Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Modelled Response Times for Police and Fire Brigade Co-Dispatch to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Geospatial Simulation Study in Vorarlberg, Austria

  1. 1Clinical Division of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800 Vorarlberg, Austria
  2. 2Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  3. 3Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, 1090 Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depends on the interval between collapse and the start of chest compressions. We estimated how co-dispatching police and volunteer fire brigades alongside emergency medical services (EMS) would change the modelled time from dispatch to arrival of the first unit in Vorarlberg, Austria. Methods: In a geospatial simulation, 500 OHCA locations were drawn from a 100 m population raster, weighted by residential population. Driving times from all 18 EMS, 28 police and 121 volunteer fire stations were routed on the road network, and turnout times of 2 min (EMS), 0 min (police) and 5 min (fire brigade) were added; all units were modelled as continuously available at fixed stations. Four configurations (EMS alone, EMS plus police, EMS plus fire brigade, triple dispatch) were compared by paired time gains and 10 min coverage with bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs); uncertainty from sampling, turnout times, unit availability and routing was assessed separately. Results: Of 500 missions, 499 were analysable. Median response time was 9.81 min with EMS alone, 5.45 min with EMS plus police, 7.36 min with EMS plus fire brigade and 5.41 min with triple dispatch; the paired median time gain of triple dispatch over EMS alone was 4.34 min (95% CI 3.80–4.67). Locations reached within 10 min rose from 51.1% to 87.4%, 87.0% and 94.6%, and the resident population inside the 10 min isochrones rose from 55.6% to 90.9%, 91.9% and 95.5%. Conclusions: Under fixed station locations, continuous unit availability and assumed agency-specific turnout times, police and fire brigade co-dispatch increased modelled ten-minute coverage compared with EMS alone. Police arrived earlier at most locations, whereas the denser fire station network contributed most in rural areas; their combination reached the most locations. Operational validation is required before these estimates can inform regional implementation.

Related

  1. Addressing Measurement Error of Machine-Learned Physical Activity in Nonlinear Dose-Response Survival Analysis: Development and Evaluation of Accelerated Failure Time, Spline, and Simulation-Extrapolation Method
    H. Mamiya, Q. Zhang, X. Zhang +2
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Modelled mortality benefits of reducing fibrinolysis resistance in sepsis: integrating observational and ex vivo data
    L. Coupland, M. Self, E. Suryana +8
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  3. Decoding suicidal crises in the emergency medical dispatch setting: protocol for a nationwide Swedish mixed-methods study
    Johanna Tjernberg, Oscar Kjell, Fredrik Byrsell +3
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Back trajectory modelled PM10 plumes: population vulnerability profile from an uncontrolled fire
    SD Griffiths, ME Deary
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMCEurope PMC
  5. Meteorological forecasting of respiratory diseases incidence with geospatial and machine learning methods
    Benjamín Arroquia-Cuadros, Ángel Marqués-Mateu, Pablo Fdez-Arroyabe +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{schmid2026modelled,
  title = {{Modelled Response Times for Police and Fire Brigade Co-Dispatch to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Geospatial Simulation Study in Vorarlberg, Austria}},
  author = {Andreas Schmid and Harald Rinösl and Manuel Winkler and Maximilian Scheidl and Oliver Kimberger and Mathias Maleczek},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218237},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8237},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Modelled Response Times for Police and Fire Brigade Co-Dispatch to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Geospatial Simulation Study in Vorarlberg, Austria
AU  - Andreas Schmid
AU  - Harald Rinösl
AU  - Manuel Winkler
AU  - Maximilian Scheidl
AU  - Oliver Kimberger
AU  - Mathias Maleczek
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218237
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8237
AB  - Background/Objectives: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depends on the interval between collapse and the start of chest compressions. We estimated how co-dispatching police and volunteer fire brigades alongside emergency medical services (EMS) would change the modelled time from dispatch to arrival of the first unit in Vorarlberg, Austria. Methods: In a geospatial simulation, 500 OHCA locations were drawn from a 100 m population raster, weighted by residential population. Driving times from all 18 EMS, 28 police and 121 volunteer fire stations were routed on the road network, and turnout times of 2 min (EMS), 0 min (police) and 5 min (fire brigade) were added; all units were modelled as continuously available at fixed stations. Four configurations (EMS alone, EMS plus police, EMS plus fire brigade, triple dispatch) were compared by paired time gains and 10 min coverage with bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs); uncertainty from sampling, turnout times, unit availability and routing was assessed separately. Results: Of 500 missions, 499 were analysable. Median response time was 9.81 min with EMS alone, 5.45 min with EMS plus police, 7.36 min with EMS plus fire brigade and 5.41 min with triple dispatch; the paired median time gain of triple dispatch over EMS alone was 4.34 min (95% CI 3.80–4.67). Locations reached within 10 min rose from 51.1% to 87.4%, 87.0% and 94.6%, and the resident population inside the 10 min isochrones rose from 55.6% to 90.9%, 91.9% and 95.5%. Conclusions: Under fixed station locations, continuous unit availability and assumed agency-specific turnout times, police and fire brigade co-dispatch increased modelled ten-minute coverage compared with EMS alone. Police arrived earlier at most locations, whereas the denser fire station network contributed most in rural areas; their combination reached the most locations. Operational validation is required before these estimates can inform regional implementation.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -