Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintCC BY

Classical Approximations vs. Relativistic Realities: A Theoretical Analysis of Kinetic Energy

  1. 1Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Abstract

This paper presents a rigorous theoretical examination of kinetic energy across classical and relativistic domains. While Newtonian mechanics model’s kinetic energy as a straightforward function of mass and velocity squared, special relativity introduces Lorentz transformations that account for mass-energy equivalence and velocity limits near the speed of light. Utilizing a binomial series expansion of the Lorentz factor, this study demonstrates that Newtonian kinetic energy represents a valid first-order approximation at low velocities. However, as velocity approaches the speed of light, the higher-order relativistic terms become dominant, creating a substantial divergence between classical predictions and physical reality. The findings highlight the boundaries of classical mechanics and reinforce the necessity of relativistic models in high-energy physics applications

Related

  1. Derivation and Classical Limit of the Relativistic Lorentz Factor
    Chinnaraji Annamalai
    PreprintCC BYFull text13 citedGeneral astronomyOpenAlex
  2. Pulsation periods reveal tension between theoretical and empirical radii for classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems
    O. Ziółkowska, R. Smolec, R. Singh Rathour +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  3. Classical Cepheids in the JWST and Roman era: A new theoretical framework and its metallicity dependence
    De Somma Giulia, Marconi Marcella, Ripepi Vincenzo +7
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSolar & stellar physicsDOAJ
  4. Fisher and DALI posterior approximations for testing gravity with gravitational waves
    Felipe A. da Silva Barbosa, Davi C. Rodrigues, Josiel Mendonça Soares de Souza +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  5. Bayesian Inferences on Analytical Equations of State Approximations of Neutron Stars
    Arijit Das, Sourav Roy Chowdhury
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsNuclear physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{annamalai2026classical,
  title = {{Classical Approximations vs. Relativistic Realities: A Theoretical Analysis of Kinetic Energy}},
  author = {Chinnaraji Annamalai},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.33774/coe-2026-vzlr0},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2026-vzlr0},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Classical Approximations vs. Relativistic Realities: A Theoretical Analysis of Kinetic Energy
AU  - Chinnaraji Annamalai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/31
DO  - 10.33774/coe-2026-vzlr0
UR  - https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2026-vzlr0
AB  - This paper presents a rigorous theoretical examination of kinetic energy across classical and relativistic domains. While Newtonian mechanics model’s kinetic energy as a straightforward function of mass and velocity squared, special relativity introduces Lorentz transformations that account for mass-energy equivalence and velocity limits near the speed of light. Utilizing a binomial series expansion of the Lorentz factor, this study demonstrates that Newtonian kinetic energy represents a valid first-order approximation at low velocities. However, as velocity approaches the speed of light, the higher-order relativistic terms become dominant, creating a substantial divergence between classical predictions and physical reality. The findings highlight the boundaries of classical mechanics and reinforce the necessity of relativistic models in high-energy physics applications
ER  -