Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in neurology

The value of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the diagnostic assessment of dysphagia after craniocerebral injury.

  1. 1Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou Normal University, Huzhou, China.
  2. 2Neurosurgery, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou, China.

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to explore the value of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the diagnostic assessment of dysphagia after craniocerebral injury.Methods

To investigate the role of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in dysphagia diagnosis, we prospectively analyzed BAEP findings and gold-standard diagnoses in 106 patients with head injury. Inclusion criteria: ① Age 18-70 years old; ② Diagnosed by Chinese Expert Consensus on Evaluation and Treatment of Dysphagia. Exclusion criteria: ① Patients with a Glasgow coma scale score ≤8 and patients who cannot be managed with intervention; ② Previous comorbidities that may affect swallowing function.Results

A total of 65 males and 41 females patients were enrolled. The positive rate of BAEP in moderate to severe dysphagia was 86.96%, which was significantly higher than that in the mild dysphagia group (45.95%; p < 0.01). 60 patients were BAEP-positive and moderate-to-severe dysphagia patients, and considered neurogenic dysphagia, 46 patients were BAEP-negative, and considered non-neurophagia. The AUC of BAEP diagnosis of moderate to severe dysphagia was 0.705.Conclusion

BAEP can be used as an accurate diagnostic method for nerve injury, it is helpful to identify whether it is a neurological dysphagia.

Related

  1. Normal Early Investigations Do Not Exclude Bickerstaff Brainstem Encephalitis: Highlighting Diagnostic and Treatment Pitfalls
    Hidaya Kmail, Mohammad Jaradat, Ahmad Abbas +3
    Case Reports in Neurological MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  2. Brainstem Cavernous Malformation Mimicking Glioma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Rare Diagnostic Pitfall.
    Arturs Laganovskis, Julija Dolgopolova, Cenk Eraslan +4
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  3. Mapping the Diagnostic Space of Auditory Brainstem Responses: An Interpretable Framework for Classification
    L. Clementi, D. Cazzato, E. Visani +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurologymedRxiv
  4. Assessment of antibacterial and antioxidant potentials of Aspergillus fumigatus crude extract, the isolated endophyte from Centella asiatica (L.) urban supported by molecular docking
    Abdur Rahman, Abdul Ali Bhuiyan, Muhammad Meshkat Hossain +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  5. Diagnostic Assessment of Tamoxifen-Associated Endometrial Pathology: A Narrative Review of Biomarkers, Risk Models, and Translational Gaps
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{fei2026value,
  title = {{The value of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the diagnostic assessment of dysphagia after craniocerebral injury.}},
  author = {Zhen-Hai Fei and Xing-Ming Zhong and Yong Cai and Li-Ying Dong},
  journal = {Frontiers in neurology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1838871},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898171},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The value of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the diagnostic assessment of dysphagia after craniocerebral injury.
AU  - Zhen-Hai Fei
AU  - Xing-Ming Zhong
AU  - Yong Cai
AU  - Li-Ying Dong
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Frontiers in neurology
DO  - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1838871
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898171
AB  - Purpose  The aim of this study was to explore the value of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the diagnostic assessment of dysphagia after craniocerebral injury.Methods  To investigate the role of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in dysphagia diagnosis, we prospectively analyzed BAEP findings and gold-standard diagnoses in 106 patients with head injury. Inclusion criteria: ① Age 18-70 years old; ② Diagnosed by Chinese Expert Consensus on Evaluation and Treatment of Dysphagia. Exclusion criteria: ① Patients with a Glasgow coma scale score ≤8 and patients who cannot be managed with intervention; ② Previous comorbidities that may affect swallowing function.Results  A total of 65 males and 41 females patients were enrolled. The positive rate of BAEP in moderate to severe dysphagia was 86.96%, which was significantly higher than that in the mild dysphagia group (45.95%; p < 0.01). 60 patients were BAEP-positive and moderate-to-severe dysphagia patients, and considered neurogenic dysphagia, 46 patients were BAEP-negative, and considered non-neurophagia. The AUC of BAEP diagnosis of moderate to severe dysphagia was 0.705.Conclusion  BAEP can be used as an accurate diagnostic method for nerve injury, it is helpful to identify whether it is a neurological dysphagia.
SN  - 1664-2295
ER  -