Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Having nearby facilities matters: Adolescents’ neighborhood-based activities in rural contexts

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is marked by declining physical activity and increasing loneliness. Neighborhood activity facilities may encourage adolescents to be physically and socially active, highlighting the potential role of everyday environments in supporting leisure engagement. Research examining whether access to activity facilities supports neighborhood-based activities is limited, particularly in rural contexts where facilities are more dispersed. This study aimed to examine associations between access to neighborhood activity facilities and adolescents’ neighborhood-based physical and social activities in rural settings.

Methods: This cross-sectional study combined survey data from 924 5th – 10th graders attending 23 schools across six Norwegian municipalities with geospatial data on neighborhood activity facilities. Associations between adolescents’ neighborhood-based physical and social activities and access to facilities within a 500 m residential buffer were examined using generalized estimating equations. Analyses were adjusted for sex, school level, socioeconomic status, and population density.

Results: Of the 924 adolescents, 50% participated in neighborhood-based physical activities and 71% in informal social activities with peers at least 1–2 times per week. Access to an indoor sports facility within 500 m was associated with higher odds of frequent neighborhood physical activity (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.20–2.94). Access to an indoor sports facility (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.28–2.87) and a playground (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.16–2.25) was associated with more frequent participation in informal social activities.

Conclusions: Access to facilities alone may be insufficient to support adolescents’ neighborhood-based activities in rural settings. Different types of facilities appear to support engagement in distinct activities, with indoor sports facilities potentially serving as weather-independent and socially salient spaces for activity and peer interaction.

Key messages: • Having access to an indoor sports facility in the immediate neighborhood supports physical and social neighborhood activity among adolescents in rural areas.

• Planning for health-promoting rural communities should ensure nearby access to year round activity facilities, recognizing them as essential infrastructure for both physical and social activities.

Related

  1. How different social contexts shape adolescents’ participation in extracurricular physical activities in western China: an analysis based on mixed-methods research
    Xielin Zhou, Wenfang Yin
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  2. Surveillance of Athletes’ Health in Resource-Constrained African Sports Contexts: Why Context Matters and Time To Catch Up
    International journal of sports physical therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Residential relocation, neighborhood walkability, and changes in walking activities in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area: a cross-sectional study
    Wutt Yee Myo Myint, Shohei Nagata, Tomoya Hanibuchi +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. Neighborhood Disadvantage and Comorbid Mental Health Conditions in Adolescents and Young Adults With Eating Disorders
    Anita V. Chaphekar, Qing Duan, Janet Zahner +1
    The International Journal of Eating DisordersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  5. Subclinical and attenuated negative symptoms in the prediction of psychosis in children and adolescents: sample composition matters
    Santiago Cabrera, Naweed Osman, Chantal Michel +7
    European Child & Adolescent PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text3 citedPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{amundsen2026having,
  title = {{Having nearby facilities matters: Adolescents’ neighborhood-based activities in rural contexts}},
  author = {G Amundsen and C Ihlebæk and ET Bere and ECA Nordbø},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.302},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.302},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Having nearby facilities matters: Adolescents’ neighborhood-based activities in rural contexts
AU  - G Amundsen
AU  - C Ihlebæk
AU  - ET Bere
AU  - ECA Nordbø
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.302
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.302
AB  - Background: Adolescence is marked by declining physical activity and increasing loneliness. Neighborhood activity facilities may encourage adolescents to be physically and socially active, highlighting the potential role of everyday environments in supporting leisure engagement. Research examining whether access to activity facilities supports neighborhood-based activities is limited, particularly in rural contexts where facilities are more dispersed. This study aimed to examine associations between access to neighborhood activity facilities and adolescents’ neighborhood-based physical and social activities in rural settings.  Methods: This cross-sectional study combined survey data from 924 5th – 10th graders attending 23 schools across six Norwegian municipalities with geospatial data on neighborhood activity facilities. Associations between adolescents’ neighborhood-based physical and social activities and access to facilities within a 500 m residential buffer were examined using generalized estimating equations. Analyses were adjusted for sex, school level, socioeconomic status, and population density.  Results: Of the 924 adolescents, 50% participated in neighborhood-based physical activities and 71% in informal social activities with peers at least 1–2 times per week. Access to an indoor sports facility within 500 m was associated with higher odds of frequent neighborhood physical activity (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.20–2.94). Access to an indoor sports facility (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.28–2.87) and a playground (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.16–2.25) was associated with more frequent participation in informal social activities.  Conclusions: Access to facilities alone may be insufficient to support adolescents’ neighborhood-based activities in rural settings. Different types of facilities appear to support engagement in distinct activities, with indoor sports facilities potentially serving as weather-independent and socially salient spaces for activity and peer interaction.  Key messages: • Having access to an indoor sports facility in the immediate neighborhood supports physical and social neighborhood activity among adolescents in rural areas.  • Planning for health-promoting rural communities should ensure nearby access to year round activity facilities, recognizing them as essential infrastructure for both physical and social activities.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -