Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Royal Society Open Science

Calibrated term presence modelling for CCUS patent abstracts: a case study with variational autoencoders and retrieval baselines

  1. 1Mathematics-Driven Innovation Centre and The Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University 1 , Edinburgh, UK
  2. 2School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences and The Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Duncan Laboratory for Insurance Data Science, Heriot-Watt University 2 , Edinburgh, UK
  3. 3Edinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University 3 , Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Patent codes may lack granularity when carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) inventions combine climate and chemical engineering concepts. We evaluate term presence models on 10 603 English patent abstracts through document completion, calibration and cooperative patent classification (CPC) prefix retrieval. We compare two variational autoencoders (VAEs), a product of the experts latent Dirichlet allocation model, a unigram prior, term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), PatentSBERTa and PaECTER. With a target masking rate of 50 per cent for positive terms, TF-IDF nearest neighbours give the best ranked completion. The direct Bernoulli VAE ranks slightly above the negative binomial to Bernoulli VAE (NB VAE), while the latter has lower expected calibration error (ECE). Conditional posterior predictive draws retain positive rank associations for document and term counts, but the NB VAE and direct Bernoulli VAE predict 1.47 and 1.63 times the observed positive count, respectively. PaECTER and the TF-IDF representation after singular value decomposition (SVD) give the strongest CPC prefix retrieval, while VAE probabilities could support inspectable term screening.

Related

  1. Variational Autoencoders for Medical Image Segmentation: A Review
    Journal of imagingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  2. Meta-Variational Autoencoders: A Framework for Learning to Construct, Adapt, and Optimize Variational Autoencoders
    Jincheng Zhang
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  3. PAC-Bayesian Reconstruction Guarantees for Time Series Variational Autoencoders
    Chloé Hashimoto-Cullen, Ghislain Agoua, Benjamin Guedj +1
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsHALarXiv
  4. Elucidating structure-property correlations in ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films using variational autoencoders
    Kévin Alhada-Lahbabi, Brice Gautier, Damien Deleruyelle +1
    Materials & DesignPeer-reviewedCC BY3 citedGeneral physicsHAL
  5. Enhanced Uncertainty Quantification Variational Autoencoders for the Solution of Bayesian Inverse Problems
    Andrea Tonini, Luca Dede’
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{matsantonis2026calibrated,
  title = {{Calibrated term presence modelling for CCUS patent abstracts: a case study with variational autoencoders and retrieval baselines}},
  author = {Charalampos Matsantonis and George Tzougas and Dimitris Christopoulos and David Dekker and George Streftaris},
  journal = {Royal Society Open Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1098/rsos.261365},
  url = {https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/10/261365/483955/Calibrated-term-presence-modelling-for-CCUS-patent},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Calibrated term presence modelling for CCUS patent abstracts: a case study with variational autoencoders and retrieval baselines
AU  - Charalampos Matsantonis
AU  - George Tzougas
AU  - Dimitris Christopoulos
AU  - David Dekker
AU  - George Streftaris
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Royal Society Open Science
DO  - 10.1098/rsos.261365
UR  - https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/10/261365/483955/Calibrated-term-presence-modelling-for-CCUS-patent
AB  - Patent codes may lack granularity when carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) inventions combine climate and chemical engineering concepts. We evaluate term presence models on 10 603 English patent abstracts through document completion, calibration and cooperative patent classification (CPC) prefix retrieval. We compare two variational autoencoders (VAEs), a product of the experts latent Dirichlet allocation model, a unigram prior, term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), PatentSBERTa and PaECTER. With a target masking rate of 50 per cent for positive terms, TF-IDF nearest neighbours give the best ranked completion. The direct Bernoulli VAE ranks slightly above the negative binomial to Bernoulli VAE (NB VAE), while the latter has lower expected calibration error (ECE). Conditional posterior predictive draws retain positive rank associations for document and term counts, but the NB VAE and direct Bernoulli VAE predict 1.47 and 1.63 times the observed positive count, respectively. PaECTER and the TF-IDF representation after singular value decomposition (SVD) give the strongest CPC prefix retrieval, while VAE probabilities could support inspectable term screening.
SN  - 2054-5703
ER  -