Laxative use after cardiac arrest: exposure timing, treatment selection, and outcome interpretation
- 1Department of Gastroenterology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Abstract
We commend Duan et al. for examining laxative use after cardiac arrest. However, because follow-up began at return of spontaneous circulation, whereas exposure timing was not reported, the observed association may reflect both immortal time and treatment selection: patients who survived and recovered sufficiently may have been more likely to receive laxatives. A time-varying exposure defined by first administration, with landmark analysis as a sensitivity analysis, would better align treatment and risk time. The reported time-varying-effect model does not estimate the effect of initiating treatment on a particular day and, therefore, cannot support a 15-day treatment window. The findings should be framed as observational associations rather than evidence that laxatives improve survival.
Related
- A physiology-based approach to ROTEM interpretation for bleeding management in cardiac surgery: A narrative review.
- Clinical context enhances interpretation of extracorporeal treatment criteria in lithium poisoning
- Refining cardiac resynchronization therapy selection in borderline QRS duration patients
- Anticholinergic Co-Medication Burden Does Not Predict Cardiac Toxicity in Adolescent Diphenhydramine Exposure: A Pharmacovigilance Study of the FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System
- Nephrocalcinosis and Foam Cell-rich Medullary Interstitial Nephropathy in a Patient with Laxative-induced Hypokalemia
BibTeX
@article{sun2026laxative,
title = {{Laxative use after cardiac arrest: exposure timing, treatment selection, and outcome interpretation}},
author = {Jian Sun and Peihong Li and Hongyi Hu},
journal = {Journal of Intensive Care},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s40560-026-00950-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-026-00950-y},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Laxative use after cardiac arrest: exposure timing, treatment selection, and outcome interpretation
AU - Jian Sun
AU - Peihong Li
AU - Hongyi Hu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Journal of Intensive Care
DO - 10.1186/s40560-026-00950-y
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-026-00950-y
AB - We commend Duan et al. for examining laxative use after cardiac arrest. However, because follow-up began at return of spontaneous circulation, whereas exposure timing was not reported, the observed association may reflect both immortal time and treatment selection: patients who survived and recovered sufficiently may have been more likely to receive laxatives. A time-varying exposure defined by first administration, with landmark analysis as a sensitivity analysis, would better align treatment and risk time. The reported time-varying-effect model does not estimate the effect of initiating treatment on a particular day and, therefore, cannot support a 15-day treatment window. The findings should be framed as observational associations rather than evidence that laxatives improve survival.
SN - 2052-0492
ER -