Diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound in patients with clinically suspected interstitial lung disease
- 1Chest Diseases Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University
- 2Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University
Abstract
Objective To assess the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in patients with clinically suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD) and its association with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) Warrick scores. Methods This prospective cross sectional study consecutively enrolled patients with clinical features suggestive of ILD. Participants underwent LUS, HRCT, and multidisciplinary clinical assessment. The final ILD diagnosis was established using a comprehensive multidisciplinary clinical reference standard. LUS was considered positive when the total B-line count was > 5. Diagnostic performance of LUS was evaluated against the final diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed the discriminative performance of total B-line count, while Spearman correlation evaluated associations between LUS parameters and HRCT Warrick scores. Results Of 81 patients with suspected ILD, 71 cases were confirmed to have ILD, while the remaining 10 served as a non-ILD comparison group. LUS identified 65 of the 71 confirmed ILD cases and demonstrated 91% sensitivity, 70% specificity, 95% positive predictive value, 53% negative predictive value, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.12. Total B-line count, pleural thickness, and pleural line irregularity were positively correlated with HRCT Warrick scores (ρ = 0.94, 0.69, and 0.57, respectively; all P < .001). Conclusion LUS demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting ILD in patients with clinical suspicion of disease and may serve as an initial adjunctive or triage tool to help identify patients requiring further radiological evaluation with HRCT. However, a negative LUS examination cannot reliably exclude ILD.
Related
- Diagnostic performance of the dengue Ag NS1 rapid test in Peruvian adults with suspected dengue virus infection
- Diagnostic Performance of 99mTc-MAG3 Renal Scintigraphy for Acute Tubular Necrosis and Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Suspected Graft Dysfunction During the First 90 Days: A Single-Center, Biopsy-Referenced Retrospective Study
- Thoracic ultrasound finding interstitial lung disease in SLE: a diagnostic test accuracy study.
- Diagnostic Performance of Color Doppler Ultrasound for Detecting Nuchal Cord and Associated Immediate Neonatal Outcomes at Term in Uganda: A Prospective Diagnostic‐Accuracy Cohort Study
- Quantitative D-Dimer in Suspected Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Diagnostic Performance and Clinical–Radiological Associations
BibTeX
@article{bayoumi2026diagnostic,
title = {{Diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound in patients with clinically suspected interstitial lung disease}},
author = {Aml Ibrahim Bayoumi and Rana Kamal El Said and Khaled Kamel and Nourhan Mohamed Ewis and Jumana Hesham Ismail},
journal = {The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s43168-026-00703-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-026-00703-3},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound in patients with clinically suspected interstitial lung disease
AU - Aml Ibrahim Bayoumi
AU - Rana Kamal El Said
AU - Khaled Kamel
AU - Nourhan Mohamed Ewis
AU - Jumana Hesham Ismail
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
DO - 10.1186/s43168-026-00703-3
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-026-00703-3
AB - Objective To assess the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in patients with clinically suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD) and its association with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) Warrick scores. Methods This prospective cross sectional study consecutively enrolled patients with clinical features suggestive of ILD. Participants underwent LUS, HRCT, and multidisciplinary clinical assessment. The final ILD diagnosis was established using a comprehensive multidisciplinary clinical reference standard. LUS was considered positive when the total B-line count was > 5. Diagnostic performance of LUS was evaluated against the final diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed the discriminative performance of total B-line count, while Spearman correlation evaluated associations between LUS parameters and HRCT Warrick scores. Results Of 81 patients with suspected ILD, 71 cases were confirmed to have ILD, while the remaining 10 served as a non-ILD comparison group. LUS identified 65 of the 71 confirmed ILD cases and demonstrated 91% sensitivity, 70% specificity, 95% positive predictive value, 53% negative predictive value, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.12. Total B-line count, pleural thickness, and pleural line irregularity were positively correlated with HRCT Warrick scores (ρ = 0.94, 0.69, and 0.57, respectively; all P < .001). Conclusion LUS demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting ILD in patients with clinical suspicion of disease and may serve as an initial adjunctive or triage tool to help identify patients requiring further radiological evaluation with HRCT. However, a negative LUS examination cannot reliably exclude ILD.
SN - 1687-8426
SN - 2314-8551
ER -