Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJTO Clinical and Research Reports

Real-World Evidence of First- or Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Prospective Pragmatic Multicenter Korean Study

7 more authors
12 affiliations
  1. 1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  2. 2Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Institute of Medical Science, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea
  3. 3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hemato-Oncology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
  4. 4Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  5. 5Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  6. 6Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
  7. 7Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
  8. 8Department of Hemato-oncololgy, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  9. 9Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  10. 10Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
  11. 11Department of Statistics, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
  12. 12Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Corresponding author. Address for correspondence: Myung-Ju Ahn, MD, PhD, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. However, prospective real-world evidence comparing ICI-based therapy with chemotherapy remains limited. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of ICI-based regimens versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: In this nationwide prospective pragmatic study, patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received first- or second-line ICIs with or without chemotherapy (ICI ± C) or chemotherapy alone were included. The ICI ± C cohort was prospectively enrolled, whereas the chemotherapy cohort was retrospectively assembled as a historical control. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, safety, and subgroup analyses. Results: Among 1520 patients, 1234 received first-line therapy (ICI ± C, N = 525; chemotherapy, n = 709) and 286 received second-line therapy (ICI, n = 262; chemotherapy, n = 24). In the first-line setting, ICI ± C significantly improved survival compared with chemotherapy, with a median PFS of 8.1 versus 5.1 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.52–0.67) and a median OS of 20.1 versus 9.0 months (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.40–0.54). The objective response rate was 41.0% with ICI ± C and 11.4% with chemotherapy. In the second-line setting, PFS was similar (2.1 versus 3.6 mo; HR = 1.05), whereas OS was longer with ICIs (10.9 versus 6.0 mo; HR = 0.60). Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed that ICI ± C remained independently associated with improved survival (adjusted HR = 0.44 for OS and 0.58 for PFS). Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with ICI ± C but were generally manageable. Conclusion: In this large prospective real-world cohort, ICI-based therapy significantly improved survival outcomes compared with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, particularly in the first-line setting, supporting the effectiveness of immunotherapy-based strategies in routine clinical practice.

Related

  1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for early triple‐negative breast cancer
    Ya Gao, Ming Liu, Lun Li +3
    The Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. 971 The impact of liver metastases on immune-related adverse events in stage IV patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world, multicenter, retrospective study
    Adil Alaoui, Jessica A Catterson, Michael B Atkins +4
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  3. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Li Zhang, Chengfeng Liu, Juan Zhang +6
    Journal of gastrointestinal oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Cardiotoxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Anthracycline Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    Nolan Holley, Syed Ahmad, Gary Monroe +4
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  5. Distinct changes in plasma protein profiles of cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy: implications for thrombosis risk and adverse outcomes
    Eleonora Camilleri, Nikola Vladic, Cornelia Englisch +10
    Research and Practice in Thrombosis and HaemostasisPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{jinyongkim2026realworld,
  title = {{Real-World Evidence of First- or Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Prospective Pragmatic Multicenter Korean Study}},
  author = {Jinyong Kim, MD, PhD and Sehhoon Park, MD, PhD and Gyeong-Won Lee, MD, PhD and Il-Hwan Kim, MD, PhD and Dong-Wan Kim, MD, PhD and Yun-Gyoo Lee, MD, PhD and Jang Ho Cho, MD, PhD and Eun-Kyung Cho, MD, PhD and Hyun Woo Lee, MD, PhD and Ji-Hyun Park, MD, PhD and Eun Joo Kang, MD, PhD and Youngjoo Lee, MD, PhD and Nak-Hoon Son, PhD and So Hyeon Gwon, MS and Hyun Ae Jung, MD, PhD and Jong-Mu Sun, MD, PhD and Se-Hoon Lee, MD, PhD and Jin Seok Ahn, MD, PhD and Myung-Ju Ahn, MD, PhD},
  journal = {JTO Clinical and Research Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jtocrr.2026.101064},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2026.101064},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Real-World Evidence of First- or Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Prospective Pragmatic Multicenter Korean Study
AU  - Jinyong Kim, MD, PhD
AU  - Sehhoon Park, MD, PhD
AU  - Gyeong-Won Lee, MD, PhD
AU  - Il-Hwan Kim, MD, PhD
AU  - Dong-Wan Kim, MD, PhD
AU  - Yun-Gyoo Lee, MD, PhD
AU  - Jang Ho Cho, MD, PhD
AU  - Eun-Kyung Cho, MD, PhD
AU  - Hyun Woo Lee, MD, PhD
AU  - Ji-Hyun Park, MD, PhD
AU  - Eun Joo Kang, MD, PhD
AU  - Youngjoo Lee, MD, PhD
AU  - Nak-Hoon Son, PhD
AU  - So Hyeon Gwon, MS
AU  - Hyun Ae Jung, MD, PhD
AU  - Jong-Mu Sun, MD, PhD
AU  - Se-Hoon Lee, MD, PhD
AU  - Jin Seok Ahn, MD, PhD
AU  - Myung-Ju Ahn, MD, PhD
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/21
JO  - JTO Clinical and Research Reports
DO  - 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2026.101064
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2026.101064
AB  - Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. However, prospective real-world evidence comparing ICI-based therapy with chemotherapy remains limited. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of ICI-based regimens versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: In this nationwide prospective pragmatic study, patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received first- or second-line ICIs with or without chemotherapy (ICI ± C) or chemotherapy alone were included. The ICI ± C cohort was prospectively enrolled, whereas the chemotherapy cohort was retrospectively assembled as a historical control. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, safety, and subgroup analyses. Results: Among 1520 patients, 1234 received first-line therapy (ICI ± C, N = 525; chemotherapy, n = 709) and 286 received second-line therapy (ICI, n = 262; chemotherapy, n = 24). In the first-line setting, ICI ± C significantly improved survival compared with chemotherapy, with a median PFS of 8.1 versus 5.1 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.52–0.67) and a median OS of 20.1 versus 9.0 months (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.40–0.54). The objective response rate was 41.0% with ICI ± C and 11.4% with chemotherapy. In the second-line setting, PFS was similar (2.1 versus 3.6 mo; HR = 1.05), whereas OS was longer with ICIs (10.9 versus 6.0 mo; HR = 0.60). Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed that ICI ± C remained independently associated with improved survival (adjusted HR = 0.44 for OS and 0.58 for PFS). Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with ICI ± C but were generally manageable. Conclusion: In this large prospective real-world cohort, ICI-based therapy significantly improved survival outcomes compared with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, particularly in the first-line setting, supporting the effectiveness of immunotherapy-based strategies in routine clinical practice.
SN  - 2666-3643
ER  -