A Systematic Scoping Review of Participant Descriptor, Diversity and Inclusivity Data Reported in Randomised Studies of Post‐Operative Ileus
- 1Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds Leeds UK
Abstract
Background: Poor reporting of baseline descriptor, diversity and inclusion data is a barrier in surgical research for drawing generalisable conclusions across diverse populations. Post‐operative ileus was used as an exemplar surgical condition to quantify the variation in baseline descriptor, inclusivity and diversity data in randomised controlled trials and to identify targets for improved reporting for baseline descriptors.
Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was performed to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the context of post‐operative ileus after abdominal surgery. Two assessors independently screened studies. Baseline descriptors, including diversity and inclusion descriptors, were extracted and summarised. A narrative synthesis quantified variation and explored targets for improvement.
Results: Of 4887 studies initially identified, 211 met inclusion criteria, and 184 were accessible for inclusion. A total of 92 unique descriptors were identified. The median number of descriptors per RCT was 6 (IQR: 4–8). Characteristics known to predispose patients to ileus, including baseline opioids (n = 4/184; 2.2%) and previous surgery (n = 38/184; 20.7%), were uncommonly reported. The most common characteristics were age (n = 181/184; 98.4%) and one of either sex or gender (n = 152/184; 82.6%). A total of 18 (9.8%) RCTs reported participants' ethnic group, described variably as ‘race’ or ‘ethnicity’. No studies reported physical disability.
Conclusions: Substantial heterogeneity exists in the reporting of baseline participant descriptors in the common surgical context of post‐operative ileus. Data relating to diversity and inclusion is seldom reported and difficult to interpret. Homogenising the reporting of these data will improve the comparability and representativeness of future results.
Related
- Vitamin D supplementation to prevent tuberculosis infection and disease: systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Co-production of a consensus-based inclusivity checklist to promote inclusion and diversity in clinical research: a multi-method study
- Do participant testimony videos make people more interested in taking part in a clinical trial? A randomised Study Within a Trial (SWAT), registration SWAT203
- Long-term participant-reported outcomes after the GeneRAtiNg StUdent recruiters for randomised triaLs (GRANULE) course: a longitudinal, survey-based, international cohort study
- Robotic-arm-assisted versus conventional total knee replacement (RACER-Knee): a pragmatic, multicentre, participant-masked and assessor-masked, superiority, randomised controlled trial
BibTeX
@article{khalil2026systematic,
title = {{A Systematic Scoping Review of Participant Descriptor, Diversity and Inclusivity Data Reported in Randomised Studies of Post‐Operative Ileus}},
author = {Miriam Khalil and Edward Roberts and David G. Jayne and Stephen J. Chapman},
journal = {Anz Journal of Surgery},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1111/ans.70777},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70777},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A Systematic Scoping Review of Participant Descriptor, Diversity and Inclusivity Data Reported in Randomised Studies of Post‐Operative Ileus
AU - Miriam Khalil
AU - Edward Roberts
AU - David G. Jayne
AU - Stephen J. Chapman
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/11
JO - Anz Journal of Surgery
DO - 10.1111/ans.70777
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70777
AB - Background: Poor reporting of baseline descriptor, diversity and inclusion data is a barrier in surgical research for drawing generalisable conclusions across diverse populations. Post‐operative ileus was used as an exemplar surgical condition to quantify the variation in baseline descriptor, inclusivity and diversity data in randomised controlled trials and to identify targets for improved reporting for baseline descriptors. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was performed to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the context of post‐operative ileus after abdominal surgery. Two assessors independently screened studies. Baseline descriptors, including diversity and inclusion descriptors, were extracted and summarised. A narrative synthesis quantified variation and explored targets for improvement. Results: Of 4887 studies initially identified, 211 met inclusion criteria, and 184 were accessible for inclusion. A total of 92 unique descriptors were identified. The median number of descriptors per RCT was 6 (IQR: 4–8). Characteristics known to predispose patients to ileus, including baseline opioids (n = 4/184; 2.2%) and previous surgery (n = 38/184; 20.7%), were uncommonly reported. The most common characteristics were age (n = 181/184; 98.4%) and one of either sex or gender (n = 152/184; 82.6%). A total of 18 (9.8%) RCTs reported participants' ethnic group, described variably as ‘race’ or ‘ethnicity’. No studies reported physical disability. Conclusions: Substantial heterogeneity exists in the reporting of baseline participant descriptors in the common surgical context of post‐operative ileus. Data relating to diversity and inclusion is seldom reported and difficult to interpret. Homogenising the reporting of these data will improve the comparability and representativeness of future results.
SN - 1445-1433
SN - 1445-2197
ER -