Real-World Evidence of First- or Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Prospective Pragmatic Multicenter Korean Study
12 affiliations
- 1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Institute of Medical Science, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea
- 3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hemato-Oncology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
- 4Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 5Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 6Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
- 7Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
- 8Department of Hemato-oncololgy, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 9Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 10Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- 11Department of Statistics, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- 12Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Corresponding author. Address for correspondence: Myung-Ju Ahn, MD, PhD, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. However, prospective real-world evidence comparing ICI-based therapy with chemotherapy remains limited. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of ICI-based regimens versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: In this nationwide prospective pragmatic study, patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received first- or second-line ICIs with or without chemotherapy (ICI ± C) or chemotherapy alone were included. The ICI ± C cohort was prospectively enrolled, whereas the chemotherapy cohort was retrospectively assembled as a historical control. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, safety, and subgroup analyses. Results: Among 1520 patients, 1234 received first-line therapy (ICI ± C, N = 525; chemotherapy, n = 709) and 286 received second-line therapy (ICI, n = 262; chemotherapy, n = 24). In the first-line setting, ICI ± C significantly improved survival compared with chemotherapy, with a median PFS of 8.1 versus 5.1 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.52–0.67) and a median OS of 20.1 versus 9.0 months (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.40–0.54). The objective response rate was 41.0% with ICI ± C and 11.4% with chemotherapy. In the second-line setting, PFS was similar (2.1 versus 3.6 mo; HR = 1.05), whereas OS was longer with ICIs (10.9 versus 6.0 mo; HR = 0.60). Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed that ICI ± C remained independently associated with improved survival (adjusted HR = 0.44 for OS and 0.58 for PFS). Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with ICI ± C but were generally manageable. Conclusion: In this large prospective real-world cohort, ICI-based therapy significantly improved survival outcomes compared with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, particularly in the first-line setting, supporting the effectiveness of immunotherapy-based strategies in routine clinical practice.
Related
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for early triple‐negative breast cancer
- 971 The impact of liver metastases on immune-related adverse events in stage IV patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world, multicenter, retrospective study
- Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
- Cardiotoxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Anthracycline Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
- Distinct changes in plasma protein profiles of cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy: implications for thrombosis risk and adverse outcomes
BibTeX
@article{jinyongkim2026realworld,
title = {{Real-World Evidence of First- or Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Prospective Pragmatic Multicenter Korean Study}},
author = {Jinyong Kim, MD, PhD and Sehhoon Park, MD, PhD and Gyeong-Won Lee, MD, PhD and Il-Hwan Kim, MD, PhD and Dong-Wan Kim, MD, PhD and Yun-Gyoo Lee, MD, PhD and Jang Ho Cho, MD, PhD and Eun-Kyung Cho, MD, PhD and Hyun Woo Lee, MD, PhD and Ji-Hyun Park, MD, PhD and Eun Joo Kang, MD, PhD and Youngjoo Lee, MD, PhD and Nak-Hoon Son, PhD and So Hyeon Gwon, MS and Hyun Ae Jung, MD, PhD and Jong-Mu Sun, MD, PhD and Se-Hoon Lee, MD, PhD and Jin Seok Ahn, MD, PhD and Myung-Ju Ahn, MD, PhD},
journal = {JTO Clinical and Research Reports},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1016/j.jtocrr.2026.101064},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2026.101064},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Real-World Evidence of First- or Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Prospective Pragmatic Multicenter Korean Study
AU - Jinyong Kim, MD, PhD
AU - Sehhoon Park, MD, PhD
AU - Gyeong-Won Lee, MD, PhD
AU - Il-Hwan Kim, MD, PhD
AU - Dong-Wan Kim, MD, PhD
AU - Yun-Gyoo Lee, MD, PhD
AU - Jang Ho Cho, MD, PhD
AU - Eun-Kyung Cho, MD, PhD
AU - Hyun Woo Lee, MD, PhD
AU - Ji-Hyun Park, MD, PhD
AU - Eun Joo Kang, MD, PhD
AU - Youngjoo Lee, MD, PhD
AU - Nak-Hoon Son, PhD
AU - So Hyeon Gwon, MS
AU - Hyun Ae Jung, MD, PhD
AU - Jong-Mu Sun, MD, PhD
AU - Se-Hoon Lee, MD, PhD
AU - Jin Seok Ahn, MD, PhD
AU - Myung-Ju Ahn, MD, PhD
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/21
JO - JTO Clinical and Research Reports
DO - 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2026.101064
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2026.101064
AB - Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. However, prospective real-world evidence comparing ICI-based therapy with chemotherapy remains limited. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of ICI-based regimens versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: In this nationwide prospective pragmatic study, patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received first- or second-line ICIs with or without chemotherapy (ICI ± C) or chemotherapy alone were included. The ICI ± C cohort was prospectively enrolled, whereas the chemotherapy cohort was retrospectively assembled as a historical control. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, safety, and subgroup analyses. Results: Among 1520 patients, 1234 received first-line therapy (ICI ± C, N = 525; chemotherapy, n = 709) and 286 received second-line therapy (ICI, n = 262; chemotherapy, n = 24). In the first-line setting, ICI ± C significantly improved survival compared with chemotherapy, with a median PFS of 8.1 versus 5.1 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.52–0.67) and a median OS of 20.1 versus 9.0 months (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.40–0.54). The objective response rate was 41.0% with ICI ± C and 11.4% with chemotherapy. In the second-line setting, PFS was similar (2.1 versus 3.6 mo; HR = 1.05), whereas OS was longer with ICIs (10.9 versus 6.0 mo; HR = 0.60). Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed that ICI ± C remained independently associated with improved survival (adjusted HR = 0.44 for OS and 0.58 for PFS). Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with ICI ± C but were generally manageable. Conclusion: In this large prospective real-world cohort, ICI-based therapy significantly improved survival outcomes compared with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, particularly in the first-line setting, supporting the effectiveness of immunotherapy-based strategies in routine clinical practice.
SN - 2666-3643
ER -