Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Polymers

Architecture-Specific Performance of Silica and MWCNT Modified Hybrid Epoxy Laminates Under Mechanical Loading and Fracture

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Civil Engineering, CECOS University of IT & Emerging Sciences, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
  2. 2Faculty of Engineering and Quantity Surveying (FEQS), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Nilai 71800, Malaysia
  3. 3Traffic Safety Engineer, Arkansas Department of Transportation, 10324 I-30, Little Rock, AR 72209, USA
  4. 4Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70503, USA
  5. 5STV Inc., 5750 Genesis Court, Suite 200, Frisco, TX 75034, USA

Abstract

Hybrid fiber-reinforced epoxy laminates integrate macroscale fiber architecture with nanoscale matrix modification. The effects of nanofillers cannot be isolated from laminate architecture when both variables are altered simultaneously. This study independently evaluated silica-modified Kevlar/basalt/alkali-resistant glass (K/B/ARG), silica-modified Kevlar/carbon/alkali-resistant glass (K/C/ARG), and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)-modified Kevlar/glass/carbon (K/G/C) laminates. Each laminate family incorporated 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, or 6.0 wt.% nanofiller. Mechanical performance was assessed using tensile, flexural, interlaminar-shear, quasi-static puncture, punch-shear, impact, and energy-absorption tests. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to examine fracture morphology, and selected K/C/ARG laminates underwent thermogravimetric analysis (TGA/DTG). For each architecture, 4.5 wt.% nanofiller yielded the highest mean values for most measured responses. At this concentration, K/B/ARG achieved 167.93 ± 5.71 MPa tensile strength, 112.09 ± 3.70 MPa puncture strength, and 1598.1 ± 73.5 J/m Izod impact strength. K/C/ARG achieved 171.95 ± 5.50 MPa tensile strength, 7710 ± 285.3 N puncture load, and 1813.6 ± 79.8 J/m Izod impact strength. K/G/C achieved 215.58 ± 7.76 MPa tensile strength, 28.49 ± 1.20 MPa interlaminar-shear strength, 110.80 ± 5.54 MPa punch-shear strength, and 15.45 ± 0.77 J net energy absorption. Several matrix-sensitive responses declined at 6.0 wt.%, while K/G/C flexural strength remained nearly constant. SEM revealed greater matrix retention and more uniform damage distribution at intermediate nanofiller loading but clustered weak regions at 6.0 wt.%. Single-run TGA indicated a higher principal DTG temperature and greater residue for the 4.5 wt.% K/C/ARG formulation; however, replication is necessary. The convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis was constrained by the limited number of formulation levels, target leakage, and the absence of independent validation. Consequently, 4.5 wt.% is identified as the best-performing tested concentration within each architecture, rather than a universal optimum. Additional durability, fire, and structural-scale testing is required before these laminates can be considered for building design, resilient infrastructure, or sustainable construction.

Related

  1. Experimental Study on Static Strength and Fatigue of CNT-Modified CFRP Laminates
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
  2. The Effect of Silicone Modification on the Thermo-Oxidative Degradation and Mechanical Property Retention of CFRP Laminates
    Junkang Xia, Yundong Ji, Jingang Liu +6
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Geometry-Associated Mechanical Trends of Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotube SPEEK Sizings in CF/PEEK Commingled Yarn Laminates
    Xuejiang Yu, Yousi Chen, Ai Lu
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Comparative Impact Response, Damage, and Healing Performance of CFRP Laminates with Different Thicknesses and Reinforcement Architectures
    Maryna Shevtsova, Valentin Rougier, Véronique Michaud +2
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Instantaneous Mechanical Programming of Polymer Microparticle Shape and Surface Architecture
    Tomoki Nakagami, Akihide Arima, Mayuka Mishima +6
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@article{bashir2026architecturespecific,
  title = {{Architecture-Specific Performance of Silica and MWCNT Modified Hybrid Epoxy Laminates Under Mechanical Loading and Fracture}},
  author = {Muhammad Tariq Bashir and Khawaja Atif Naseem and Atif Khan and Muhammad Rehan Sadiq and Md. Munir Hayet Khan and Muhammad Ali Sikandar},
  journal = {Polymers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/polym18202463},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2463},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Architecture-Specific Performance of Silica and MWCNT Modified Hybrid Epoxy Laminates Under Mechanical Loading and Fracture
AU  - Muhammad Tariq Bashir
AU  - Khawaja Atif Naseem
AU  - Atif Khan
AU  - Muhammad Rehan Sadiq
AU  - Md. Munir Hayet Khan
AU  - Muhammad Ali Sikandar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Polymers
DO  - 10.3390/polym18202463
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2463
AB  - Hybrid fiber-reinforced epoxy laminates integrate macroscale fiber architecture with nanoscale matrix modification. The effects of nanofillers cannot be isolated from laminate architecture when both variables are altered simultaneously. This study independently evaluated silica-modified Kevlar/basalt/alkali-resistant glass (K/B/ARG), silica-modified Kevlar/carbon/alkali-resistant glass (K/C/ARG), and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)-modified Kevlar/glass/carbon (K/G/C) laminates. Each laminate family incorporated 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, or 6.0 wt.% nanofiller. Mechanical performance was assessed using tensile, flexural, interlaminar-shear, quasi-static puncture, punch-shear, impact, and energy-absorption tests. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to examine fracture morphology, and selected K/C/ARG laminates underwent thermogravimetric analysis (TGA/DTG). For each architecture, 4.5 wt.% nanofiller yielded the highest mean values for most measured responses. At this concentration, K/B/ARG achieved 167.93 ± 5.71 MPa tensile strength, 112.09 ± 3.70 MPa puncture strength, and 1598.1 ± 73.5 J/m Izod impact strength. K/C/ARG achieved 171.95 ± 5.50 MPa tensile strength, 7710 ± 285.3 N puncture load, and 1813.6 ± 79.8 J/m Izod impact strength. K/G/C achieved 215.58 ± 7.76 MPa tensile strength, 28.49 ± 1.20 MPa interlaminar-shear strength, 110.80 ± 5.54 MPa punch-shear strength, and 15.45 ± 0.77 J net energy absorption. Several matrix-sensitive responses declined at 6.0 wt.%, while K/G/C flexural strength remained nearly constant. SEM revealed greater matrix retention and more uniform damage distribution at intermediate nanofiller loading but clustered weak regions at 6.0 wt.%. Single-run TGA indicated a higher principal DTG temperature and greater residue for the 4.5 wt.% K/C/ARG formulation; however, replication is necessary. The convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis was constrained by the limited number of formulation levels, target leakage, and the absence of independent validation. Consequently, 4.5 wt.% is identified as the best-performing tested concentration within each architecture, rather than a universal optimum. Additional durability, fire, and structural-scale testing is required before these laminates can be considered for building design, resilient infrastructure, or sustainable construction.
SN  - 2073-4360
ER  -