Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Single-Ball Versus Double-Ball Flexor Carpi Radialis Interposition Arthroplasty Following Trapeziectomy: A Retrospective Radiological Study

  1. 1Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, THA
  2. 2Department of Orthopaedics, Tharongchang Hospital, Surat Thani, THA

Abstract

Introduction The trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint represents the second most prevalent site of osteoarthritis in the hand. Following trapeziectomy, ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI) is widely considered the gold standard treatment. However, there is currently no objective radiographic evidence comparing single-ball (SB) versus double-ball (DB) flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon interposition in preventing first metacarpal collapse after surgery. Methods A total of 20 patients who underwent trapeziectomy and LRTI with an FCR graft from 2013 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed (divided into 10 SB and 10 DB cases), with a minimum radiographic follow-up of one year. Standard posteroanterior radiographs were analyzed to compare preoperative and one-year postoperative parameters, including trapezial void height (HT1 vs HT2), first metacarpal subluxation (MS1 vs MS2), and first metacarpal migration (MM1 vs MM2) measured at baseline and one year postoperatively. Results Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. At one year, the DB group showed a statistically superior trapezial void height (HT2) compared to the SB group (mean difference, -2.98 (95% CI, -5.22 to -0.74); p < 0.05). Conversely, no significant intergroup differences were found in first metacarpal subluxation (MS2) (mean difference, -0.60 (95% CI, -3.45 to 2.25); p = 0.663) or migration (MM2) (mean difference, 2.80 (95% CI, -1.43 to 7.02); p = 0.181). Conclusions At one year, the DB technique showed higher absolute trapezial void height than the SB technique. The loss of height from baseline did not differ significantly between groups. Subluxation and migration of the first metacarpal were also similar. Given baseline differences and the lack of functional data, these exploratory results do not establish superior joint space preservation or better clinical outcomes.

Related

  1. The impact of preoperative radiological paraspinal lumbar measures on the postoperative satisfaction of patients following lumbar fusion surgery- a retrospective case-control study.
    Lei Wang, Jingming Wang, Xiaoduo Xu +3
    BMC musculoskeletal disordersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Functional and Radiological Results of the Subvastus Versus Medial Parapatellar Method in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Cohort.
    Jayvirsinh Solanki, Mukesh Yadav, Amit Kumar Jha +2
    Journal of orthopaedic case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. A 15-year evaluation of two total knee arthroplasty designs : similar patient-reported outcomes and survivorship but divergent patellofemoral and radiological outcomes
    Nick D. Clement, Thomas R. Williamson, Gillian L. Leitch +2
    Bone & joint openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Diabetic Striatopathy Following Radiological Improvement: An Autopsy-confirmed Case Report and Literature Review
    Yuya Ando, Masato Kadoya, Ayumu Kurihara +4
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text2 citedEndocrinology & metabolismJ-STAGE
  5. Clinical and radiological features of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children: a retrospective study
    Hua Huang, Shujuan Jiang, Huan Xu +2
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{chunyawongsak2026singleball,
  title = {{Single-Ball Versus Double-Ball Flexor Carpi Radialis Interposition Arthroplasty Following Trapeziectomy: A Retrospective Radiological Study}},
  author = {Veeranon Chunyawongsak and Kasidej Jongchanathavorn and Nuttapol Khajonvittayakul and Kittiwan Supichyangur},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.117119},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717259},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Single-Ball Versus Double-Ball Flexor Carpi Radialis Interposition Arthroplasty Following Trapeziectomy: A Retrospective Radiological Study
AU  - Veeranon Chunyawongsak
AU  - Kasidej Jongchanathavorn
AU  - Nuttapol Khajonvittayakul
AU  - Kittiwan Supichyangur
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.117119
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717259
AB  - Introduction The trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint represents the second most prevalent site of osteoarthritis in the hand. Following trapeziectomy, ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI) is widely considered the gold standard treatment. However, there is currently no objective radiographic evidence comparing single-ball (SB) versus double-ball (DB) flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon interposition in preventing first metacarpal collapse after surgery. Methods A total of 20 patients who underwent trapeziectomy and LRTI with an FCR graft from 2013 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed (divided into 10 SB and 10 DB cases), with a minimum radiographic follow-up of one year. Standard posteroanterior radiographs were analyzed to compare preoperative and one-year postoperative parameters, including trapezial void height (HT1 vs HT2), first metacarpal subluxation (MS1 vs MS2), and first metacarpal migration (MM1 vs MM2) measured at baseline and one year postoperatively. Results Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. At one year, the DB group showed a statistically superior trapezial void height (HT2) compared to the SB group (mean difference, -2.98 (95% CI, -5.22 to -0.74); p < 0.05). Conversely, no significant intergroup differences were found in first metacarpal subluxation (MS2) (mean difference, -0.60 (95% CI, -3.45 to 2.25); p = 0.663) or migration (MM2) (mean difference, 2.80 (95% CI, -1.43 to 7.02); p = 0.181). Conclusions At one year, the DB technique showed higher absolute trapezial void height than the SB technique. The loss of height from baseline did not differ significantly between groups. Subluxation and migration of the first metacarpal were also similar. Given baseline differences and the lack of functional data, these exploratory results do not establish superior joint space preservation or better clinical outcomes.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -