Survivorship Care Plan: Correlation between Practitioners and a Digital Tool (LOG-After)
Abstract
Objective: To compare survivorship care plans (SCPs) generated by the digital tool LOG-after with those proposed by oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and radiation oncologists for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors. LOG-after was developed through a participatory approach within the Grand Ouest Cancer de l'Enfant network and subsequently disseminated to other French comprehensive cancer centers to support the implementation of individualized, evidence-based survivorship care. This study was conducted as part of the Institut National du Cancer-funded Toxicity and Health after Irradiation on Neurocognition in Kids project. Study design: A questionnaire comprising 3 clinical cases (acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Hodgkin's lymphoma, and nephroblastoma) was circulated among 3 national networks (Société Française des Cancers de l'Enfant, Adolescents and Young Adults Group, and Pediatric Radiotherapy). Responses were compared with SCPs generated by LOG-after, and attitudes were discussed in workshops. Results: Thirty-six practitioners participated, including 5 radiation oncologists. Thirteen respondents considered themselves experts in survivorship care. SCP varied significantly between practitioners, with no complete agreement. However, there was greater alignment between the software and practitioners for high-grade recommendations, particularly among experts (eg, 100% of experts recommended postanthracycline cardiac monitoring). Conclusions: Given the observed heterogeneity, the LOG-after tool, which integrates the latest recommendations, is expected to improve SCP by enhancing consistency and reducing unnecessary screenings. During the workshops, participants considered the algorithm to be generally aligned with published guidelines, confirming its potential to facilitate their broader dissemination. This digital tool can help standardize evidence-based survivorship care, potentially increase consistency in monitoring, and potentially lead to better long-term health outcomes for cancer survivors.
Related
- Management of diagnostic uncertainty in teleconsultation by General Practitioners (GPs) in primary care
- Optimising digital volume correlation across materials: a practical framework for accuracy and spatial resolution
- Cytological Grading of Palpable Breast Lesions: Comparative Analysis of Masood, Modified Masood, and Yokohama system with Cytohistological Correlation at a Newly Established Tertiary Care Center in South India.
- From skills to smart care: The mediating role of digital literacy in the relationship between digital competence and medical artificial intelligence readiness among nursing students
- Psychometric validation of the perceived digital well-being scale and digital well-being questionnaire among adolescents receiving psychiatric care
BibTeX
@article{bertrand2026survivorship,
title = {{Survivorship Care Plan: Correlation between Practitioners and a Digital Tool (LOG-After)}},
author = {Amandine Bertrand and Isabelle Pellier and Marie-Dominique Tabone and Véronique Christophe and Isabelle Ray-Coquard and Christine Rousset-Jablonski and Les Aguerris and Pascal Veillon and Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt},
journal = {The Journal of Pediatrics: Clinical Practice},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.jpedcp.2026.200234},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05801017v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Survivorship Care Plan: Correlation between Practitioners and a Digital Tool (LOG-After)
AU - Amandine Bertrand
AU - Isabelle Pellier
AU - Marie-Dominique Tabone
AU - Véronique Christophe
AU - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
AU - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
AU - Les Aguerris
AU - Pascal Veillon
AU - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/15
JO - The Journal of Pediatrics: Clinical Practice
DO - 10.1016/j.jpedcp.2026.200234
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05801017v1
AB - Objective: To compare survivorship care plans (SCPs) generated by the digital tool LOG-after with those proposed by oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and radiation oncologists for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors. LOG-after was developed through a participatory approach within the Grand Ouest Cancer de l'Enfant network and subsequently disseminated to other French comprehensive cancer centers to support the implementation of individualized, evidence-based survivorship care. This study was conducted as part of the Institut National du Cancer-funded Toxicity and Health after Irradiation on Neurocognition in Kids project. Study design: A questionnaire comprising 3 clinical cases (acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Hodgkin's lymphoma, and nephroblastoma) was circulated among 3 national networks (Société Française des Cancers de l'Enfant, Adolescents and Young Adults Group, and Pediatric Radiotherapy). Responses were compared with SCPs generated by LOG-after, and attitudes were discussed in workshops. Results: Thirty-six practitioners participated, including 5 radiation oncologists. Thirteen respondents considered themselves experts in survivorship care. SCP varied significantly between practitioners, with no complete agreement. However, there was greater alignment between the software and practitioners for high-grade recommendations, particularly among experts (eg, 100% of experts recommended postanthracycline cardiac monitoring). Conclusions: Given the observed heterogeneity, the LOG-after tool, which integrates the latest recommendations, is expected to improve SCP by enhancing consistency and reducing unnecessary screenings. During the workshops, participants considered the algorithm to be generally aligned with published guidelines, confirming its potential to facilitate their broader dissemination. This digital tool can help standardize evidence-based survivorship care, potentially increase consistency in monitoring, and potentially lead to better long-term health outcomes for cancer survivors.
SN - 2950-5410
SN - 2950-5410
ER -