Does receiving positive or negative feedback change our memories about a decision we made?
- 1International research center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
- 2Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
Abstract
The study explored differences in decision recall between junior and senior decision-makers, focusing on accuracy (ACC) and response times (RTs) under varying feedback conditions. 117 participants completed 10 real-life decision-making scenarios, and their decision recall was examined in relation to feedback valence (positive or negative), decision-making styles, and tendencies toward Maximization. Results indicated that both junior and senior decision-makers recalled decisions with positive feedback more accurately than those with negative feedback, aligning with the “positivity bias” theory, where individuals tend to remember positive experiences more than negative ones. Seniors showed stronger recall for decisions with positive feedback but weaker for those with negative feedback compared to juniors, who performed better with negative feedback decisions recall. This pattern may reflect differences in professional experience and feedback processing across career stages, consistent with research on positivity and negativity biases. Regarding RTs, seniors had slower recall for decisions with positive feedback, potentially reflecting deeper cognitive processing, while both groups were slower to recall decisions with positive information overall. The study also found that individuals with higher Maximization tendencies, especially juniors, recalled decisions with negative feedback better, while seniors with avoidant decision-making styles were less accurate in recalling decisions with negative feedback. These findings highlight the importance of feedback delivery in professional environments and suggest that balancing positive and negative feedback is critical to maintain motivation and performance. Future research should further explore how expertise and individual differences affect decision recall and consider a neuroscientific approach to better understand the cognitive processes involved.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01390-0.
Related
- Negative memories of dental care during childhood and adolescence are strongly associated with dental anxiety in adulthood
- A lactate-HIF1-VDR positive feedback loop drives protective SPP1+ macrophage differentiation to inhibit schistosomiasis induced liver fibrosis
- Specification of bone marrow sinusoids requires TIE2-mediated positive feedback involving COUP-TFII and VEGFR3
- Social feedback structures stay/switch decision-making in Drosophila
- Cortical circuit implementation of signed deviant detection with positive and negative prediction error neurons
BibTeX
@article{allegretta2026does,
title = {{Does receiving positive or negative feedback change our memories about a decision we made?}},
author = {Roberta A. Allegretta and Flavia Ciminaghi and Laura Angioletti and Michela Balconi},
journal = {Cognitive Processing},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1007/s10339-026-01390-0},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01390-0},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Does receiving positive or negative feedback change our memories about a decision we made?
AU - Roberta A. Allegretta
AU - Flavia Ciminaghi
AU - Laura Angioletti
AU - Michela Balconi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/02
JO - Cognitive Processing
DO - 10.1007/s10339-026-01390-0
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01390-0
AB - The study explored differences in decision recall between junior and senior decision-makers, focusing on accuracy (ACC) and response times (RTs) under varying feedback conditions. 117 participants completed 10 real-life decision-making scenarios, and their decision recall was examined in relation to feedback valence (positive or negative), decision-making styles, and tendencies toward Maximization. Results indicated that both junior and senior decision-makers recalled decisions with positive feedback more accurately than those with negative feedback, aligning with the “positivity bias” theory, where individuals tend to remember positive experiences more than negative ones. Seniors showed stronger recall for decisions with positive feedback but weaker for those with negative feedback compared to juniors, who performed better with negative feedback decisions recall. This pattern may reflect differences in professional experience and feedback processing across career stages, consistent with research on positivity and negativity biases. Regarding RTs, seniors had slower recall for decisions with positive feedback, potentially reflecting deeper cognitive processing, while both groups were slower to recall decisions with positive information overall. The study also found that individuals with higher Maximization tendencies, especially juniors, recalled decisions with negative feedback better, while seniors with avoidant decision-making styles were less accurate in recalling decisions with negative feedback. These findings highlight the importance of feedback delivery in professional environments and suggest that balancing positive and negative feedback is critical to maintain motivation and performance. Future research should further explore how expertise and individual differences affect decision recall and consider a neuroscientific approach to better understand the cognitive processes involved. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01390-0.
SN - 1612-4782
SN - 1612-4790
ER -