Prophylactic Low-Dose Esketamine for Prevention of Intraoperative Penile Erection During Ureteroscopic Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
- 2Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of People's Liberation Army, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
- 3Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Base of Central Theater Command of People's Liberation Army, School of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
- 4Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Base of Central Theater Command of People's Liberation Army, Hubei University of Medicine, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
Purpose
Intraoperative penile erection (IPE) during ureteroscopic surgery may interrupt surgical procedures and increase the risk of urethral injury. Existing management strategies are largely reactive and frequently require rescue interventions after erection has already developed. Effective prophylactic strategies remain limited. We evaluated whether prophylactic esketamine reduces the incidence of intraoperative penile erection during ureteroscopic surgery under general anesthesia.Patients and methods
This single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500114505) enrolled 356 adult men (ASA I-II) scheduled for elective ureteroscopic surgery. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous esketamine 0.3 mg/kg or saline before anesthetic induction; allocation was concealed, and patients, anesthetists, surgeons, and outcome assessors were blinded. The primary outcome was the incidence of IPE (Porst grade ≥1), assessed at nine predefined intraoperative time points (T0-T8), with rescue treatment for erections of grade ≥2. Secondary outcomes included erection severity, hemodynamic variables, recovery characteristics, and adverse events.Results
The incidence of IPE was 6.2% (11/178) with esketamine versus 21.9% (39/178) with saline (RR 0.282, 95% CI 0.149-0.533; ARR 15.7%; NNT 6.4; P < 0.001). Porst grades were lower in the esketamine group during disinfection, ureteroscope insertion, and 10 min after surgery commenced, and fewer patients required rescue treatment for clinically significant erection (Porst grade ≥ 2, 4.5% vs 21.3%; P < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure was higher with esketamine intraoperatively (adjusted mean difference 3.49 mmHg), and heart rate was higher, without clinically significant hemodynamic disturbance. Recovery and adverse events did not differ significantly between groups, no hallucinations occurred; postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort was less severe with esketamine (P < 0.001).Conclusion
Prophylactic low-dose esketamine was associated with a lower incidence and severity of intraoperative penile erection, without evidence of impaired postoperative recovery. These findings suggest that prophylactic esketamine may be a useful strategy for preventing this perioperative complication, warranting confirmation in larger multicenter trials.
Related
- Current evidence of flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy under local anesthesia: feasibility, safety, and clinical application.
- Dual benefit of esketamine-based opioid-free anesthesia on postoperative pain and mental health outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
- Intraoperative hemodynamic changes in patients receiving dexmedetomidine for general anesthesia.
- Effect of Intraoperative Subanesthetic-Dose Esketamine on Postoperative Hydromorphone Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
- Cumulative Intraoperative Hypotension Burden as a Predictor of Early Quality of Recovery Following General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026prophylactic,
title = {{Prophylactic Low-Dose Esketamine for Prevention of Intraoperative Penile Erection During Ureteroscopic Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.}},
author = {Zijie Zhang and Guojiang Yin and Wanting He and Xiaoyu Zhang and Yingying Wei and Xiaoyu Liang and Zongze Zhang and Xiang Zhou},
journal = {Drug design, development and therapy},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2147/dddt.s631265},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928869},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Prophylactic Low-Dose Esketamine for Prevention of Intraoperative Penile Erection During Ureteroscopic Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
AU - Zijie Zhang
AU - Guojiang Yin
AU - Wanting He
AU - Xiaoyu Zhang
AU - Yingying Wei
AU - Xiaoyu Liang
AU - Zongze Zhang
AU - Xiang Zhou
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Drug design, development and therapy
DO - 10.2147/dddt.s631265
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928869
AB - Purpose Intraoperative penile erection (IPE) during ureteroscopic surgery may interrupt surgical procedures and increase the risk of urethral injury. Existing management strategies are largely reactive and frequently require rescue interventions after erection has already developed. Effective prophylactic strategies remain limited. We evaluated whether prophylactic esketamine reduces the incidence of intraoperative penile erection during ureteroscopic surgery under general anesthesia.Patients and methods This single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500114505) enrolled 356 adult men (ASA I-II) scheduled for elective ureteroscopic surgery. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous esketamine 0.3 mg/kg or saline before anesthetic induction; allocation was concealed, and patients, anesthetists, surgeons, and outcome assessors were blinded. The primary outcome was the incidence of IPE (Porst grade ≥1), assessed at nine predefined intraoperative time points (T0-T8), with rescue treatment for erections of grade ≥2. Secondary outcomes included erection severity, hemodynamic variables, recovery characteristics, and adverse events.Results The incidence of IPE was 6.2% (11/178) with esketamine versus 21.9% (39/178) with saline (RR 0.282, 95% CI 0.149-0.533; ARR 15.7%; NNT 6.4; P < 0.001). Porst grades were lower in the esketamine group during disinfection, ureteroscope insertion, and 10 min after surgery commenced, and fewer patients required rescue treatment for clinically significant erection (Porst grade ≥ 2, 4.5% vs 21.3%; P < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure was higher with esketamine intraoperatively (adjusted mean difference 3.49 mmHg), and heart rate was higher, without clinically significant hemodynamic disturbance. Recovery and adverse events did not differ significantly between groups, no hallucinations occurred; postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort was less severe with esketamine (P < 0.001).Conclusion Prophylactic low-dose esketamine was associated with a lower incidence and severity of intraoperative penile erection, without evidence of impaired postoperative recovery. These findings suggest that prophylactic esketamine may be a useful strategy for preventing this perioperative complication, warranting confirmation in larger multicenter trials.
SN - 1177-8881
ER -