Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYScientific Reports

Association and discriminatory performance of body roundness index for dysglycemia among adults in Ethiopia

  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, Bahir Dar University
  2. 2Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Bahir Dar University
  3. 3Department of Adult Nursing, Bahir Dar University

Abstract

Body roundness index is a novel anthropometric measure of body fat based on height and waist circumference, but its association with dysglycemia remains understudied. We aimed to assess the association and discriminatory performance of between body roundness index and dysglycemia among adult patients at outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to assess the association. A total of 427 adults aged ≥ 35 years were included in this study. The mean body roundness index of the study population was 4.22 ± 1.12. BRI was significantly associated with higher odds of dysglycemia. A graded increase in risk was observed across BRI quartiles, with participants in the highest quartile (Q4) showing markedly increased odds compared with Q1 (AOR: 16.6; 95% CI: 7.09–39.14). Similar associations were observed for prediabetes (Q4 vs. Q1: AOR: 11.39; 95% CI: 3.73–34.76) and type 2 diabetes (Q4 vs. Q1: AOR: 29.2; 95% CI: 9.84–86.59). A receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that it had good discriminatory ability for dysglycemia (AUC 0.813, 95% CI: 0.772–0.854). When compared with other anthropometric indices, BRI demonstrated a comparable AUC to BMI (0.810; 95% CI: 0.769–0.850) and waist circumference (0.833; 95% CI: 0.796–0.871). The optimal body roundness index cutoff was 4.17 (sensitivity 73.6%, specificity 79.2%), with sex-specific cutoffs of 4.02 for males and 4.17 for females. Body roundness index showed a strong, graded association with dysglycemia.

Related

  1. Validation of the discriminatory performance of the iPREFACE score for clinically significant fetal acidemia: an outcome-enriched nested case–control study
    Ayumu Ito, Mio Kamiya, Eijiro Hayata +2
    AJOG global reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Evaluation and performance of the β-hCG discriminatory zone and targeted ultrasound findings for early pregnancy diagnosis in a high-risk population: a retrospective cohort study at a US safety-net hospital.
    Panagiotis Cherouveim, Shagun Tuli, Esra Cetin +7
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. The association of triglyceride-glucose body roundness index with carotid atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study
    Cuihua Huang, Yan Tong, Yan Luo +1
    Frontiers in endocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Clinical significance and discriminatory performance of the serum KL-6 level as a biomarker for severe Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in children
    Lei Ding, Sufang Chen, Huafeng Song +6
    Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  5. Associations and Discriminatory Performance of Anthropometric and Body-Shape Indices for Identifying Hypertension in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in Malawi: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Alexander Thomas Mboma, Saulos Kondwani Nyirenda, Kondwani Joseph Banda +3
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{abraham2026association,
  title = {{Association and discriminatory performance of body roundness index for dysglycemia among adults in Ethiopia}},
  author = {Ohide Peter Abraham and Yosef Wasihun Mengistie and Alamirew Enyew Belay and Gebeyaw Addis Bezie and Sinetibeb Tadesse Amsalu and Addis Dessie Agmas and Kibret Enyew Belay},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-62569-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62569-1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Association and discriminatory performance of body roundness index for dysglycemia among adults in Ethiopia
AU  - Ohide Peter Abraham
AU  - Yosef Wasihun Mengistie
AU  - Alamirew Enyew Belay
AU  - Gebeyaw Addis Bezie
AU  - Sinetibeb Tadesse Amsalu
AU  - Addis Dessie Agmas
AU  - Kibret Enyew Belay
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-62569-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62569-1
AB  - Body roundness index is a novel anthropometric measure of body fat based on height and waist circumference, but its association with dysglycemia remains understudied. We aimed to assess the association and discriminatory performance of between body roundness index and dysglycemia among adult patients at outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to assess the association. A total of 427 adults aged ≥ 35 years were included in this study. The mean body roundness index of the study population was 4.22 ± 1.12. BRI was significantly associated with higher odds of dysglycemia. A graded increase in risk was observed across BRI quartiles, with participants in the highest quartile (Q4) showing markedly increased odds compared with Q1 (AOR: 16.6; 95% CI: 7.09–39.14). Similar associations were observed for prediabetes (Q4 vs. Q1: AOR: 11.39; 95% CI: 3.73–34.76) and type 2 diabetes (Q4 vs. Q1: AOR: 29.2; 95% CI: 9.84–86.59). A receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that it had good discriminatory ability for dysglycemia (AUC 0.813, 95% CI: 0.772–0.854). When compared with other anthropometric indices, BRI demonstrated a comparable AUC to BMI (0.810; 95% CI: 0.769–0.850) and waist circumference (0.833; 95% CI: 0.796–0.871). The optimal body roundness index cutoff was 4.17 (sensitivity 73.6%, specificity 79.2%), with sex-specific cutoffs of 4.02 for males and 4.17 for females. Body roundness index showed a strong, graded association with dysglycemia.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -