Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Introducing a proline in the α1 M2-M3 linker relieves a molecular brake on channel activation in α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors

  1. 1Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America

Abstract

GABAA receptors (GABAARs) are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) essential for inhibitory synaptic transmission throughout the central nervous system. Despite progress in understanding their three-dimensional structure, the molecular basis for how neurotransmitter binding is transduced to ion channel gating remains poorly understood. Furthermore, relatively little is known about the contributions of distinct subunits to this coupling within typical heteromeric receptors. A highly conserved proline (site 1) in the M2-M3 linker of pLGIC subunits is involved in channel gating – e.g., P273 in the GABAAR β2 subunit. In GABAARs, only the β subunits have an additional proline in the M2-M3 linker (site 2) – e.g., β2(P276) – whereas all other subunits have a non-proline at the homologous site 2 position. Here, we investigate the functional contribution of proline at site 2 in distinct subunits of α1β2γ2 GABAARs. We expressed wild type or mutant α1β2γ2 GABAARs in Xenopus laevis oocytes and used two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology to record channel currents in response to GABA and/or other ligands. First, we introduced a proline at site 2 in α1 or γ2 subunits: α1(A280P) and γ2(S291P). Second, we replaced the site 2 proline in the β2 subunit with its homologous non-proline residue from α1 or γ2 subunits: β2(P276A) or β2(P276S). We show that α1(A280P) confers enhanced GABA-sensitivity and spontaneous unliganded channel activity, whereas γ2(S291P) has minor effects on channel activation. In contrast, β2(P276A) or β2(P276S) either had no effect or enhanced GABA-activation, respectively, indicating complex functional dependence on the side chain at site 2 in the β2 subunit. When in combination with other substitutions, the presence or absence of α1(A280P) was consistently correlated with enhanced GABA-sensitivity and spontaneous unliganded opening. Thus, introduction of a proline at site 2 in the α1 M2-M3 linker biases the channel towards an activated state and prevents it from remaining closed at rest.

Related

  1. Pyk2 scaffolding relieves Src autoinhibition to coordinate reciprocal kinase activation
    Alexzandrea Woudenberg, Kallie M. Zuidema, Tania M. Palhano Zanela +2
    Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewedLicence not statedMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  2. Isoform-selective modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors by quercetin and apigenin revealed through molecular simulations
    Erdal Balcan, Mehdi Irani
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  3. Genetically encoded intrabody sensors report the interaction and trafficking of β-arrestin 1 upon activation of G-protein–coupled receptors
    Mithu Baidya, Punita Kumari, Hemlata Dwivedi-Agnihotri +9
    Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY31 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationHAL
  4. 1017 Computational design of de novo antigen-specific T cell receptors using AI optimization and long-time-scale molecular simulations for targeted cancer immunotherapy
    Kellie N Smith, Yash Bhargava, Samuel J Huang +1
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYMolecular biology & gene regulationDOAJ
  5. Receptor-Specific Molecular Recognition of Maresin 1 and Docosahexaenoic Acid by the Nuclear Receptors PPARα, PPARγ, and RORα
    Matías Quiñones San Martín, Christian Olivera-Fuentes, Francisca Herrera-Vielma +5
    BiomoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
BibTeX
@article{desai2026introducing,
  title = {{Introducing a proline in the α1 M2-M3 linker relieves a molecular brake on channel activation in α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors}},
  author = {Netrang G. Desai and Pranavi Garlapati and Cecilia M. Borghese and Marcel P. Goldschen-Ohm},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0357367},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357367},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Introducing a proline in the α1 M2-M3 linker relieves a molecular brake on channel activation in α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors
AU  - Netrang G. Desai
AU  - Pranavi Garlapati
AU  - Cecilia M. Borghese
AU  - Marcel P. Goldschen-Ohm
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0357367
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357367
AB  - GABAA receptors (GABAARs) are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) essential for inhibitory synaptic transmission throughout the central nervous system. Despite progress in understanding their three-dimensional structure, the molecular basis for how neurotransmitter binding is transduced to ion channel gating remains poorly understood. Furthermore, relatively little is known about the contributions of distinct subunits to this coupling within typical heteromeric receptors. A highly conserved proline (site 1) in the M2-M3 linker of pLGIC subunits is involved in channel gating – e.g., P273 in the GABAAR β2 subunit. In GABAARs, only the β subunits have an additional proline in the M2-M3 linker (site 2) – e.g., β2(P276) – whereas all other subunits have a non-proline at the homologous site 2 position. Here, we investigate the functional contribution of proline at site 2 in distinct subunits of α1β2γ2 GABAARs. We expressed wild type or mutant α1β2γ2 GABAARs in Xenopus laevis oocytes and used two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology to record channel currents in response to GABA and/or other ligands. First, we introduced a proline at site 2 in α1 or γ2 subunits: α1(A280P) and γ2(S291P). Second, we replaced the site 2 proline in the β2 subunit with its homologous non-proline residue from α1 or γ2 subunits: β2(P276A) or β2(P276S). We show that α1(A280P) confers enhanced GABA-sensitivity and spontaneous unliganded channel activity, whereas γ2(S291P) has minor effects on channel activation. In contrast, β2(P276A) or β2(P276S) either had no effect or enhanced GABA-activation, respectively, indicating complex functional dependence on the side chain at site 2 in the β2 subunit. When in combination with other substitutions, the presence or absence of α1(A280P) was consistently correlated with enhanced GABA-sensitivity and spontaneous unliganded opening. Thus, introduction of a proline at site 2 in the α1 M2-M3 linker biases the channel towards an activated state and prevents it from remaining closed at rest.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -