Closing the gap: A two-site MLC matching study for Varian TrueBeam Linear Accelerators
Abstract
Purpose: To characterise and harmonise multileaf collimator (MLC) gap calibrations across four beam-matched TrueBeams and assess a common planning-system model. Methods: Four Millennium 120 TrueBeams were studied: TS1 (installed 2016), TS5 (2021), TS6 and TS7 (2024). Gap calibration was assessed by RayStation sweeping-gap measurement, feeler gauge, the EPID-based Stakitt Fence test, and a leaf-resolved Machine Performance Check (MPC). TS1 and TS5 were adjusted in service mode, TS5 also for MLC centreline offset. Ten clinical VMAT plans, and six acquired earlier on an unadjusted reference machine, were measured with an ArcCHECK 1220 against doses computed at 0.053 and 0.065 cm x-offsets in RayStation. Results: The 2024 machines had wider baseline gaps. All four methods registered the TS1 and TS5 changes in the same direction and within 0.060 mm of predictions. After adjustment TS1 and TS5 lay within the TS6/TS7 sweeping-gap and Stakitt ranges but read wider on the feeler gauge. A conventional picket-fence test on TS5 registered no change. Raising the RayStation x-offset parameter increased mean local 3%/2 mm pass rates from 92.3% to 94.8% on TS1 and 93.2% to 95.6% on TS5; all 24 plan-criterion pairs improved on the unadjusted machine. Conclusions: Mechanical, EPID, and sweeping gap MLC gap measurements responded consistently to the MLC adjustment, moving TS1 and TS5 towards the local reference range. Every global 3%/2 mm ArcCHECK measurement exceeded the TG-218 95% limit.
Related
- Dosimetric Comparison of Functional Radiosurgery Treatments for Trigeminal Neuralgia, Essential Tremor, and Obsessive-compulsive Disorder Using Gamma Knife, CyberKnife, and Linear Accelerators
- Commissioning of Medical Linear Accelerators in India: A Survey of Regulatory Compliance, Clinical Implementation, and Professional Challenges
- Robust enhanced leaf model implementation for beam-matched linear accelerators: Impact of physical leaf gap variations.
- OptiLookUp: A Microring-Based Photonic Read-Only Memory Lookup Table Engine for Photonic Accelerators
- Controlling external injection in laser-plasma accelerators with terahertz frequency bunch manipulation
BibTeX
@misc{douglass2026closing,
title = {{Closing the gap: A two-site MLC matching study for Varian TrueBeam Linear Accelerators}},
author = {Michael Douglass and Corey Bridger and Mitchell Herrick and Joshua Southwell and Andrew Kennedy and Michael Barnes and Joerg Lehmann},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.16473},
eprint = {2609.16473},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16473},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Closing the gap: A two-site MLC matching study for Varian TrueBeam Linear Accelerators
AU - Michael Douglass
AU - Corey Bridger
AU - Mitchell Herrick
AU - Joshua Southwell
AU - Andrew Kennedy
AU - Michael Barnes
AU - Joerg Lehmann
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/15
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16473
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16473
AB - Purpose: To characterise and harmonise multileaf collimator (MLC) gap calibrations across four beam-matched TrueBeams and assess a common planning-system model. Methods: Four Millennium 120 TrueBeams were studied: TS1 (installed 2016), TS5 (2021), TS6 and TS7 (2024). Gap calibration was assessed by RayStation sweeping-gap measurement, feeler gauge, the EPID-based Stakitt Fence test, and a leaf-resolved Machine Performance Check (MPC). TS1 and TS5 were adjusted in service mode, TS5 also for MLC centreline offset. Ten clinical VMAT plans, and six acquired earlier on an unadjusted reference machine, were measured with an ArcCHECK 1220 against doses computed at 0.053 and 0.065 cm x-offsets in RayStation. Results: The 2024 machines had wider baseline gaps. All four methods registered the TS1 and TS5 changes in the same direction and within 0.060 mm of predictions. After adjustment TS1 and TS5 lay within the TS6/TS7 sweeping-gap and Stakitt ranges but read wider on the feeler gauge. A conventional picket-fence test on TS5 registered no change. Raising the RayStation x-offset parameter increased mean local 3%/2 mm pass rates from 92.3% to 94.8% on TS1 and 93.2% to 95.6% on TS5; all 24 plan-criterion pairs improved on the unadjusted machine. Conclusions: Mechanical, EPID, and sweeping gap MLC gap measurements responded consistently to the MLC adjustment, moving TS1 and TS5 towards the local reference range. Every global 3%/2 mm ArcCHECK measurement exceeded the TG-218 95% limit.
ER -