Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation in Migraine: A Randomized, Participant- and Assessor-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial

  1. 1Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ordu University, 52200 Ordu, Türkiye
  2. 2Department of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Şiran Dursun Keleş School of Health Services, Gümüşhane University, 29100 Gümüşhane, Türkiye
  3. 3Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Services Vocational School, Bahcesehir University, 34353 Istanbul, Türkiye

Abstract

Background: Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Transcutaneous auricular trigeminal nerve stimulation (taTNS) has emerged as a non-invasive neuromodulation approach targeting trigeminal pathways involved in pain modulation. Objective: To investigate the effects of taTNS on migraine pain intensity, sleep quality, disability, and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in patients with migraine. Materials and Methods: This randomized, participant- and assessor-blind, sham-controlled trial included 102 participants who received taTNS (n = 51) or sham taTNS (n = 51). Active taTNS was administered bilaterally at 60 Hz, 250 μs, and up to 16 mA for 20 min, three times weekly for 12 weeks; sham stimulation used identical electrode placement at 0 mA. The primary outcome measures were migraine pain intensity (VAS), migraine-related disability (MIDAS) and sleep quality (PSQI); secondary outcomes included HRV, assessed using the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD). Results: At post-intervention, VAS and MIDAS scores were significantly lower in the taTNS group than in the sham-taTNS group (both p < 0.001), whereas PSQI scores did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.870). RMSSD was significantly higher in the taTNS group than in the sham-taTNS group (p = 0.013), whereas the between-group difference in SDNN was not statistically significant (p = 0.187). Conclusions: Compared with sham stimulation, taTNS was associated with greater reductions in migraine pain intensity and migraine-related disability, but no significant between-group difference was observed in sleep quality.

Related

  1. Efficacy and neural mechanisms of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for chronic insomnia: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Menghan Feng, Qin Liu, Xin Chen +3
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  2. Clinical Efficacy of Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric ADHD: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sandra Loo, Andrea Dillon, Giulia Salgari +6
    Research SquarePreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  3. Efficacy of diadynamic currents versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in subjects with overactive bladder syndrome: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Jaya Shanker Tedla, Sneha Latha Lalaji, Ajaya Kumar Midde +8
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeuroscienceClinical trials & evidence synthesisPLOS
  4. Transcutaneous low-level vagus nerve stimulation for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Lindi Bian, Yuwei Shi, Tieshuai Liu +3
    BMC complementary medicine and therapiesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurologyEurope PMCPMC
  5. Effects of synchronous versus sequential scalp acupuncture and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on post-stroke cognitive impairment based on multimodal assessments: a single-center randomized controlled trial protocol
    Jingyi Wei, Xihua Liu, Zhipeng Pan +4
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{yenisehir2026efficacy,
  title = {{Efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation in Migraine: A Randomized, Participant- and Assessor-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial}},
  author = {Semiha Yenişehir and Alper Perçin and Ali Veysel Özden},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218395},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8395},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation in Migraine: A Randomized, Participant- and Assessor-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial
AU  - Semiha Yenişehir
AU  - Alper Perçin
AU  - Ali Veysel Özden
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218395
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8395
AB  - Background: Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Transcutaneous auricular trigeminal nerve stimulation (taTNS) has emerged as a non-invasive neuromodulation approach targeting trigeminal pathways involved in pain modulation. Objective: To investigate the effects of taTNS on migraine pain intensity, sleep quality, disability, and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in patients with migraine. Materials and Methods: This randomized, participant- and assessor-blind, sham-controlled trial included 102 participants who received taTNS (n = 51) or sham taTNS (n = 51). Active taTNS was administered bilaterally at 60 Hz, 250 μs, and up to 16 mA for 20 min, three times weekly for 12 weeks; sham stimulation used identical electrode placement at 0 mA. The primary outcome measures were migraine pain intensity (VAS), migraine-related disability (MIDAS) and sleep quality (PSQI); secondary outcomes included HRV, assessed using the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD). Results: At post-intervention, VAS and MIDAS scores were significantly lower in the taTNS group than in the sham-taTNS group (both p < 0.001), whereas PSQI scores did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.870). RMSSD was significantly higher in the taTNS group than in the sham-taTNS group (p = 0.013), whereas the between-group difference in SDNN was not statistically significant (p = 0.187). Conclusions: Compared with sham stimulation, taTNS was associated with greater reductions in migraine pain intensity and migraine-related disability, but no significant between-group difference was observed in sleep quality.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -