Quantitatively Probing the Tilt Angle Failures in 4D-STEM Polarisation Analysis
Abstract
Four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM) is increasingly used to map polarisation in ferroic textures such as domain walls, vortices, merons and skyrmions. These textures are accompanied by local strain, lattice rotation and misorientation, which also modulate the diffraction features used to infer polar order. Even small deviations from the zone axis can therefore produce contrast that is indistinguishable from a polarisation signal. Here we quantify the tilt sensitivity of two polarisation-sensitive signals, diffraction disc intensity and Kikuchi band intensity, in three ferroelectrics with distinct polar distortions: PbTiO3, BaTiO3 and Cu3B7O13Cl boracite. We find that tilts of only 0.01-0.05 degrees reverse most Friedel-pair disc asymmetries, and even the most robust disc pairs reverse by 0.04 degrees in BaTiO3, 0.14 degrees in PbTiO3 and 0.18 degrees in boracite, producing contrast equal and opposite to that of the polarisation. Kikuchi band contrast is the only signal that reports absolute polarity without knowledge of the specimen thickness, but it does so only up to 0.09 degrees in PbTiO3, 0.015 degrees in BaTiO3 and 0.02 degrees in boracite. From these results we define tilt tolerances for each signal and material, and propose practical criteria for distinguishing polarisation contrast from misorientation. The analysis also applies to scanning electron microscopy-based diffraction, including electron backscatter diffraction.
Related
- Probing quantum Hall edge chirality and the anyonic exchange angle with a three-path interferometer
- Probing the formation of femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on silica films by ultrafast small-angle X-ray scattering
- Bath-modes quantitatively capture the nonlinear microrheology of micellar solutions
- Integrated Circular Polarisation Beam Shaper Based on Tilted Waveguide Bragg Gratings
- Cavity-assisted dynamic nuclear polarisation
BibTeX
@misc{hardy2026quantitatively,
title = {{Quantitatively Probing the Tilt Angle Failures in 4D-STEM Polarisation Analysis}},
author = {Fintan G. Hardy and Noah Schnitzer and Mariana Palos and Geri Topore and Aron Walsh and Michele Shelly Conroy},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.06274},
eprint = {2611.06274},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06274},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Quantitatively Probing the Tilt Angle Failures in 4D-STEM Polarisation Analysis
AU - Fintan G. Hardy
AU - Noah Schnitzer
AU - Mariana Palos
AU - Geri Topore
AU - Aron Walsh
AU - Michele Shelly Conroy
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.06274
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06274
AB - Four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM) is increasingly used to map polarisation in ferroic textures such as domain walls, vortices, merons and skyrmions. These textures are accompanied by local strain, lattice rotation and misorientation, which also modulate the diffraction features used to infer polar order. Even small deviations from the zone axis can therefore produce contrast that is indistinguishable from a polarisation signal. Here we quantify the tilt sensitivity of two polarisation-sensitive signals, diffraction disc intensity and Kikuchi band intensity, in three ferroelectrics with distinct polar distortions: PbTiO3, BaTiO3 and Cu3B7O13Cl boracite. We find that tilts of only 0.01-0.05 degrees reverse most Friedel-pair disc asymmetries, and even the most robust disc pairs reverse by 0.04 degrees in BaTiO3, 0.14 degrees in PbTiO3 and 0.18 degrees in boracite, producing contrast equal and opposite to that of the polarisation. Kikuchi band contrast is the only signal that reports absolute polarity without knowledge of the specimen thickness, but it does so only up to 0.09 degrees in PbTiO3, 0.015 degrees in BaTiO3 and 0.02 degrees in boracite. From these results we define tilt tolerances for each signal and material, and propose practical criteria for distinguishing polarisation contrast from misorientation. The analysis also applies to scanning electron microscopy-based diffraction, including electron backscatter diffraction.
ER -