Performance of Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Mohs Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment
- 1Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dental Medicine and Morphological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- 2Pathology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- 3Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale – IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Skin Cancer Center, Reggio Emilia, Italy
Abstract
Introduction: Ex vivo confocal microscopy (EVCM) enables rapid intraoperative margin assessment of cutaneous tumors in Mohs and slow-Mohs surgery.
Objectives: To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of EVCM in margin-controlled surgery across device types, imaging modalities, surgical techniques, and reader expertise.
Methods & Materials: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Scopus were searched to January 2025 for English-language studies evaluating EVCM against histopathology. A bivariate random-effects model pooled sensitivity and specificity. Summary ROC curves, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios, heterogeneity, and QUADAS-2 risk of bias were evaluated.
Results: Fourteen studies (2009–2024; 1,178 patients, 2,811 margins) met inclusion criteria, with 11 contributing 13 datasets to the quantitative meta-analysis. Devices included VivaScope 2000/2500 and Histolog Scanner using reflectance, fluorescence, or digital staining. Pooled sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95) and specificity was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.84–0.97). The HSROC curve showed an AUC of 0.96. Pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were approximately 13 and 0.10, respectively. Deeks' test showed no funnel-plot asymmetry (P = 0.33).
Conclusion: EVCM shows high diagnostic accuracy for intraoperative margin assessment. However, substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity warrants cautious interpretation. Standardized protocols, structured training, and multicenter prospective studies are needed to define its clinical role.
Related
- Intraoperative Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy for Surgical Margin Assessment in Squamous Cell and Basal Cell Carcinoma (HISTOBLOC): Protocol for a Prospective Monocentric Pilot Study
- Corneal Confocal Microscopy (CCM) in Patients With Central Neurodegenerative Disease
- CSwinFK: a bidirectional cross-attention CNN-Swin Transformer fusion model for fungal keratitis classification in in vivo confocal microscopy images
- The Kefallinia Score: Development and Apparent Performance Assessment of a Flow Cytometry-Based Intraoperative Classification System for Intracranial Tumors
- Protocol for confocal microscopy-based localization of chorismate mutase protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in trans-Golgi compartment.
BibTeX
@article{spadafora2026performance,
title = {{Performance of Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Mohs Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment}},
author = {Marco Spadafora and Serena Morsia and Moira Ragazzi and Margherita Raucci and Shaniko Kaleci and Caterina Longo},
journal = {Dermatology Practical \& Conceptual},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5826/dpc.1604a7357},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1604a7357},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Performance of Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Mohs Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment
AU - Marco Spadafora
AU - Serena Morsia
AU - Moira Ragazzi
AU - Margherita Raucci
AU - Shaniko Kaleci
AU - Caterina Longo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/29
JO - Dermatology Practical & Conceptual
DO - 10.5826/dpc.1604a7357
UR - https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1604a7357
AB - Introduction: Ex vivo confocal microscopy (EVCM) enables rapid intraoperative margin assessment of cutaneous tumors in Mohs and slow-Mohs surgery. Objectives: To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of EVCM in margin-controlled surgery across device types, imaging modalities, surgical techniques, and reader expertise. Methods & Materials: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Scopus were searched to January 2025 for English-language studies evaluating EVCM against histopathology. A bivariate random-effects model pooled sensitivity and specificity. Summary ROC curves, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios, heterogeneity, and QUADAS-2 risk of bias were evaluated. Results: Fourteen studies (2009–2024; 1,178 patients, 2,811 margins) met inclusion criteria, with 11 contributing 13 datasets to the quantitative meta-analysis. Devices included VivaScope 2000/2500 and Histolog Scanner using reflectance, fluorescence, or digital staining. Pooled sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95) and specificity was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.84–0.97). The HSROC curve showed an AUC of 0.96. Pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were approximately 13 and 0.10, respectively. Deeks' test showed no funnel-plot asymmetry (P = 0.33). Conclusion: EVCM shows high diagnostic accuracy for intraoperative margin assessment. However, substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity warrants cautious interpretation. Standardized protocols, structured training, and multicenter prospective studies are needed to define its clinical role.
SN - 2160-9381
ER -