Social feedback structures stay/switch decision-making in Drosophila
- 1Princeton University
Abstract
Within natural environments, different sensory stimuli can drive mutually-exclusive behaviors such as fighting, feeding, or courting. When experiencing competing cues, how do animals decide to continue executing the current behavior or to switch to a new behavior? To address this question, we developed a closed-loop behavioral paradigm that presents actively courting male Drosophila with a fictive heat stimulus, forcing the male to choose between two competing behaviors: continue courting (stay) or escape the heat (switch). By modeling the sensorimotor transformations underlying this decision process, we discovered that male flies continually evaluate social cues, including female speed and her distance, in order to make a stay/switch decision. We investigated the neural correlates of stay/switch decision-making via brain-wide calcium imaging in head-fixed male flies presented with both fictive female visual cues and heat stimuli. We built models that predicted stay/switch decisions from neural data, which revealed that activity in a small number of brain regions, including the anterior optic tubercle, predicted decision outcomes up to 4 seconds prior to stimulus onset, whereas after stimulus onset, distributed activity across the brain was correlated with the behavioral decision. Together, these results demonstrate that Drosophila continually evaluate social feedback to inform decisions about how to respond to environmental cues, and that brain activity changes prior to presentation of the environmental cue can inform upcoming decisions. Overall, this study provides new insight into the processes underlying naturalistic decision-making in Drosophila.
Related
- Role of leg campaniform sensilla proprioceptive feedback in Drosophila melanogaster adaptive walking
- Eco-Evolutionary Feedback to a Pesticide Worsens the Impact of a Pesticide Switch in a Pivotal Freshwater Non-Target Species.
- The complete gustatory connectome of adult Drosophila reveals how taste guides feeding, foraging, and social behavior
- Chronic Social Isolation Reshapes the Metabolome in Drosophila
- Networks of sexually dimorphic neurons that regulate social behaviors in Drosophila
BibTeX
@misc{aragon2026social,
title = {{Social feedback structures stay/switch decision-making in Drosophila}},
author = {M. J. Aragon and M. Murthy},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.01.756036},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.01.756036v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Social feedback structures stay/switch decision-making in Drosophila
AU - M. J. Aragon
AU - M. Murthy
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.01.756036
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.01.756036v1
AB - Within natural environments, different sensory stimuli can drive mutually-exclusive behaviors such as fighting, feeding, or courting. When experiencing competing cues, how do animals decide to continue executing the current behavior or to switch to a new behavior? To address this question, we developed a closed-loop behavioral paradigm that presents actively courting male Drosophila with a fictive heat stimulus, forcing the male to choose between two competing behaviors: continue courting (stay) or escape the heat (switch). By modeling the sensorimotor transformations underlying this decision process, we discovered that male flies continually evaluate social cues, including female speed and her distance, in order to make a stay/switch decision. We investigated the neural correlates of stay/switch decision-making via brain-wide calcium imaging in head-fixed male flies presented with both fictive female visual cues and heat stimuli. We built models that predicted stay/switch decisions from neural data, which revealed that activity in a small number of brain regions, including the anterior optic tubercle, predicted decision outcomes up to 4 seconds prior to stimulus onset, whereas after stimulus onset, distributed activity across the brain was correlated with the behavioral decision. Together, these results demonstrate that Drosophila continually evaluate social feedback to inform decisions about how to respond to environmental cues, and that brain activity changes prior to presentation of the environmental cue can inform upcoming decisions. Overall, this study provides new insight into the processes underlying naturalistic decision-making in Drosophila.
ER -