Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The Reach of Treatment Effects: Randomization Inference for Zero-Effect Regions

Abstract

A treatment may affect some individuals while leaving others unaffected. We study the reach of treatment effects by asking how large an unaffected covariate region could be. We develop efficient local randomization tests over nearest-neighbour regions to construct a finite-sample valid upper confidence bound for the size of the largest zero-effect region. A small bound provides evidence that treatment effects extend broadly across covariate values by ruling out large zero-effect regions. Under a general outcome model, we characterize how the size of the bound depends on the number of affected units, the size of their treatment effects, and the geometry of the true zero-effect set. We show that, when region size is measured as a sample fraction, the excess of the upper confidence bound over the true size decreases to zero at a minimax optimal rate up to a logarithmic factor. Numerical simulations assess the coverage, power and computational efficiency of our method. Applications to voter-turnout, HIV clinical-trial, and AI-assisted writing data illustrate how our method rules out large zero-effect regions across the covariates of interest.

Related

  1. Randomization inference on cell effects under absorbing treatment onset
    Xinyuan Chen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Randomization Inference: Theory and Applications
    David M. Ritzwoller, Joseph P. Romano, Azeem M. Shaikh
    Journal of Political Economy MicroeconomicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text6 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. Selective Randomization Inference for Interference
    Takahide Yanagi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Randomization Inference with Concentration Inequalities
    Tobias Freidling
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Randomization Inference for Matched Pairs with Binary Outcomes
    Bob Wilson
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{li2026reach,
  title = {{The Reach of Treatment Effects: Randomization Inference for Zero-Effect Regions}},
  author = {Pengyu Li and Yao Zhang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.20759},
  eprint = {2610.20759},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20759},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Reach of Treatment Effects: Randomization Inference for Zero-Effect Regions
AU  - Pengyu Li
AU  - Yao Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.20759
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20759
AB  - A treatment may affect some individuals while leaving others unaffected. We study the reach of treatment effects by asking how large an unaffected covariate region could be. We develop efficient local randomization tests over nearest-neighbour regions to construct a finite-sample valid upper confidence bound for the size of the largest zero-effect region. A small bound provides evidence that treatment effects extend broadly across covariate values by ruling out large zero-effect regions. Under a general outcome model, we characterize how the size of the bound depends on the number of affected units, the size of their treatment effects, and the geometry of the true zero-effect set. We show that, when region size is measured as a sample fraction, the excess of the upper confidence bound over the true size decreases to zero at a minimax optimal rate up to a logarithmic factor. Numerical simulations assess the coverage, power and computational efficiency of our method. Applications to voter-turnout, HIV clinical-trial, and AI-assisted writing data illustrate how our method rules out large zero-effect regions across the covariates of interest.
ER  -