Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCMedicine

Impact of a zero-visitation policy on healthcare-associated infections in a non-COVID intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkiye.
  2. 2Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkiye.
  3. 3Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkiye.
  4. 4Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkiye.

Abstract

The impact of visitor restrictions in intensive care units (ICUs) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare HAI rates between the pre-pandemic restricted-visitation period and the pandemic zero-visitation period in a non-COVID tertiary ICU. This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to the Anesthesiology and Reanimation ICU of the Duzce University Health Practice and Research Center between March 14, 2019, and March 13, 2021. Patients admitted during the pre-pandemic restricted-visitation period were assigned to Group 19 -20, whereas those admitted during the pandemic zero-visitation period were assigned to Group 20-21. Patients with an ICU stay of < 48 hours, infection at admission, or infection developing within the first 48 hours were excluded. The primary outcome was HAI incidence. Secondary outcomes included the standardized infection ratio, cumulative attributable difference, inflammatory markers, and microbiological findings. A total of 933 patients were screened, and 206 patients met the inclusion criteria (Group 20-21, n = 115; Group 19-20, n = 91). In the patient-based analysis, the HAI rate was significantly lower in Group 20-21 than in Group 19-20 (6.1% vs 22.0%, P < .001). Similar findings were observed in the episode-based analysis (10.4% vs 33.0%, P < .001). The time to infection onset was significantly longer in Group 20-21 (P = .003). Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and lactate levels were significantly lower during the zero-visitation period. The standardized infection ratio for ventilator-associated pneumonia was significantly lower in Group 20-21 (P = .02). A marked reduction in the number of Acinetobacter spp. isolates was also observed during the pandemic. A zero-visitation policy in a non-COVID tertiary ICU was associated with lower HAI rates. The consistency of the surveillance indicators, inflammatory markers, and microbiological findings supports the observed association. However, these findings should not be attributed solely to visitor restrictions and should be interpreted in the context of multiple infection control measures implemented during the pandemic.

Related

  1. Epidemiology, microbiological characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance of device-associated healthcare-associated infections in a neonatal intensive care unit: a six-year surveillance study
    Haiqiao Zhang, Mingyan Zou, Xiaoming Guo +2
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  2. Registered trials for healthcare-associated infections prevention in intensive care units, 2000-2025
    L M Siena, G Migliara, A Sciurti +7
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCEurope PMC
  3. Development and content validation of a risk-stratified nursing intervention programme for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections
    Luís Filipe Pereira Todo Bom, Maria dos Anjos Coelho Rodrigues Dixe, Maria do Céu Marquês
    Journal of Infection PreventionPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textInfectious diseasePMC
  4. Prevalence, Etiology, and Clinical Outcomes of Healthcare-Associated Infections in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital.
    Shahnaz Armin, Rahele Razmara, Sepideh Mirzayi +2
    GMS hygiene and infection controlPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Malignancy: Microbiological Epidemiology, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Factors Associated with Mortality in a Nine-Year Single-Center Retrospective Cohort
    Cihan Yeşil, Cemile Arslan Yeşil, Ferhat Yılmaz +2
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{karka2026impact,
  title = {{Impact of a zero-visitation policy on healthcare-associated infections in a non-COVID intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study.}},
  author = {Ozlem Ersoy Karka and Ozlem Ersoy Karka and Dilek Akinci and Mehmet Ali Sungur and Bilge Baytar and Emel Caliskan and Ilknur Suidiye Yorulmaz and Gizem Demir Senoglu and Gulbin Sezen and Yavuz Demiraran},
  journal = {Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1097/md.0000000000051102},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42888540},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of a zero-visitation policy on healthcare-associated infections in a non-COVID intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study.
AU  - Ozlem Ersoy Karka
AU  - Ozlem Ersoy Karka
AU  - Dilek Akinci
AU  - Mehmet Ali Sungur
AU  - Bilge Baytar
AU  - Emel Caliskan
AU  - Ilknur Suidiye Yorulmaz
AU  - Gizem Demir Senoglu
AU  - Gulbin Sezen
AU  - Yavuz Demiraran
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Medicine
DO  - 10.1097/md.0000000000051102
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42888540
AB  - The impact of visitor restrictions in intensive care units (ICUs) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare HAI rates between the pre-pandemic restricted-visitation period and the pandemic zero-visitation period in a non-COVID tertiary ICU. This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to the Anesthesiology and Reanimation ICU of the Duzce University Health Practice and Research Center between March 14, 2019, and March 13, 2021. Patients admitted during the pre-pandemic restricted-visitation period were assigned to Group 19 -20, whereas those admitted during the pandemic zero-visitation period were assigned to Group 20-21. Patients with an ICU stay of < 48 hours, infection at admission, or infection developing within the first 48 hours were excluded. The primary outcome was HAI incidence. Secondary outcomes included the standardized infection ratio, cumulative attributable difference, inflammatory markers, and microbiological findings. A total of 933 patients were screened, and 206 patients met the inclusion criteria (Group 20-21, n = 115; Group 19-20, n = 91). In the patient-based analysis, the HAI rate was significantly lower in Group 20-21 than in Group 19-20 (6.1% vs 22.0%, P < .001). Similar findings were observed in the episode-based analysis (10.4% vs 33.0%, P < .001). The time to infection onset was significantly longer in Group 20-21 (P = .003). Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and lactate levels were significantly lower during the zero-visitation period. The standardized infection ratio for ventilator-associated pneumonia was significantly lower in Group 20-21 (P = .02). A marked reduction in the number of Acinetobacter spp. isolates was also observed during the pandemic. A zero-visitation policy in a non-COVID tertiary ICU was associated with lower HAI rates. The consistency of the surveillance indicators, inflammatory markers, and microbiological findings supports the observed association. However, these findings should not be attributed solely to visitor restrictions and should be interpreted in the context of multiple infection control measures implemented during the pandemic.
SN  - 0304-5412
SN  - 1536-5964
ER  -