Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0EarthArXiv

Evaluations of Climate-Informed Early Warning Systems for Foodborne, Waterborne, and Vector-Borne Diseases: A Scoping Review

Abstract

Climate change is altering infectious disease risk over time and across geographies. These changing risks can negatively impact human health and pose challenges to health systems. Anticipating outbreaks before they happen and implementing adaptive measures can help reduce the burden of climate-sensitive infectious diseases. Climate-informed early warning systems (CIEWS) are integrated systems of climate and infectious disease risk monitoring, forecasting, and prediction that inform communication and preparedness efforts for timely action to reduce disease risk in advance of hazardous events. CIEWS can provide critical information for public health systems to adapt to the changing risk of infectious diseases. While extensive research has advanced predictive models for potential use in CIEWS, evidence of the effectiveness of these tools once operationalized has not been well described. In this scoping review, we examine the evidence base evaluating operational CIEWS targeting foodborne, waterborne, and vector-borne diseases. We conducted a search in Global Index Medicus, Scopus, and PubMed. Of the 9,917 unique articles screened, 21 met eligibility criteria. Included articles described 17 unique CIEWS and spanned five WHO regions (the Americas, Western Pacific, Africa, South-East Asia, and Eastern Mediterranean). All but one article presented a CIEWS for a vector-borne disease, with dengue most prominently represented. Most evaluations of CIEWS focused on statistical performance of the model, with only two evaluations of CIEWS effectiveness, and four evaluations of the system’s operational features. There are significant evidence gaps and a need for more research to demonstrate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of operational CIEWS, particularly for foodborne and waterborne diseases. Evaluations of CIEWS are critical for ensuring systems are useful, usable, and effectively informing anticipatory action for climate-sensitive infectious diseases.

Related

  1. Whole-genome sequencing-driven source tracing of foodborne diseases: from cgMLST/SNP typing toward an integrated framework of pan-genomics and machine learning
    Yong Song, Chi Zhang, Jing-jing Li +5
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  2. Climate variability and the emerging risks of foodborne pathogens: consequences for food safety and population health.
    Desalegn Amenu, Waktole Gobena, Reda Nemo
    One health outlookPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Trauma-Informed Climate Scale-10 in Healthcare Settings
    Tuğba Yılmaz, Yusuf Ziya Koç, Eda Şen +1
    Psikiyatride Güncel YaklaşımlarPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthDOAJ
  4. Framework-informed analysis of practice: A qualitative study on climate resilience in primary care in Austria
    Johanna Schauer-Berg, Andrea Stitzel, Willi Haas +2
    The Journal of Climate Change and HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyDOAJPMC
  5. K.3. Round Table: Infectious diseases surveillance and control under the changing climate
    European Climate and Health Observatory, European Environment Agency, Emanuele Massaro
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{rao2026evaluations,
  title = {{Evaluations of Climate-Informed Early Warning Systems for Foodborne, Waterborne, and Vector-Borne Diseases: A Scoping Review}},
  author = {Maya M. Rao and Katherine R. O’Brien and Afrin Iqbal and Sarah E. Dumas and Timothy H. Holtz},
  howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.31223/x5bb9c},
  url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15013/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Evaluations of Climate-Informed Early Warning Systems for Foodborne, Waterborne, and Vector-Borne Diseases: A Scoping Review
AU  - Maya M. Rao
AU  - Katherine R. O’Brien
AU  - Afrin Iqbal
AU  - Sarah E. Dumas
AU  - Timothy H. Holtz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - EarthArXiv
DO  - 10.31223/x5bb9c
UR  - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15013/
AB  - Climate change is altering infectious disease risk over time and across geographies. These changing risks can negatively impact human health and pose challenges to health systems. Anticipating outbreaks before they happen and implementing adaptive measures can help reduce the burden of climate-sensitive infectious diseases. Climate-informed early warning systems (CIEWS) are integrated systems of climate and infectious disease risk monitoring, forecasting, and prediction that inform communication and preparedness efforts for timely action to reduce disease risk in advance of hazardous events. CIEWS can provide critical information for public health systems to adapt to the changing risk of infectious diseases. While extensive research has advanced predictive models for potential use in CIEWS, evidence of the effectiveness of these tools once operationalized has not been well described. In this scoping review, we examine the evidence base evaluating operational CIEWS targeting foodborne, waterborne, and vector-borne diseases. We conducted a search in Global Index Medicus, Scopus, and PubMed. Of the 9,917 unique articles screened, 21 met eligibility criteria. Included articles described 17 unique CIEWS and spanned five WHO regions (the Americas, Western Pacific, Africa, South-East Asia, and Eastern Mediterranean). All but one article presented a CIEWS for a vector-borne disease, with dengue most prominently represented. Most evaluations of CIEWS focused on statistical performance of the model, with only two evaluations of CIEWS effectiveness, and four evaluations of the system’s operational features. There are significant evidence gaps and a need for more research to demonstrate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of operational CIEWS, particularly for foodborne and waterborne diseases. Evaluations of CIEWS are critical for ensuring systems are useful, usable, and effectively informing anticipatory action for climate-sensitive infectious diseases.
ER  -