Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Occupational sex segregation is strongly predicted by psychological sex differences

Abstract

If traits of individuals are associated with occupational choice, sex differences in those traits should be associated with sex differences in occupational choice, and consequently, with occupational sex segregation. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the extent to which this is the case for spatial ability, verbal ability, agreeableness, emotional stability, interest in people and interest in things, across 429 occupations. Participants ( N = 2,576, aged 35–45) completed online tests and questionnaires, while students rated occupational requirements. For each occupation, the population sex composition of people with traits in line with requirements was estimated, using trait sex differences and occupational requirement profiles. Estimates were highly predictive of actual population sex ratios, with the model assessing interest and cognition in conjunction explaining the most variance ( R ² = .49), followed by the interest model ( R ² = .46) and the cognition model ( R ² = .18). Among individual traits, sex differences in interest in things were by far the most predictive ( R ² = .42). Notably, sex differences in cognition were more predictive of high proportions of men in occupations than high proportions of women. Given lifespan trait stability, these results suggest that cognition and interests matter in occupational choice, with sex differences consequently contributing substantially to occupational sex segregation.

Related

  1. The Intersection of Psychological Distress, Cardiovascular Health, and Allostatic Load in Occupational Settings: Implications for Preventive Medicine, Occupational Health, and Clinical Management
    Eunice Kwan Chae Park, Woo Hyun Park, Eun-Young Jeon
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Psychological Burden and Mental Health Challenges Associated with Occupational Exposure to Zoonotic Pathogens: A Narrative Review and One Health Perspective
    Carlos Ramiro Silva-Ramos, Saúl Perdomo Cristancho, Yojana Estefany Martínez Hernández +3
    Tropical medicine and infectious diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Differences in physical and mental health outcomes by occupational type among chinese migrant workers in guinea: a cross-sectional survey
    Li Wenzheng, Zhou Xiaojie, Li Anning +2
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Differences in health risk behavior clusters by occupational group among Korean adult workers: a sex-stratified latent class analysis using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2022–2024
    Da-Eun Moon, Yu-Jin Lee, Eun-Mi Baek
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Metabolomic Differences Between Wild and Cultivated Ophiocordyceps sinensis Identify Source-Associated Metabolites with Predicted Antifibrotic Relevance
    Meng-Yuan Jin, Jiayi Li, Jun Lan +4
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{frostegard2026occupational,
  title = {{Occupational sex segregation is strongly predicted by psychological sex differences}},
  author = {Joakim K. E. Frostegård and Björn N. Persson and Kimmo Sorjonen and Kåre Hedebrant and Mikael Lundqvist and Agneta Herlitz},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-75691-x},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-75691-x},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Occupational sex segregation is strongly predicted by psychological sex differences
AU  - Joakim K. E. Frostegård
AU  - Björn N. Persson
AU  - Kimmo Sorjonen
AU  - Kåre Hedebrant
AU  - Mikael Lundqvist
AU  - Agneta Herlitz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-75691-x
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-75691-x
AB  - If traits of individuals are associated with occupational choice, sex differences in those traits should be associated with sex differences in occupational choice, and consequently, with occupational sex segregation. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the extent to which this is the case for spatial ability, verbal ability, agreeableness, emotional stability, interest in people and interest in things, across 429 occupations. Participants ( N = 2,576, aged 35–45) completed online tests and questionnaires, while students rated occupational requirements. For each occupation, the population sex composition of people with traits in line with requirements was estimated, using trait sex differences and occupational requirement profiles. Estimates were highly predictive of actual population sex ratios, with the model assessing interest and cognition in conjunction explaining the most variance ( R ² = .49), followed by the interest model ( R ² = .46) and the cognition model ( R ² = .18). Among individual traits, sex differences in interest in things were by far the most predictive ( R ² = .42). Notably, sex differences in cognition were more predictive of high proportions of men in occupations than high proportions of women. Given lifespan trait stability, these results suggest that cognition and interests matter in occupational choice, with sex differences consequently contributing substantially to occupational sex segregation.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -