The TSST goes virtual: conceptual development, current evidence and future directions.
- 1Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, University of Trier, Germany.
- 2Institute for Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, University of Trier, Germany.
- 3Department of Engineering Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
Abstract
The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) has become a foundational paradigm in experimental stress research, shaping the study of acute psychosocial stress for more than three decades. Over the past two decades, efforts to translate the TSST into immersive virtual reality (VR) environments have opened new avenues for stress research while also raising important methodological and conceptual questions. In this narrative review, we summarize the development of VR-based versions of the TSST, highlight their applications across psychoneuroendocrinology and related disciplines, and evaluate empirical evidence comparing VR adaptations with the original in-person paradigm. Across studies, TSST-VR paradigms reliably elicit subjective stress responses and often autonomic activation, whereas endocrine responses, particularly cortisol reactivity, are frequently attenuated and less robust than in the traditional TSST. We therefore discuss key challenges of virtual implementation, including reduced stress-control specificity, variability in presence and immersion, and potential confounds related to the VR context itself, such as novelty and cybersickness. At the same time, VR offers important advantages, including greater standardization, experimental control, efficiency, scalability, and compatibility with multimodal assessment. Finally, we outline future directions for VR-based stress research, including interactive and AI-driven evaluators, hybrid and lower-threshold formats, multimodal integration, and augmented or mixed-reality paradigms. We argue that TSST virtualization is best understood as an extension of the original paradigm's logic, expanding the methodological repertoire of experimental stress research while preserving its core focus on social-evaluative threat and uncontrollability.
Related
- Parasite-associated microbiomes in Ascaris and Trichuris nematodes: current evidence, challenges, and future directions
- Adjunctive Corticosteroids in Pediatric Meningitis: Current Evidence, Clinical Controversies, and Future Directions.
- Cattle production, water resources, and sustainability: a review of current knowledge and future directions.
- Biomaterials in the management of cleft lip and palate: current applications and future directions
- Engineering the plant holobiont for enhanced abiotic stress resilience: current insights and future directions
BibTeX
@article{dawans2026tsst,
title = {{The TSST goes virtual: conceptual development, current evidence and future directions.}},
author = {Bernadette von Dawans and Daniel Zielasko and Gregor Domes},
journal = {Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.cpnec.2026.100383},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42920966},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The TSST goes virtual: conceptual development, current evidence and future directions.
AU - Bernadette von Dawans
AU - Daniel Zielasko
AU - Gregor Domes
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/25
JO - Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology
DO - 10.1016/j.cpnec.2026.100383
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42920966
AB - The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) has become a foundational paradigm in experimental stress research, shaping the study of acute psychosocial stress for more than three decades. Over the past two decades, efforts to translate the TSST into immersive virtual reality (VR) environments have opened new avenues for stress research while also raising important methodological and conceptual questions. In this narrative review, we summarize the development of VR-based versions of the TSST, highlight their applications across psychoneuroendocrinology and related disciplines, and evaluate empirical evidence comparing VR adaptations with the original in-person paradigm. Across studies, TSST-VR paradigms reliably elicit subjective stress responses and often autonomic activation, whereas endocrine responses, particularly cortisol reactivity, are frequently attenuated and less robust than in the traditional TSST. We therefore discuss key challenges of virtual implementation, including reduced stress-control specificity, variability in presence and immersion, and potential confounds related to the VR context itself, such as novelty and cybersickness. At the same time, VR offers important advantages, including greater standardization, experimental control, efficiency, scalability, and compatibility with multimodal assessment. Finally, we outline future directions for VR-based stress research, including interactive and AI-driven evaluators, hybrid and lower-threshold formats, multimodal integration, and augmented or mixed-reality paradigms. We argue that TSST virtualization is best understood as an extension of the original paradigm's logic, expanding the methodological repertoire of experimental stress research while preserving its core focus on social-evaluative threat and uncontrollability.
SN - 2666-4976
ER -