Integrated nutrition-sensitive interventions are associated with improvements in household food security and dietary diversity among vulnerable women in the host communities of Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh: Findings from a pre-post comparison study
4 affiliations
- 1Centre for Non-communicable Diseases and Nutrition, BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- 2Institute of Applied Statistics and Data Science (IASDS), University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- 3UNICEF, Cox’s Bazar Field Office, Bangladesh
- 4UNICEF, Bangladesh
Abstract
Introduction: Nutrition-sensitive interventions aim to improve or at least safeguard the underlying causes of malnutrition, especially among the most vulnerable populations. Integrated nutrition-sensitive interventions are effective strategies for improving household food security and dietary diversity in low-income settings. In 2021, the European Union (EU) and UNICEF, in collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh and partners, implemented nutrition-sensitive interventions combining two income-generating activities (IGAs): backyard poultry rearing and tailoring with asset transfers, direct cash support, and nutrition education for vulnerable women in the host communities of Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. We evaluated the association of these interventions with household food security and dietary diversity among vulnerable women. Materials and methods: We analyzed data from two rounds (2022 and 2024) of repeated cross-sectional surveys involving 1,255 vulnerable women (638 in 2022 and 617 in 2024) across four upazilas in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Covariates were initially imbalanced across groups because the interventions were not randomly assigned; therefore, we employed propensity score weighting to balance the covariates between the two groups. We used modified Poisson regression and binomial regression models to estimate the association between exposure and outcomes from the pseudo-population obtained by propensity score weighting. All the inferences in this manuscript were based on a 5% significance level. Results: In 2024, vulnerable women had a 53% higher likelihood of household food security (RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.27–1.85, p < 0.001) than in 2022. Similarly, dietary diversity of vulnerable women increased markedly, showing over two and a half-fold higher likelihood of adequate dietary diversity in 2024 (RR = 2.78, 95% CI: 2.36–3.27, p < 0.001). The E-values corresponding to the associations of food security and dietary diversity with survey year were 2.44 and 5.00, respectively, on the risk ratio scale, which shows that the findings were less sensitive to unmeasured confounders. Conclusion: Household food security and dietary diversity substantially increased over time among vulnerable women in the study areas. As the study was a two-repeated cross-sectional survey, residual confounding and other time-varying contextual factors cannot be excluded, so the observed differences should not be interpreted as definitive causal effects of the intervention. Future controlled or longitudinal evaluations are needed to establish the causal effectiveness and long-term sustainability of integrated nutrition-sensitive interventions.
Related
- Community-based delivery of lifesaving maternal and newborn health interventions in vulnerable Ethiopian communities: Lessons from implementation research
- Beyond the green myth: a scoping review of spatial justice and structural barriers to therapeutic urban agriculture for vulnerable communities
- Interventions during pregnancy and the postnatal period for parents in vulnerable life situations
- Sustaining Integrated Care for Vulnerable Youth: A Longitudinal Case Study of the Regina Intersectoral Partnership (TRiP)
- Health system readiness to deliver integrated early childhood interventions: a scoping review protocol
BibTeX
@article{afroz2026integrated,
title = {{Integrated nutrition-sensitive interventions are associated with improvements in household food security and dietary diversity among vulnerable women in the host communities of Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh: Findings from a pre-post comparison study}},
author = {Munia Afroz and Sakib Rahman and Fahmida Akter and Md. Mokbul Hossain and Mahbub A.H.M. Latif and Owen White Nkhoma and Jecinter Akinyi Oketch and Raihana Bhuiyan and Kiross Tefera Abebe and Deepika Mehrish Sharma and Farhana Sharmin and Mohammad Zahidul Manir and Md. Lalan Miah and Anjuman Tahmina Ferdous and Rina Rani Paul and Malay Kanti Mridha},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0362124},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362124},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Integrated nutrition-sensitive interventions are associated with improvements in household food security and dietary diversity among vulnerable women in the host communities of Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh: Findings from a pre-post comparison study
AU - Munia Afroz
AU - Sakib Rahman
AU - Fahmida Akter
AU - Md. Mokbul Hossain
AU - Mahbub A.H.M. Latif
AU - Owen White Nkhoma
AU - Jecinter Akinyi Oketch
AU - Raihana Bhuiyan
AU - Kiross Tefera Abebe
AU - Deepika Mehrish Sharma
AU - Farhana Sharmin
AU - Mohammad Zahidul Manir
AU - Md. Lalan Miah
AU - Anjuman Tahmina Ferdous
AU - Rina Rani Paul
AU - Malay Kanti Mridha
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/05
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0362124
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362124
AB - Introduction: Nutrition-sensitive interventions aim to improve or at least safeguard the underlying causes of malnutrition, especially among the most vulnerable populations. Integrated nutrition-sensitive interventions are effective strategies for improving household food security and dietary diversity in low-income settings. In 2021, the European Union (EU) and UNICEF, in collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh and partners, implemented nutrition-sensitive interventions combining two income-generating activities (IGAs): backyard poultry rearing and tailoring with asset transfers, direct cash support, and nutrition education for vulnerable women in the host communities of Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. We evaluated the association of these interventions with household food security and dietary diversity among vulnerable women. Materials and methods: We analyzed data from two rounds (2022 and 2024) of repeated cross-sectional surveys involving 1,255 vulnerable women (638 in 2022 and 617 in 2024) across four upazilas in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Covariates were initially imbalanced across groups because the interventions were not randomly assigned; therefore, we employed propensity score weighting to balance the covariates between the two groups. We used modified Poisson regression and binomial regression models to estimate the association between exposure and outcomes from the pseudo-population obtained by propensity score weighting. All the inferences in this manuscript were based on a 5% significance level. Results: In 2024, vulnerable women had a 53% higher likelihood of household food security (RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.27–1.85, p < 0.001) than in 2022. Similarly, dietary diversity of vulnerable women increased markedly, showing over two and a half-fold higher likelihood of adequate dietary diversity in 2024 (RR = 2.78, 95% CI: 2.36–3.27, p < 0.001). The E-values corresponding to the associations of food security and dietary diversity with survey year were 2.44 and 5.00, respectively, on the risk ratio scale, which shows that the findings were less sensitive to unmeasured confounders. Conclusion: Household food security and dietary diversity substantially increased over time among vulnerable women in the study areas. As the study was a two-repeated cross-sectional survey, residual confounding and other time-varying contextual factors cannot be excluded, so the observed differences should not be interpreted as definitive causal effects of the intervention. Future controlled or longitudinal evaluations are needed to establish the causal effectiveness and long-term sustainability of integrated nutrition-sensitive interventions.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -