management.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261381587, Identifier: CRD420261381587.

Related

  1. A Personalized Approach to Student Mental Health: Real-Time EEG Biofeedback for Stress and Focus Management
    A. K. Jha, A. Kalsekar, M. S. Chogle
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  2. Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on stress and anxiety management in pregnancy: a systematic review
    Julianne Sautier, Cyril Tarquinio, Thierry Cardoso +1
    MidwiferyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  3. Airway management and anaesthetic interventions for children with cleft lip and/or palate undergoing general anaesthesia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sharmin Akter Sumi, Kazi Mahzabin Arin, Shahriar Mohd Shams +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textDevelopmental biologyStatisticsPLOSPMC
  4. Hydrolyzed Rice Formula for the Management of Cow’s Milk Allergy in Infants and Young Children: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hania Szajewska, Elżbieta Jarocka-Cyrta, Agata Stróżyk +5
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Hippocampal-somatomotor coactivation and perceived benefit following Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Life in healthcare students: An exploratory randomized study
    N. Clairis, L. F. Saccaro, S. Delplanque +9
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{zahrihaidar2026efficacy,
  title = {{Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions and biofeedback for migraine management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials}},
  author = {Chaimae Zahri-Haidar and Jose I. Recio-Rodriguez and Natalia Sanchez-Aguadero and Hsin-Chien Lee and Luis López-Mesonero and Hsueh-Chen Lu and Irene A. Garcia-Yu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Neuroscience},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fnins.2026.1965907},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2026.1965907},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions and biofeedback for migraine management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU  - Chaimae Zahri-Haidar
AU  - Jose I. Recio-Rodriguez
AU  - Natalia Sanchez-Aguadero
AU  - Hsin-Chien Lee
AU  - Luis López-Mesonero
AU  - Hsueh-Chen Lu
AU  - Irene A. Garcia-Yu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/11
JO  - Frontiers in Neuroscience
DO  - 10.3389/fnins.2026.1965907
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2026.1965907
AB  - ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aims to analyze the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions and biofeedback on headache frequency, pain intensity, headache-related disability, psychological distress, and quality of life in adult patients with migraine.MethodsThe review followed the PRISMA statement and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261381587). A structured search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo for RCTs published in English between May 2016 and May 2026. Seven clinical trials (n = 535 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool.ResultsThe pooled analysis for headache frequency (n = 6 studies) showed no statistically significant differences between groups (MD = −0.59; 95% CI: −1.81 to 0.62; p = 0.34). Conversely, significant improvements favoring the experimental groups were found for headache-related disability measured with the HIT-6 scale (n = 6 studies; MD = −2.28; 95% CI: −4.47 to −0.08; p = 0.04), pain intensity (n = 3 studies; SMD = −0.39; 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.14; p = 0.002), and health-related quality of life (n = 3 studies; MD = +5.21; 95% CI: 1.95 to 8.47; p = 0.002). No statistically significant differences were observed for anxiety (p = 0.30) or depression (p = 0.88).ConclusionInterventions incorporating Mindfulness-Based Interventions and Biofeedback do not significantly reduce objective migraine attack frequency compared to control conditions, nor do they yield distinct differences in affective outcomes (anxiety/depression)—which may partly reflect subclinical baseline depression scores in episodic cohorts, active-comparator effects, and instrument heterogeneity. However, they exhibit statistically significant efficacy in decreasing subjective pain intensity, mitigating headache-related functional disability, and restoring health-related quality of life, supporting their role as valuable complementary strategies for self-regulation and clinical coping in migraine management.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261381587, Identifier: CRD420261381587.
SN  - 1662-453X
SN  - 1662-4548
ER  -