Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCmedRxiv

Hypnosis versus relaxation for anxiety in COPD pulmonary rehabilitation: a cluster-randomized trial

  1. 1INSERM, UMRS1158, University Hospital Pitie Salpetriere, Sorbonne University

Abstract

Rationale: Anxiety affects 22-56% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and predicts exacerbations, readmissions, and mortality. Mind-body adjuncts to pulmonary rehabilitation are recommended, but trials have lacked comparators isolating technique-specific effects and left determinants of individual benefit unexamined. Objectives: Testing whether adjunctive medical hypnosis reduces anxiety more than matched structured relaxation. Methods: Cluster-randomized, active-comparator trial with patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consecutive 4-week inpatient cohorts were randomized 1:1 to adjunctive hypnosis or structured relaxation matched on session length, practitioner pool, and framing. Primary outcome was the six-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory at week 4 (intention to treat). Complementary multidimensional metrics of anxiety were obtained for robustness. Exploratory analyses tested outcome moderation by baseline sensory-affective dyspnea burden. Measurements and Main Results: Of 80 participants (24 clusters), 79 were analyzed (hypnosis 36, relaxation 43). Hypnosis did not differ from relaxation on the primary outcome (+0.95 points; 95% credible interval -5.85 to 7.42; posterior probability of clinically important hypnosis advantage 0.12) or its complementary metrics. Anxiety improved in both arms (pooled -5.72 points; -9.35 to -2.00). Exploratory analyses showed that the hypnosis advantage rose with baseline sensory and fell with affective burden, reaching -9.26 points at a high-sensory, low-affective profile (-23.37 to 4.71; posterior probability of clinically important hypnosis advantage 0.81). No deaths or serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Anxiety improved with no advantage of hypnosis over matched relaxation. Exploratory analysis suggests greater hypnosis benefit in patients with predominantly sensory dyspnea, proposing a candidate phenotype for stratified trials.

Related

  1. Conversational hypnosis versus standard of care to reduce anxiety in patients undergoing marker placement under radiographic control prior to breast cancer surgery: A randomized, multicenter trial
    Lydie Lemoine, Virginie Adam, Xavier Galus +12
    Frontiers in PsychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text8 citedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. Integrated rehabilitation for post-stroke anxiety: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
    Shenglu Xu, Keqin Ye, Shiyu Zhang +6
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Psychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  3. Can Jacobson’s Progressive Muscle Relaxation Technique Affect Anxiety Indices, Pain, and Vital Signs in Patients Undergoing Discectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ali Rahimi, Fatemeh Moghadasi, Ali Jadidi +2
    Journal of Pain ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineDOAJPMC
  4. Effects of Nurse-Led Promoting Advance Care Planning (NLP-ACP) on intention to engage in advance care planning and death anxiety among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Thailand: A randomized controlled trial.
    Leelawadee Kloyeium, Yaowarat Matchim, Satreerat Junkroot +1
    Belitung nursing journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Relaxation interventions in neurological rehabilitation: a scoping review.
    Pia Rings, Juliana Dziurla, Tine Van Damme +3
    Journal of rehabilitation medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{ghergan2026hypnosis,
  title = {{Hypnosis versus relaxation for anxiety in COPD pulmonary rehabilitation: a cluster-randomized trial}},
  author = {A. Ghergan and B. Herer and F. Larue and D. Sambourg and I. Segundo and Y. Bocahu and C. Moulin and A. Delignieres and T. Similowski and C. Morelot-Panzini and H. Anllo},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.07.20.26358482},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.20.26358482v2},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Hypnosis versus relaxation for anxiety in COPD pulmonary rehabilitation: a cluster-randomized trial
AU  - A. Ghergan
AU  - B. Herer
AU  - F. Larue
AU  - D. Sambourg
AU  - I. Segundo
AU  - Y. Bocahu
AU  - C. Moulin
AU  - A. Delignieres
AU  - T. Similowski
AU  - C. Morelot-Panzini
AU  - H. Anllo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/20
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.07.20.26358482
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.20.26358482v2
AB  - Rationale: Anxiety affects 22-56% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and predicts exacerbations, readmissions, and mortality. Mind-body adjuncts to pulmonary rehabilitation are recommended, but trials have lacked comparators isolating technique-specific effects and left determinants of individual benefit unexamined. Objectives: Testing whether adjunctive medical hypnosis reduces anxiety more than matched structured relaxation. Methods: Cluster-randomized, active-comparator trial with patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consecutive 4-week inpatient cohorts were randomized 1:1 to adjunctive hypnosis or structured relaxation matched on session length, practitioner pool, and framing. Primary outcome was the six-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory at week 4 (intention to treat). Complementary multidimensional metrics of anxiety were obtained for robustness. Exploratory analyses tested outcome moderation by baseline sensory-affective dyspnea burden. Measurements and Main Results: Of 80 participants (24 clusters), 79 were analyzed (hypnosis 36, relaxation 43). Hypnosis did not differ from relaxation on the primary outcome (+0.95 points; 95% credible interval -5.85 to 7.42; posterior probability of clinically important hypnosis advantage 0.12) or its complementary metrics. Anxiety improved in both arms (pooled -5.72 points; -9.35 to -2.00). Exploratory analyses showed that the hypnosis advantage rose with baseline sensory and fell with affective burden, reaching -9.26 points at a high-sensory, low-affective profile (-23.37 to 4.71; posterior probability of clinically important hypnosis advantage 0.81). No deaths or serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Anxiety improved with no advantage of hypnosis over matched relaxation. Exploratory analysis suggests greater hypnosis benefit in patients with predominantly sensory dyspnea, proposing a candidate phenotype for stratified trials.
ER  -