Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in pharmacology

Differential effects of nAChR modulators on impulsive action in a nicotine self-administration Go/No-Go task in rats.

  1. 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
  2. 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Dallas, TX, United States.

Abstract

Introduction

Tobacco use disorder is a chronic condition characterized by compulsive nicotine use, withdrawal, and relapse following abstinence. Impulsivity contributes to persistent nicotine use and poor cessation outcomes. This study examined whether nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) modulators alter impulsive action in a nicotine self-administration Go/No-Go task in male and female rats.Methods

Rats acquired intravenous nicotine self-administration and were then trained in a Go/No-Go procedure in which active lever presses were reinforced during Go periods but not during No-Go periods. Impulsive action was quantified as the percentage of active lever responses during No-Go periods relative to total active responses. We then assessed the effects of varenicline (0.1-3 mg/kg), nicotine (0.1-0.6 mg/kg), and the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine (0.5-2 mg/kg) in the Go/No-Go procedure.Results

Varenicline and nicotine pretreatment reduced active responding during both Go and No-Go periods, whereas mecamylamine selectively reduced responding during No-Go periods. Mecamylamine decreased the percentage of active responses during No-Go trials, indicating reduced impulsive action during nicotine self-administration. In contrast, nicotine and varenicline did not alter response allocation, suggesting that their effects reflected nonspecific reductions in responding rather than changes in impulsive action. No sex differences were observed. Substituting saline for nicotine during self-administration did not alter active responding during Go periods, but rats in the saline group had fewer active responses during No-Go periods than rats in the nicotine group.Discussion

These results demonstrate differential effects of nAChR modulators on impulsive action during nicotine self-administration. This work supports the utility of Go/No-Go self-administration task for investigating nAChR-dependent modulation of impulsive action during nicotine self-administration.

Related

  1. Exercise and immune system as modulators of intestinal microbiome: implications for the gut-muscle axis hypothesis
    Andrea Ticinesi, Fulvio Lauretani, Claudio Tana +3
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not stated146 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
  2. Minor Phytocannabinoids as Candidate Multi-Target Modulators of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Linked Proteostasis Failure in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Mechanistic Review
    Hyewon Lee, Sang-Hyuck Park, Han-Jung Chae
    BiomoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
  3. Evolution of KRAS molecular glues: from allele-selective to Pan-RAS and protein–protein interaction modulators
    Xuan-zheng Xiao, Yun-jie Wang, Xiu-feng Pang +1
    Acta Pharmacologica SinicaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  4. The Endogenous Negative Allosteric Modulator, Lynx1, Inhibits Nicotinic Cholinergic Signaling in the Ventral Tegmental Area to Regulate Nicotine Reinforcement
    Yasmine Sherafat, Malia Bautista, Kendyl N. Laumann +6
    The Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  5. Nicotine biosynthesis is completed by cryptic activating glucosylation
    Benjamin T. W. Schwabe, Isabelle Angstman, Katharina Vollheyde +8
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text12 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{chellian2026differential,
  title = {{Differential effects of nAChR modulators on impulsive action in a nicotine self-administration Go/No-Go task in rats.}},
  author = {Ranjithkumar Chellian and Guido Huisman and Lara Caglayan and Adriaan W Bruijnzeel},
  journal = {Frontiers in pharmacology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3389/fphar.2026.1883945},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42835367},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Differential effects of nAChR modulators on impulsive action in a nicotine self-administration Go/No-Go task in rats.
AU  - Ranjithkumar Chellian
AU  - Guido Huisman
AU  - Lara Caglayan
AU  - Adriaan W Bruijnzeel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
JO  - Frontiers in pharmacology
DO  - 10.3389/fphar.2026.1883945
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42835367
AB  - Introduction  Tobacco use disorder is a chronic condition characterized by compulsive nicotine use, withdrawal, and relapse following abstinence. Impulsivity contributes to persistent nicotine use and poor cessation outcomes. This study examined whether nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) modulators alter impulsive action in a nicotine self-administration Go/No-Go task in male and female rats.Methods  Rats acquired intravenous nicotine self-administration and were then trained in a Go/No-Go procedure in which active lever presses were reinforced during Go periods but not during No-Go periods. Impulsive action was quantified as the percentage of active lever responses during No-Go periods relative to total active responses. We then assessed the effects of varenicline (0.1-3 mg/kg), nicotine (0.1-0.6 mg/kg), and the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine (0.5-2 mg/kg) in the Go/No-Go procedure.Results  Varenicline and nicotine pretreatment reduced active responding during both Go and No-Go periods, whereas mecamylamine selectively reduced responding during No-Go periods. Mecamylamine decreased the percentage of active responses during No-Go trials, indicating reduced impulsive action during nicotine self-administration. In contrast, nicotine and varenicline did not alter response allocation, suggesting that their effects reflected nonspecific reductions in responding rather than changes in impulsive action. No sex differences were observed. Substituting saline for nicotine during self-administration did not alter active responding during Go periods, but rats in the saline group had fewer active responses during No-Go periods than rats in the nicotine group.Discussion  These results demonstrate differential effects of nAChR modulators on impulsive action during nicotine self-administration. This work supports the utility of Go/No-Go self-administration task for investigating nAChR-dependent modulation of impulsive action during nicotine self-administration.
SN  - 1663-9812
ER  -