Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in genetics

Authorship responsibilities of scientists who use AI research agents.

  • David B Resnik1
  • Mohammad Hosseini2,3
  • Robert T Pennock4
4 affiliations
  1. 1National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Durham, NC, United States.
  2. 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
  3. 3Galter Health Sciences Library, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
  4. 4Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) tools capable of performing research independently, which we call AI research agents (AIRAs) is likely to significantly impact how science is planned, performed, reviewed, evaluated, and communicated. However, the expected gains in efficiency and productivity from the deployment of AIRAs should not undermine science's epistemic and ethical values, such as accountability, transparency, reproducibility, and rigor. In this paper, we revisit the AI authorship debate in light of the reported capabilities of AIRAs and argue that these tools do not qualify for authorship because they cannot be held morally responsible for their contributions. We also reject the use of the term "scientist" to refer to these tools and argue that human scientists who use AIRAs have three key authorship responsibilities: (1) to carefully oversee and manage AIRAs; (2) to accurately and appropriately disclose AIRAs' contribution to research; and (3) to be accountable for research involving AIRAs by addressing questions and concerns raised by the scientific community and the public. Finally, we consider some related researcher responsibilities that are topics for future research, including the obligation to monitor, audit, and evaluate the performance of AIRAs and the obligation to address the social, economic, legal, and environmental implications of using AIRAs.

Related

  1. LabAgent: Customize Any Research Hubs for Scientific Discoveries Using AI Agents
    Lei Liu, Yikun Zhang, Jialin Chen +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textBiophysicsarXiv
  2. The more you automate, the less you see: Hidden pitfalls of autonomous AI scientists.
    Ziming Luo, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Nihar B Shah
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  3. Scientists disrupt less but more persistently with career aging
    Nan Deng, Liying Yang, Shlomo Havlin +1
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  4. Benchmarking AI scientists for omics data–driven biological discovery
    Erpai Luo, Jinmeng Jia, Yifan Xiong +6
    BioinformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BY25 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
  5. Anti-Glioma Agents and Hyperbaric Oxygen for Prospective Therapeutic Approaches
    Emanuela B. Pucko, Jakub Godlewski, Natalia Kaźmierczak +1
    International journal of molecular sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{resnik2026authorship,
  title = {{Authorship responsibilities of scientists who use AI research agents.}},
  author = {David B Resnik and Mohammad Hosseini and Robert T Pennock},
  journal = {Frontiers in genetics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fgene.2026.1954843},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908681},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Authorship responsibilities of scientists who use AI research agents.
AU  - David B Resnik
AU  - Mohammad Hosseini
AU  - Robert T Pennock
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Frontiers in genetics
DO  - 10.3389/fgene.2026.1954843
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908681
AB  - The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) tools capable of performing research independently, which we call AI research agents (AIRAs) is likely to significantly impact how science is planned, performed, reviewed, evaluated, and communicated. However, the expected gains in efficiency and productivity from the deployment of AIRAs should not undermine science's epistemic and ethical values, such as accountability, transparency, reproducibility, and rigor. In this paper, we revisit the AI authorship debate in light of the reported capabilities of AIRAs and argue that these tools do not qualify for authorship because they cannot be held morally responsible for their contributions. We also reject the use of the term "scientist" to refer to these tools and argue that human scientists who use AIRAs have three key authorship responsibilities: (1) to carefully oversee and manage AIRAs; (2) to accurately and appropriately disclose AIRAs' contribution to research; and (3) to be accountable for research involving AIRAs by addressing questions and concerns raised by the scientific community and the public. Finally, we consider some related researcher responsibilities that are topics for future research, including the obligation to monitor, audit, and evaluate the performance of AIRAs and the obligation to address the social, economic, legal, and environmental implications of using AIRAs.
SN  - 1664-8021
ER  -