Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Elucidating the toxicogenomic mechanisms of DBP exposure on Hepatocellular carcinoma through network toxicology and molecular docking analysis

  1. 1Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  2. 2Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, Anhui, China.

Abstract

Backgroud: This study explored the molecular mechanisms by which dibutyl phthalate (DBP) contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) pathogenesis using integrated network toxicology and bioinformatics. Methods: DBP’s carcinogenic potential was evaluated with ADMETLAB 3.0 and ProTox3. DBP-related targets were obtained from ChEMBL, SwissTargetPrediction, and PharmMapper; HCC-related targets from GeneCards and OMIM. Overlapping genes were identified by Venn analysis. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using STRING and analyzed with Cytoscape to identify hub genes. Functional enrichment analysis (GO/KEGG) was performed with DAVID. Expression validation and survival analysis used TCGA-LIHC and GEO (GSE39791) data. A prognostic nomogram integrating gene expression and clinical variables was developed. Single-cell RNA sequencing (GSE299340) was analyzed with Seurat to examine hub gene expression. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations investigated DBP interactions with core targets. Results: A total of 242 overlapping genes between DBP-associated and HCC-associated targets were identified. PPI network analysis revealed seven hub genes: KRAS, GRB2, ESR1, HSP90AA1, SRC, EGFR, and TP53. Enrichment analysis indicated significant involvement in cancer-related pathways. Expression analysis in TCGA and GEO datasets confirmed significant dysregulation of GRB2, ESR1, HSP90AA1, and SRC in HCC tissues, which correlated with patient survival outcomes. The prognostic model incorporating these genes showed good predictive accuracy. Single-cell analysis indicated distinct expression patterns of ESR1 (hepatocytes) and HSP90AA1 (immune cells) in HCC. Molecular docking demonstrated stable binding of DBP to ESR1 and HSP90AA1 with favorable binding energies (−6.8 and −6.1 kcal/mol, respectively). Molecular dynamics simulations supported the stability of these complexes, with van der Waals interactions being the primary binding force. Conclusions: This integrative analysis suggests that DBP exposure may contribute to HCC pathogenesis by modulating core genes and pathways, although these findings are associative and require experimental confirmation. Hub genes, especially ESR1 and HSP90AA1, are potential biomarkers and targets. Direct DBP-protein interactions provide mechanistic insights into HCC etiology.

Related

  1. Metabolic-extracellular matrix crosstalk in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanisms and targeted intervention
    Yusufukadier Maimaitinijiati, Tanqing Long, Yuan Meng +6
    Cell Communication and Signaling : CCSPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedCell biologyPMC
  2. Investigating potential molecular mechanisms linking 6PPD-quinone exposure to Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A network toxicology, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation study
    Bin Yang, Xiangjin Wang, Li Zhuo +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyImmunologyPLOSEurope PMC
  3. Molecular Mechanisms of 6PPD and 6PPD-Q Toxicity in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Network Toxicology and Experimental Validation Study
    Ze Li, Yuyang Luo, Siyi Wang +2
    ToxicsPeer-reviewedCC BY15 citedNeurosciencePhysiologyOpenAlex
  4. Repurposing Regulatory Rodent Toxicology Safety Archives to Identify Candidate Hormetic Longevity Agents Highlights Emergent Mitochondrial Mechanisms.
    Satomi Miwa, Olena Kucheryavenko, Kristin Herrmann +7
    Aging cellPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyEurope PMCPMC
  5. Gefitinib-based therapy in refractory hepatocellular carcinoma with EGFR overexpression: a spatial profiling-guided case report
    Qin Xu, Xiaofen Li, Rui Zhu +4
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{dai2026elucidating,
  title = {{Elucidating the toxicogenomic mechanisms of DBP exposure on Hepatocellular carcinoma through network toxicology and molecular docking analysis}},
  author = {Dafei Dai and Nianzhao Yang and Fubao Liu and Xiaopeng Chen},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0359516},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359516},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Elucidating the toxicogenomic mechanisms of DBP exposure on Hepatocellular carcinoma through network toxicology and molecular docking analysis
AU  - Dafei Dai
AU  - Nianzhao Yang
AU  - Fubao Liu
AU  - Xiaopeng Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0359516
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359516
AB  - Backgroud: This study explored the molecular mechanisms by which dibutyl phthalate (DBP) contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) pathogenesis using integrated network toxicology and bioinformatics. Methods: DBP’s carcinogenic potential was evaluated with ADMETLAB 3.0 and ProTox3. DBP-related targets were obtained from ChEMBL, SwissTargetPrediction, and PharmMapper; HCC-related targets from GeneCards and OMIM. Overlapping genes were identified by Venn analysis. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using STRING and analyzed with Cytoscape to identify hub genes. Functional enrichment analysis (GO/KEGG) was performed with DAVID. Expression validation and survival analysis used TCGA-LIHC and GEO (GSE39791) data. A prognostic nomogram integrating gene expression and clinical variables was developed. Single-cell RNA sequencing (GSE299340) was analyzed with Seurat to examine hub gene expression. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations investigated DBP interactions with core targets. Results: A total of 242 overlapping genes between DBP-associated and HCC-associated targets were identified. PPI network analysis revealed seven hub genes: KRAS, GRB2, ESR1, HSP90AA1, SRC, EGFR, and TP53. Enrichment analysis indicated significant involvement in cancer-related pathways. Expression analysis in TCGA and GEO datasets confirmed significant dysregulation of GRB2, ESR1, HSP90AA1, and SRC in HCC tissues, which correlated with patient survival outcomes. The prognostic model incorporating these genes showed good predictive accuracy. Single-cell analysis indicated distinct expression patterns of ESR1 (hepatocytes) and HSP90AA1 (immune cells) in HCC. Molecular docking demonstrated stable binding of DBP to ESR1 and HSP90AA1 with favorable binding energies (−6.8 and −6.1 kcal/mol, respectively). Molecular dynamics simulations supported the stability of these complexes, with van der Waals interactions being the primary binding force. Conclusions: This integrative analysis suggests that DBP exposure may contribute to HCC pathogenesis by modulating core genes and pathways, although these findings are associative and require experimental confirmation. Hub genes, especially ESR1 and HSP90AA1, are potential biomarkers and targets. Direct DBP-protein interactions provide mechanistic insights into HCC etiology.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -