No Added Sugar Mandate for the Nutrition Information Panel in Australia: A Missed Policy Opportunity for Early‐Life Nutrition?
- 1School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- 2Translation Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- 3School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
The first 1000 days of life are widely recognised as an important period for growth, development and the establishment of dietary preferences and eating behaviours that may persist across the life course. In Australia, the food regulator (Food Standards Australia New Zealand, FSANZ) recently abandoned Proposal P1058-Nutrition labelling about added sugars, which considered an amendment to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to include 'added sugars' information in the Nutrition Information Panel (NIP). This decision provides an opportunity to examine implications for products manufactured and marketed for infants and toddlers. At present, the NIP requires declaration of total sugars, but this does not distinguish between intrinsic sugars naturally present in foods and sugars contributed through ingredients such as fruit juice concentrates, fruit purees, syrups, or other sweetening ingredients. This distinction is relevant in the context of the rapidly expanding market for commercial infant and toddler foods, including squeeze pouches, fruit-based snacks, toddler yoghurts and sweetened snack-style products that often utilise extruded fruit juice products as an ingredient to create a sweeter taste profile. In addition, parents often assume that commercial infant and toddler foods are healthy and low in sugar. While the broader evidence base for the general population did not support mandatory reform across all packaged foods, the implications for infant and toddler products remain relevant to ongoing policy discussions. The recent FSANZ decision provides an opportunity to consider whether foods marketed to infants and young children represent a distinct regulatory context in which greater labelling clarity, alongside other policy approaches, may contribute to early-life nutrition objectives.
Related
- Nutrition Knowledge, Information Sources, and Self-Perceived Ability to Provide Nutrition Counseling Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Navigating Nutrition Information in the Digital Era: How Tourism and Recreation Students Evaluate Online Dietary Advice?
- Perspectives of European Nutrition Professionals on Healthy Eating Policies: An International Comparative Study of Implementation Gaps and Information Credibility
- Non-occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia Associated with Enteral Nutrition
- Editorial: Impact of plant bioactive compounds on human nutrition and health
BibTeX
@article{fleming2026added,
title = {{No Added Sugar Mandate for the Nutrition Information Panel in Australia: A Missed Policy Opportunity for Early‐Life Nutrition?}},
author = {Catharine A K Fleming and Bianca Smith and Bridget Kelly and Katherine Kent},
journal = {Maternal \& child nutrition},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1111/mcn.70261},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717603},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - No Added Sugar Mandate for the Nutrition Information Panel in Australia: A Missed Policy Opportunity for Early‐Life Nutrition?
AU - Catharine A K Fleming
AU - Bianca Smith
AU - Bridget Kelly
AU - Katherine Kent
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Maternal & child nutrition
DO - 10.1111/mcn.70261
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717603
AB - The first 1000 days of life are widely recognised as an important period for growth, development and the establishment of dietary preferences and eating behaviours that may persist across the life course. In Australia, the food regulator (Food Standards Australia New Zealand, FSANZ) recently abandoned Proposal P1058-Nutrition labelling about added sugars, which considered an amendment to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to include 'added sugars' information in the Nutrition Information Panel (NIP). This decision provides an opportunity to examine implications for products manufactured and marketed for infants and toddlers. At present, the NIP requires declaration of total sugars, but this does not distinguish between intrinsic sugars naturally present in foods and sugars contributed through ingredients such as fruit juice concentrates, fruit purees, syrups, or other sweetening ingredients. This distinction is relevant in the context of the rapidly expanding market for commercial infant and toddler foods, including squeeze pouches, fruit-based snacks, toddler yoghurts and sweetened snack-style products that often utilise extruded fruit juice products as an ingredient to create a sweeter taste profile. In addition, parents often assume that commercial infant and toddler foods are healthy and low in sugar. While the broader evidence base for the general population did not support mandatory reform across all packaged foods, the implications for infant and toddler products remain relevant to ongoing policy discussions. The recent FSANZ decision provides an opportunity to consider whether foods marketed to infants and young children represent a distinct regulatory context in which greater labelling clarity, alongside other policy approaches, may contribute to early-life nutrition objectives.
SN - 1740-8695
SN - 1740-8709
ER -