Cover crop management influences soil properties and grapevine performance across three growing seasons in a subtropical vineyard
4 affiliations
- 1Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- 2Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- 3Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém, Pará, Brazil
- 4Semmear Agrofloresta, Campo Largo, Paraná, Brazil
Abstract
Cover crop management can modify soil conditions and grapevine performance, but these responses may depend on the vegetation-management strategy and growing season. This study evaluated the effects of different cover crop management systems on soil, physiological, yield, and fruit technological variables of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Viognier cultivated in Campo Largo, Paraná, Brazil, for three growing seasons (2023–2026; 2023/24, 2024/25, and 2025/26). The treatments were: T1, spontaneous vegetation (white clover in winter and Cynodon spp in summer) with herbicide application in the vine row; T2, spontaneous vegetation without herbicide; T3, black oat in winter and predominantly white clover + angola grass in summer; T4, common vetch in winter and mombaça grass in summer; and T5, multispecies cover crop mixtures in winter (black oat + rye + vetch + forage radish) and summer (Cynodon ssp + buckwheat + mombaça grass). Cover crop biomass and macronutrient accumulation, soil chemical and physical properties, soil water content, and grapevine nutritional, physiological, vegetative, yield, and technological variables were evaluated. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models accounting for repeated measurements across growing seasons, complemented by multivariate analyses. T4 (vetch and mombaça) and T5 (oats + rye + vetch + forage radish; and Cynodon ssp + buckwheat + mombaça) generally showed greater biomass production and accumulation of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg than systems based on spontaneous vegetation. Vegetation management also affected selected surface-soil properties, particularly available P, total organic carbon, total N, cation exchange capacity, bulk density, and soil water content, although responses varied among growing seasons. Grapevine leaf area (LA) and the Yield/LA ratio did not differ among treatments, whereas physiological responses were treatment- and season-dependent. The clearest yield response occurred in 2025/26, when T2 and T4 reached 11.06 and 11.12 Mg ha−1, respectively, approximately 20% greater than T1 (9.21 Mg ha−1). Soluble solids and pH were unaffected by vegetation management, and differences in titratable acidity occurred only in 2023/24. Global multivariate profiles differed among treatments but were strongly season-dependent. Overall, sown cover crops increased biomass production, nutrient accumulation, and selected surface-soil attributes, but these responses did not consistently translate into greater grapevine yield or fruit technological maturity within the 3-year experimental period.
Related
- Association between soil properties and Grapevine Leaf Stripe Disease (Esca Complex) symptom expression. Part I: soil physical, hydrological and chemical characteristics
- Long-Term Effects of Vineyard Floor Vegetation Management on Grapevine Physiology, Yield and Wine Color Attributes Under Mediterranean Conditions
- Sodium nitrophenolates as a potential tool for the management of grapevine trunk diseases
- Long-term performance of disease-resistant grapevine varieties: insights from an 8-year field monitoring across French vineyards
- Evaluating the influences of fishmeal replacement on growth, immune and nutritional performance in aquaculture
BibTeX
@article{teixeiraloss2026cover,
title = {{Cover crop management influences soil properties and grapevine performance across three growing seasons in a subtropical vineyard}},
author = {Michelle Barbosa Teixeira-Loss and Bruna da Rosa Dutra and Fernanda Wilkens Costa and Aline Dapont Goedel and Maria Gabrielle Carniel de Oliveira and Carolina Muller Zimmermann and Maria Eduarda Botelho de Souza and Adriano Eidi Tokushima and Loisiana Feuser dos Santos and Guilherme Wilbert Ferreira and José Luiz Marcon Filho and Arcângelo Loss and Alberto Fontanella Brighenti},
journal = {Frontiers in Environmental Science},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fenvs.2026.1895755},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1895755},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Cover crop management influences soil properties and grapevine performance across three growing seasons in a subtropical vineyard
AU - Michelle Barbosa Teixeira-Loss
AU - Bruna da Rosa Dutra
AU - Fernanda Wilkens Costa
AU - Aline Dapont Goedel
AU - Maria Gabrielle Carniel de Oliveira
AU - Carolina Muller Zimmermann
AU - Maria Eduarda Botelho de Souza
AU - Adriano Eidi Tokushima
AU - Loisiana Feuser dos Santos
AU - Guilherme Wilbert Ferreira
AU - José Luiz Marcon Filho
AU - Arcângelo Loss
AU - Alberto Fontanella Brighenti
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Frontiers in Environmental Science
DO - 10.3389/fenvs.2026.1895755
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1895755
AB - Cover crop management can modify soil conditions and grapevine performance, but these responses may depend on the vegetation-management strategy and growing season. This study evaluated the effects of different cover crop management systems on soil, physiological, yield, and fruit technological variables of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Viognier cultivated in Campo Largo, Paraná, Brazil, for three growing seasons (2023–2026; 2023/24, 2024/25, and 2025/26). The treatments were: T1, spontaneous vegetation (white clover in winter and Cynodon spp in summer) with herbicide application in the vine row; T2, spontaneous vegetation without herbicide; T3, black oat in winter and predominantly white clover + angola grass in summer; T4, common vetch in winter and mombaça grass in summer; and T5, multispecies cover crop mixtures in winter (black oat + rye + vetch + forage radish) and summer (Cynodon ssp + buckwheat + mombaça grass). Cover crop biomass and macronutrient accumulation, soil chemical and physical properties, soil water content, and grapevine nutritional, physiological, vegetative, yield, and technological variables were evaluated. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models accounting for repeated measurements across growing seasons, complemented by multivariate analyses. T4 (vetch and mombaça) and T5 (oats + rye + vetch + forage radish; and Cynodon ssp + buckwheat + mombaça) generally showed greater biomass production and accumulation of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg than systems based on spontaneous vegetation. Vegetation management also affected selected surface-soil properties, particularly available P, total organic carbon, total N, cation exchange capacity, bulk density, and soil water content, although responses varied among growing seasons. Grapevine leaf area (LA) and the Yield/LA ratio did not differ among treatments, whereas physiological responses were treatment- and season-dependent. The clearest yield response occurred in 2025/26, when T2 and T4 reached 11.06 and 11.12 Mg ha−1, respectively, approximately 20% greater than T1 (9.21 Mg ha−1). Soluble solids and pH were unaffected by vegetation management, and differences in titratable acidity occurred only in 2023/24. Global multivariate profiles differed among treatments but were strongly season-dependent. Overall, sown cover crops increased biomass production, nutrient accumulation, and selected surface-soil attributes, but these responses did not consistently translate into greater grapevine yield or fruit technological maturity within the 3-year experimental period.
SN - 2296-665X
ER -