Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,625 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Royal Society Open Science

Concordance of next-generation sequencing and conventional microbiology for pathogen detection and antimicrobial resistance prediction in pneumonia

4 affiliations
  1. 1Kazakhstan-Japan Innovation Centre, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU) 1 , Almaty, Kazakhstan
  2. 2Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University 3 , Astana, Kazakhstan
  3. 3Research Laboratory, Karaganda Medical University 4 , Karaganda, Kazakhstan
  4. 4International Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU) 2 , Almaty, Kazakhstan

Abstract

Delays in pathogen and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiling adversely affect patient outcomes. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may complement conventional microbiology (CM), yet real-world value of NGS in pneumonia diagnosis remains unclear. We quantified concordance between a commercial NGS panel and CM for pathogen detection and genotypic AMR prediction in 48 pneumonia inpatients with culture-confirmed infections. Archived sputum was analysed using the Ion AmpliSeq Pan-Bacterial targeted panel with 16S rRNA profiling. CM comprised culture, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) identification and disc-diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing. NGS recovered 27/50 pathogens detected by CM (54.0%, 95% CI 40.4–67.0), with more organisms per sample than CM (mean 2.42 versus 1.04), including uncultured taxa, indicating broader detection. AMR sensitivity of NGS was low (41.2%, 105/255; 95% CI 35.3–47.3; ranging from 1.1% for fluoroquinolones to 100% for cephamycins/lincosamides/tetracyclines) and remained low (37.6–69.8%) across alternative read and abundance cut-offs. Overall, the commercial NGS panel expanded pathogen detection beyond culture but showed only moderate concordance with CM and limited sensitivity for AMR phenotypes; it is therefore best regarded as an adjunct to CM and phenotypic susceptibility testing in pneumonia, not a replacement.

Related

  1. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of matched donor–recipient pairs reveals pathogen transmission dynamics and informs antimicrobial therapy in liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
    Shuai Feng, Jinquan Liu, Xiaojing Zhang +7
    Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  2. Comparative Microbiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacterial Isolates from Wound Specimens at Tertiary-Care Centres in Ghana and Germany: A Retrospective Two-Centre Study.
    Edward Kwame Agyekum, Johanna Thiele, Mohammed Issah Suglo Bukari +5
    Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Focused Update to International Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Prolonged‐Infusion Beta‐Lactam Antibiotics Among Severely Ill Adult Patients: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists
    Lisa Hong, Alireza Fakhriravari, Marta Ulldemolins +3
    Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyHAL
  4. Assessing diagnostic concordance between rapid on-site evaluation and final histopathology in mediastinal lesions using conventional and endobronchial ultrasound-guided TBNA
    Fatma Hafez, Ashraf Madkour, Wael Emam
    The Egyptian Journal of BronchologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  5. Guideline Concordance and Antimicrobial Stewardship in Community Pharmacy Management of Suspected Pediatric Acute Otitis Media: A Simulated Patient Study in Saudi Arabia.
    Faris S Alnezary, Nadia M Aljuhani, Shuruq S Almurashi +6
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{sandybayev2026concordance,
  title = {{Concordance of next-generation sequencing and conventional microbiology for pathogen detection and antimicrobial resistance prediction in pneumonia}},
  author = {Nurlan Sandybayev and Radmir Sarsenov and Vitaliy Strochkov and Alyona Lavrinenko and Vyacheslav Beloussov and Maxim Solomadin and Shynggys Orkara and Sergey Yegorov},
  journal = {Royal Society Open Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1098/rsos.260772},
  url = {https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/9/260772/483434/Concordance-of-next-generation-sequencing-and},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Concordance of next-generation sequencing and conventional microbiology for pathogen detection and antimicrobial resistance prediction in pneumonia
AU  - Nurlan Sandybayev
AU  - Radmir Sarsenov
AU  - Vitaliy Strochkov
AU  - Alyona Lavrinenko
AU  - Vyacheslav Beloussov
AU  - Maxim Solomadin
AU  - Shynggys Orkara
AU  - Sergey Yegorov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Royal Society Open Science
DO  - 10.1098/rsos.260772
UR  - https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/9/260772/483434/Concordance-of-next-generation-sequencing-and
AB  - Delays in pathogen and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiling adversely affect patient outcomes. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may complement conventional microbiology (CM), yet real-world value of NGS in pneumonia diagnosis remains unclear. We quantified concordance between a commercial NGS panel and CM for pathogen detection and genotypic AMR prediction in 48 pneumonia inpatients with culture-confirmed infections. Archived sputum was analysed using the Ion AmpliSeq Pan-Bacterial targeted panel with 16S rRNA profiling. CM comprised culture, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) identification and disc-diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing. NGS recovered 27/50 pathogens detected by CM (54.0%, 95% CI 40.4–67.0), with more organisms per sample than CM (mean 2.42 versus 1.04), including uncultured taxa, indicating broader detection. AMR sensitivity of NGS was low (41.2%, 105/255; 95% CI 35.3–47.3; ranging from 1.1% for fluoroquinolones to 100% for cephamycins/lincosamides/tetracyclines) and remained low (37.6–69.8%) across alternative read and abundance cut-offs. Overall, the commercial NGS panel expanded pathogen detection beyond culture but showed only moderate concordance with CM and limited sensitivity for AMR phenotypes; it is therefore best regarded as an adjunct to CM and phenotypic susceptibility testing in pneumonia, not a replacement.
SN  - 2054-5703
ER  -