Comparative Impact Response, Damage, and Healing Performance of CFRP Laminates with Different Thicknesses and Reinforcement Architectures
- 1Laboratory of Composite Materials, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
- 2Laboratory for Processing of Advanced Composites, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
- 3Department of Aviation and Manufacturing Engineering, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine
Abstract
Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates can exhibit different low-velocity impact responses and post-impact performance depending on laminate configuration. This study compares three self-healing CFRP configurations manufactured from CompPair HealTech® materials: 1.45 and 3.30 mm unidirectional (UD) laminates and a 2.66 mm woven laminate. Low-velocity impact tests were performed at 5 and 10 J. Internal damage was qualitatively examined using visual inspection and X-ray phase-contrast imaging (XPCI), while post-impact performance and recovery were assessed by compression-after-impact (CAI) testing before and after thermal healing. The 1.45 mm UD laminate exhibited the largest displacement and lowest maximum impact force, whereas the 3.30 mm UD laminate showed the highest force and smallest displacement, with the woven laminate exhibiting an intermediate response. Despite its greater impact stiffness, the 3.30 mm UD laminate showed the largest relative reduction in residual compressive strength after 10 J, with strength retention decreasing from approximately 98% after 5 J to 64% after 10 J. The 1.45 mm UD and woven laminates retained 89% and 88% after 5 J and 82% and 72% after 10 J, respectively. After healing, the 1.45 mm UD and woven laminates recovered to approximately 99% of their virgin strengths after 5 J. After 10 J, strength retention reached 91%, 79%, and 81% for the 1.45 mm UD, 3.30 mm UD, and woven laminates, with corresponding healing efficiencies of 49%, 42%, and 31%, respectively. XPCI revealed configuration-dependent internal damage patterns that became more pronounced at 10 J. Overall, the investigated laminate configurations exhibited distinct impact responses, internal damage patterns, residual strengths, and levels of mechanical recovery after healing.
Related
- Comparative Analysis of Cohesive Laws for Predicting Stress Fields in Perforated Fiber Metal Laminates
- Architecture-Specific Performance of Silica and MWCNT Modified Hybrid Epoxy Laminates Under Mechanical Loading and Fracture
- Toroidal Dipole-Dominated High-Performance Optical Sensors via Nanoimprinted Tetramer Architectures.
- Multilayer perovskite air-electrode architectures for enhanced performance in intermediate-temperature solid oxide cells
- Composition–Structure–Property Relationships in PLA-nHA-Mg Hybrid Biocomposites: Effect of Ceramic–Metallic Reinforcement Ratio on Mechanical and Physicochemical Performance
BibTeX
@article{shevtsova2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative Impact Response, Damage, and Healing Performance of CFRP Laminates with Different Thicknesses and Reinforcement Architectures}},
author = {Maryna Shevtsova and Valentin Rougier and Véronique Michaud and Oleksii Vambol and Svitlana Purhina},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/polym18202532},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2532},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative Impact Response, Damage, and Healing Performance of CFRP Laminates with Different Thicknesses and Reinforcement Architectures
AU - Maryna Shevtsova
AU - Valentin Rougier
AU - Véronique Michaud
AU - Oleksii Vambol
AU - Svitlana Purhina
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Polymers
DO - 10.3390/polym18202532
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2532
AB - Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates can exhibit different low-velocity impact responses and post-impact performance depending on laminate configuration. This study compares three self-healing CFRP configurations manufactured from CompPair HealTech® materials: 1.45 and 3.30 mm unidirectional (UD) laminates and a 2.66 mm woven laminate. Low-velocity impact tests were performed at 5 and 10 J. Internal damage was qualitatively examined using visual inspection and X-ray phase-contrast imaging (XPCI), while post-impact performance and recovery were assessed by compression-after-impact (CAI) testing before and after thermal healing. The 1.45 mm UD laminate exhibited the largest displacement and lowest maximum impact force, whereas the 3.30 mm UD laminate showed the highest force and smallest displacement, with the woven laminate exhibiting an intermediate response. Despite its greater impact stiffness, the 3.30 mm UD laminate showed the largest relative reduction in residual compressive strength after 10 J, with strength retention decreasing from approximately 98% after 5 J to 64% after 10 J. The 1.45 mm UD and woven laminates retained 89% and 88% after 5 J and 82% and 72% after 10 J, respectively. After healing, the 1.45 mm UD and woven laminates recovered to approximately 99% of their virgin strengths after 5 J. After 10 J, strength retention reached 91%, 79%, and 81% for the 1.45 mm UD, 3.30 mm UD, and woven laminates, with corresponding healing efficiencies of 49%, 42%, and 31%, respectively. XPCI revealed configuration-dependent internal damage patterns that became more pronounced at 10 J. Overall, the investigated laminate configurations exhibited distinct impact responses, internal damage patterns, residual strengths, and levels of mechanical recovery after healing.
SN - 2073-4360
ER -